Differential distribution of fine roots between Robusta coffee and shade trees influences water use

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Judith Kobusinge, Godfrey H. Kagezi, Godfrey Sseremba, Godfrey Taulya, Alice Nakitende, Geofrey Arinaitwe
{"title":"Differential distribution of fine roots between Robusta coffee and shade trees influences water use","authors":"Judith Kobusinge,&nbsp;Godfrey H. Kagezi,&nbsp;Godfrey Sseremba,&nbsp;Godfrey Taulya,&nbsp;Alice Nakitende,&nbsp;Geofrey Arinaitwe","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01319-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coffee is Uganda’s most important cash crop, commonly grown in agroforestry systems that offer shade, food, timber, and microclimate regulation. However, shade trees may compete with coffee for water and nutrients. This study characterized root distribution and water use of Robusta coffee and shade trees. A randomized complete block design was used with three treatments: coffee under <i>Albizia coriaria</i> (ACS), coffee under <i>Ficus natalensis</i> (FNCS), and open sun coffee (COSS), each replicated three times. Soil moisture was monitored using a Diviner 2000, and fine root distribution assessed through soil sampling up to 100 cm depth at varying distances from coffee plants (≤ 50, 51–199, and ≥ 200 cm). ImageJ software was used to measure root length from which root length density (RLD) and specific root length (SRL) were computed per depth layer. Significant differences in RLD were observed (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), highest in COSS (0.11 cm/cm<sup>3</sup>) and lowest in FNCS (0.06 cm/cm<sup>3</sup>). Most fine roots were concentrated in the top 20 cm. Horizontally, FNCS showed differentiation, with coffee roots mainly at 51–199 cm, and <i>F. natalensis</i> roots at ≤ 50 cm. FNCS had the highest SRL (1063.9 cm/g), and ACS the lowest (597.8 cm/g), though differences were not statistically significant. Vertically, <i>F. natalensis</i> roots dominated the 80–100 cm layer, while coffee roots were concentrated at 20–40 cm. Actual evapotranspiration (ETa) varied with season and shade tree species but differences among systems were not significant. The findings indicate competition for water between coffee and shade trees, emphasizing the importance of shade tree management to reduce below-ground competition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01319-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coffee is Uganda’s most important cash crop, commonly grown in agroforestry systems that offer shade, food, timber, and microclimate regulation. However, shade trees may compete with coffee for water and nutrients. This study characterized root distribution and water use of Robusta coffee and shade trees. A randomized complete block design was used with three treatments: coffee under Albizia coriaria (ACS), coffee under Ficus natalensis (FNCS), and open sun coffee (COSS), each replicated three times. Soil moisture was monitored using a Diviner 2000, and fine root distribution assessed through soil sampling up to 100 cm depth at varying distances from coffee plants (≤ 50, 51–199, and ≥ 200 cm). ImageJ software was used to measure root length from which root length density (RLD) and specific root length (SRL) were computed per depth layer. Significant differences in RLD were observed (p < 0.05), highest in COSS (0.11 cm/cm3) and lowest in FNCS (0.06 cm/cm3). Most fine roots were concentrated in the top 20 cm. Horizontally, FNCS showed differentiation, with coffee roots mainly at 51–199 cm, and F. natalensis roots at ≤ 50 cm. FNCS had the highest SRL (1063.9 cm/g), and ACS the lowest (597.8 cm/g), though differences were not statistically significant. Vertically, F. natalensis roots dominated the 80–100 cm layer, while coffee roots were concentrated at 20–40 cm. Actual evapotranspiration (ETa) varied with season and shade tree species but differences among systems were not significant. The findings indicate competition for water between coffee and shade trees, emphasizing the importance of shade tree management to reduce below-ground competition.

罗布斯塔咖啡和遮荫树细根的不同分布影响了水的利用
咖啡是乌干达最重要的经济作物,通常种植在农林业系统中,提供荫凉、食物、木材和小气候调节。然而,遮荫树可能会与咖啡争夺水分和营养。本研究对罗布斯塔咖啡和遮荫树的根系分布和水分利用进行了研究。采用随机完全区组设计,采用三种处理,分别为黑荆咖啡(ACS)、红ficus natalensis咖啡(FNCS)和开放式太阳咖啡(COSS),每组重复3次。使用Diviner 2000监测土壤湿度,并通过在距离咖啡树不同距离(≤50、51-199和≥200 cm)的100 cm深度的土壤取样来评估细根分布。利用ImageJ软件测量根长度,计算根长度密度(RLD)和比根长度(SRL)。RLD差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05), COSS最高(0.11 cm/cm3), FNCS最低(0.06 cm/cm3)。细根主要集中在植株顶部20 cm处。水平方向上,咖啡根以51 ~ 199 cm为主,纳塔勒姆根以≤50 cm为主。FNCS的SRL最高(1063.9 cm/g), ACS最低(597.8 cm/g),但差异无统计学意义。垂直方向上,红枫根在80 ~ 100 cm层占主导地位,咖啡根集中在20 ~ 40 cm层。实际蒸散量随季节和遮荫树种的变化而变化,但系统间差异不显著。研究结果表明了咖啡树和遮荫树之间对水的竞争,强调了遮荫树管理对减少地下竞争的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信