Outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in minks: public health, environmental and bioethical perspectives

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dariusz Halabowski, Willis Gwenzi, Piotr Skubała, Andrzej Fal, Agnieszka Szuster-Ciesielska, Piotr Rzymski
{"title":"Outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in minks: public health, environmental and bioethical perspectives","authors":"Dariusz Halabowski,&nbsp;Willis Gwenzi,&nbsp;Piotr Skubała,&nbsp;Andrzej Fal,&nbsp;Agnieszka Szuster-Ciesielska,&nbsp;Piotr Rzymski","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01202-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in mink farms present critical public health, environmental, and bioethical challenges. These outbreaks underscore the potential for the virus to mutate within animal populations, raising concerns over the emergence of new variants capable of infecting a broader range of species and posing a threat of mink-to-human transmission. The conditions on mink farms, marked by high-density populations and poor welfare standards, exacerbate these risks and require a thorough reevaluation of current practices. This paper highlights the ongoing relevance of the fur industry amid an evolving viral threat. Despite initial stringent biosecurity measures, epidemiological surveillance of COVID-19 in humans and minks has diminished, increasing the risk for cryptic viral circulation and evolution in nonhuman hosts, including minks, with unpredictable outcomes for public health. Mink farming poses a potential continuous zoonotic threat and has significant environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss. The present work delves into the bioethical implications of mink farming during the pandemic, emphasizing the moral considerations of animal welfare in the context of industrial farming. The documented high mortality rates and poor living conditions of minks necessitate a reassessment of the ethical foundations of the fur industry. The paper advocates for enhanced biosecurity protocols, routine health surveillance, and adopting an integrated One Health perspective, which highlights the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01202-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01202-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in mink farms present critical public health, environmental, and bioethical challenges. These outbreaks underscore the potential for the virus to mutate within animal populations, raising concerns over the emergence of new variants capable of infecting a broader range of species and posing a threat of mink-to-human transmission. The conditions on mink farms, marked by high-density populations and poor welfare standards, exacerbate these risks and require a thorough reevaluation of current practices. This paper highlights the ongoing relevance of the fur industry amid an evolving viral threat. Despite initial stringent biosecurity measures, epidemiological surveillance of COVID-19 in humans and minks has diminished, increasing the risk for cryptic viral circulation and evolution in nonhuman hosts, including minks, with unpredictable outcomes for public health. Mink farming poses a potential continuous zoonotic threat and has significant environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss. The present work delves into the bioethical implications of mink farming during the pandemic, emphasizing the moral considerations of animal welfare in the context of industrial farming. The documented high mortality rates and poor living conditions of minks necessitate a reassessment of the ethical foundations of the fur industry. The paper advocates for enhanced biosecurity protocols, routine health surveillance, and adopting an integrated One Health perspective, which highlights the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental health.

SARS-CoV-2在水貂中的暴发:公共卫生、环境和生物伦理观点
在水貂养殖场暴发的SARS-CoV-2带来了重大的公共卫生、环境和生物伦理挑战。这些疫情突出表明该病毒有可能在动物种群中发生变异,引起人们对出现能够感染更广泛物种的新变种的担忧,并构成水貂向人类传播的威胁。水貂养殖场的人口密度高,福利标准差,这加剧了这些风险,需要对目前的做法进行彻底的重新评估。本文强调了在不断发展的病毒威胁中毛皮行业的持续相关性。尽管最初采取了严格的生物安全措施,但COVID-19在人类和水貂中的流行病学监测已经减弱,这增加了隐病毒在包括水貂在内的非人类宿主中传播和进化的风险,对公共卫生造成不可预测的后果。水貂养殖构成潜在的持续人畜共患病威胁,并对环境产生重大影响,包括温室气体排放和生物多样性丧失。目前的工作深入研究了大流行期间水貂养殖的生物伦理影响,强调了工业化养殖背景下动物福利的道德考虑。记录在案的水貂的高死亡率和恶劣的生活条件需要对毛皮工业的道德基础进行重新评估。本文提倡加强生物安全协议、常规健康监测和采用一体化的“同一个健康”观点,强调人类、动物和环境健康的相互依存关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信