A Symmetric and Comparative Study of Decision Making in Intuitionistic Multi-objective Optimization Environment: Past, Present and Future

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Pinki, Rakesh Kumar, Wattana Viriyasitavat, Assadaporn Sapsomboon, Gaurav Dhiman, Reem Alshahrani, Suhare Solaiman, Rashmi Choudhary, Protyay Dey, R. Sivaranjani
{"title":"A Symmetric and Comparative Study of Decision Making in Intuitionistic Multi-objective Optimization Environment: Past, Present and Future","authors":"Pinki,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar,&nbsp;Wattana Viriyasitavat,&nbsp;Assadaporn Sapsomboon,&nbsp;Gaurav Dhiman,&nbsp;Reem Alshahrani,&nbsp;Suhare Solaiman,&nbsp;Rashmi Choudhary,&nbsp;Protyay Dey,&nbsp;R. Sivaranjani","doi":"10.1007/s11831-025-10243-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, we look at how intuitionistic fuzzy programming (IFP) for MOO works in several real-life situations. Problems in the real world frequently have non-linear properties, in contrast to the majority of MOO research, which has traditionally relied on linear assignment functions in an intuitionistic setting. To tackle this, our research takes into account non-linear functions such as hyperbolic, parabolic, exponential, and s-curved functions. These functions handle the constraints caused by convexity and concavity in certain areas of the domain, as well as the impact of the functions' slopes. We then investigate 25 potential hybrid scenarios involving various membership and non-membership functions in IFP methods. Evaluating how these hybrid scenarios affect IFP's ability to handle the complexity of MOO is our main goal. By evaluating how various scenarios perform, we attempt to determine the best setups and comprehend their advantages and disadvantages. The results of our quantitative evaluations and practical implementations shed light on multi-objective optimization in real-world settings, which is useful for practitioners and decision makers. To further illustrate the real-world consequences of different IFP approaches, we offer an engaging case study in the agricultural sector. This study not only consolidates current knowledge but also provides practical assistance for achieving optimal results in diverse situations, enhancing our grasp of optimization strategies based on IFP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 6","pages":"3375 - 3413"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-025-10243-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we look at how intuitionistic fuzzy programming (IFP) for MOO works in several real-life situations. Problems in the real world frequently have non-linear properties, in contrast to the majority of MOO research, which has traditionally relied on linear assignment functions in an intuitionistic setting. To tackle this, our research takes into account non-linear functions such as hyperbolic, parabolic, exponential, and s-curved functions. These functions handle the constraints caused by convexity and concavity in certain areas of the domain, as well as the impact of the functions' slopes. We then investigate 25 potential hybrid scenarios involving various membership and non-membership functions in IFP methods. Evaluating how these hybrid scenarios affect IFP's ability to handle the complexity of MOO is our main goal. By evaluating how various scenarios perform, we attempt to determine the best setups and comprehend their advantages and disadvantages. The results of our quantitative evaluations and practical implementations shed light on multi-objective optimization in real-world settings, which is useful for practitioners and decision makers. To further illustrate the real-world consequences of different IFP approaches, we offer an engaging case study in the agricultural sector. This study not only consolidates current knowledge but also provides practical assistance for achieving optimal results in diverse situations, enhancing our grasp of optimization strategies based on IFP.

直觉型多目标优化环境下决策的对称比较研究:过去、现在和未来
在本文中,我们将研究面向MOO的直觉模糊规划(IFP)如何在几种实际情况下工作。与大多数MOO研究不同,现实世界中的问题通常具有非线性特性,而MOO研究传统上依赖于直觉设置中的线性分配函数。为了解决这个问题,我们的研究考虑了非线性函数,如双曲函数、抛物线函数、指数函数和s曲线函数。这些函数处理由域的某些区域的凹凸性引起的约束,以及函数斜率的影响。然后,我们研究了IFP方法中涉及各种隶属和非隶属函数的25种潜在混合场景。评估这些混合场景如何影响IFP处理MOO复杂性的能力是我们的主要目标。通过评估各种场景的执行情况,我们试图确定最佳设置并了解其优点和缺点。我们的定量评估和实际实施的结果揭示了现实环境中的多目标优化,这对从业者和决策者很有用。为了进一步说明不同IFP方法的现实后果,我们在农业部门提供了一个引人入胜的案例研究。本研究不仅巩固了现有的知识,而且为在不同情况下获得最优结果提供了实际的帮助,增强了我们对基于IFP的优化策略的掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信