The Critical Cutting Speed for Cane Stubble Stems and Optimization of Deep Vertical Rotary Tillage Blade

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Wang Yang, Junxiong Huang, Zhengkai Luo, Rongfang Zhu, Zhiheng Lu
{"title":"The Critical Cutting Speed for Cane Stubble Stems and Optimization of Deep Vertical Rotary Tillage Blade","authors":"Wang Yang,&nbsp;Junxiong Huang,&nbsp;Zhengkai Luo,&nbsp;Rongfang Zhu,&nbsp;Zhiheng Lu","doi":"10.1007/s12355-025-01574-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When performing deep vertical rotary tillage (DVRT) in sugarcane stubble fields, the weakly supported soil condition (broken-soil state) results in insufficient fragmentation of cane stubble stems during cutting.</p><p>This study developed a coupled FEM-DEM simulation model of the stem-soil-blade system under weak soil support conditions. The model was used to evaluate three common DVRT blades: the large bending angle blade (LBAB), the horizontal rotary tillage universal blade (HRTUB), and the stubble shredding blade (SSB), along with their rectangular and serrated extensions. The analysis focused on the influence of blade geometry and structural parameters on critical cutting speed (CCS) and maximum cutting force (MCF). Geometric parameters of the HRTUB-Circular Sawtooth (CS) configuration, which demonstrated optimal cutting performance, were then optimized. Experimental results showed that with blade edge thicknesses of 1–3 mm, the average CCS values for LBAB, HRTUB, and SSB reached 12.8 m/s, 12.7 m/s, and 12.8 m/s, respectively, while the average MCF measurements were 322.2 N, 323.4 N, and 327.1 N. When implementing HRTUB-CS blades with a 1.5 mm edge thickness under optimized tooth parameters (8 mm pitch and 0.6 height-to-pitch ratio), CCS decreased to 7.9 m/s and MCF decreased to 226.1 N. These values represented reductions of 31.3%, 30.7%, and 33.1% for CCS, and 23.1%, 23.5%, and 24% for MCF compared to LBAB, HRTUB, and SSB, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing DVRT cutters and offer methodological references for other mechanical stubble return operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"27 4","pages":"1228 - 1242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-025-01574-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When performing deep vertical rotary tillage (DVRT) in sugarcane stubble fields, the weakly supported soil condition (broken-soil state) results in insufficient fragmentation of cane stubble stems during cutting.

This study developed a coupled FEM-DEM simulation model of the stem-soil-blade system under weak soil support conditions. The model was used to evaluate three common DVRT blades: the large bending angle blade (LBAB), the horizontal rotary tillage universal blade (HRTUB), and the stubble shredding blade (SSB), along with their rectangular and serrated extensions. The analysis focused on the influence of blade geometry and structural parameters on critical cutting speed (CCS) and maximum cutting force (MCF). Geometric parameters of the HRTUB-Circular Sawtooth (CS) configuration, which demonstrated optimal cutting performance, were then optimized. Experimental results showed that with blade edge thicknesses of 1–3 mm, the average CCS values for LBAB, HRTUB, and SSB reached 12.8 m/s, 12.7 m/s, and 12.8 m/s, respectively, while the average MCF measurements were 322.2 N, 323.4 N, and 327.1 N. When implementing HRTUB-CS blades with a 1.5 mm edge thickness under optimized tooth parameters (8 mm pitch and 0.6 height-to-pitch ratio), CCS decreased to 7.9 m/s and MCF decreased to 226.1 N. These values represented reductions of 31.3%, 30.7%, and 33.1% for CCS, and 23.1%, 23.5%, and 24% for MCF compared to LBAB, HRTUB, and SSB, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing DVRT cutters and offer methodological references for other mechanical stubble return operations.

Abstract Image

甘蔗残茬茎的临界切削速度及深竖旋耕叶片的优化
在甘蔗残茬田进行深垂直旋耕(DVRT)时,弱支撑土壤条件(破碎土状态)导致甘蔗残茬茎在刈割时破碎程度不够。建立了弱土壤支护条件下茎-土壤-叶片系统的FEM-DEM耦合模拟模型。利用该模型对三种常见的DVRT叶片:大弯角叶片(LBAB)、水平旋耕通用叶片(HRTUB)和碎茬叶片(SSB)及其矩形和锯齿形扩展进行了评价。重点分析了叶片几何和结构参数对临界切削速度和最大切削力的影响。然后对具有最佳切削性能的HRTUB-Circular Sawtooth (CS)配置的几何参数进行了优化。实验结果表明,叶片边缘厚度的1 - 3毫米,平均为LBAB CCS值,HRTUB,单边带达到12.8 m / s, 12.7 m / s, 12.8 m / s,分别而MCF测量平均322.2 N, 323.4 N,和327.1 N在实现HRTUB-CS叶片边缘厚度1.5毫米在优化齿参数(8毫米音高和0.6 height-to-pitch比率),CCS下降到7.9 m / s和MCF下降到226.1 N这些值代表减少31.3%,30.7%,与LBAB、HRTUB和SSB相比,CCS和MCF分别为23.1%、23.5%和24%。这些发现为优化DVRT切割器提供了有价值的见解,并为其他机械残茬返回操作提供了方法参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信