Evaluating the measurement uncertainty in determination of sulfamethoxazole in compound sulfamethoxazole tablets by dual-wavelength spectrophotometry

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Dalin Chann, Sophany Ret
{"title":"Evaluating the measurement uncertainty in determination of sulfamethoxazole in compound sulfamethoxazole tablets by dual-wavelength spectrophotometry","authors":"Dalin Chann,&nbsp;Sophany Ret","doi":"10.1007/s00769-025-01653-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the determination of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) in compound sulfamethoxazole tablets using dual-wavelength spectrophotometry is presented. The average SMZ content determined was 0.3570 g/tablet, with an average tablet mass of 0.5671 g. The method leverages the ability to minimize interference from overlapping spectral bands by measuring absorbance differences at two distinct wavelengths (257 nm and 306 nm). Sources of uncertainty, including the average mass of tablets, sample mass, and absorbance values, were systematically analyzed. Findings reveal a combined standard uncertainty for a single determination of 0.0154 g/tablet. Absorbance measurement uncertainty, particularly for the standard at 306 nm (A<sub>C306</sub>) and the sample at 306 nm (A<sub>s306</sub>), were identified as significant contributors to the overall uncertainties. Triplicate analysis provided a limited reduction in the impact of repeatability uncertainty, with the overall combined standard uncertainty improving minimally to 0.0154 g/tablet. These results suggest that method optimization, such as adjusting concentrations to ensure absorbance readings are in a more optimal range, or consideration of alternative techniques may be needed to enhance the precision of SMZ quantification, contributing to robust quality control in pharmaceutical analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 4","pages":"399 - 406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-025-01653-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the determination of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) in compound sulfamethoxazole tablets using dual-wavelength spectrophotometry is presented. The average SMZ content determined was 0.3570 g/tablet, with an average tablet mass of 0.5671 g. The method leverages the ability to minimize interference from overlapping spectral bands by measuring absorbance differences at two distinct wavelengths (257 nm and 306 nm). Sources of uncertainty, including the average mass of tablets, sample mass, and absorbance values, were systematically analyzed. Findings reveal a combined standard uncertainty for a single determination of 0.0154 g/tablet. Absorbance measurement uncertainty, particularly for the standard at 306 nm (AC306) and the sample at 306 nm (As306), were identified as significant contributors to the overall uncertainties. Triplicate analysis provided a limited reduction in the impact of repeatability uncertainty, with the overall combined standard uncertainty improving minimally to 0.0154 g/tablet. These results suggest that method optimization, such as adjusting concentrations to ensure absorbance readings are in a more optimal range, or consideration of alternative techniques may be needed to enhance the precision of SMZ quantification, contributing to robust quality control in pharmaceutical analysis.

Abstract Image

双波长分光光度法测定复方磺胺甲恶唑片中磺胺甲恶唑含量的不确定度评定
建立了双波长分光光度法测定复方磺胺甲恶唑片中磺胺甲恶唑(SMZ)含量的不确定度评定方法。测定的平均SMZ含量为0.3570 g/片,平均片剂质量为0.5671 g。该方法通过测量两个不同波长(257 nm和306 nm)的吸光度差异,最大限度地减少重叠光谱带的干扰。系统地分析了不确定度的来源,包括片剂的平均质量、样品质量和吸光度值。结果表明,单次测定0.0154 g/片的综合标准不确定度。吸光度测量不确定度,特别是306 nm的标准品(AC306)和306 nm的样品(As306),被认为是总体不确定度的重要贡献者。三次重复分析有限地降低了重复性不确定度的影响,总体联合标准不确定度最低限度地提高到0.0154 g/片。这些结果表明,可能需要优化方法,例如调整浓度以确保吸光度读数在更理想的范围内,或考虑替代技术来提高SMZ定量的精度,从而有助于药物分析中强有力的质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信