Qusay Shihab Hamad, Sami Abdulla Mohsen Saleh, Shahrel Azmin Suandi, Hussein Samma, Yasameen Shihab Hamad, Abdelazim G. Hussien
{"title":"A Review of Enhancing Sine Cosine Algorithm: Common Approaches for Improved Metaheuristic Algorithms","authors":"Qusay Shihab Hamad, Sami Abdulla Mohsen Saleh, Shahrel Azmin Suandi, Hussein Samma, Yasameen Shihab Hamad, Abdelazim G. Hussien","doi":"10.1007/s11831-024-10218-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the quest for optimizing metaheuristic algorithms has led to a surge in research efforts aimed at enhancing their performance. While existing reviews have diligently summarized these endeavors, they primarily focus on presenting the collective body of work undertaken to augment standard algorithms. In contrast, this paper takes a unique perspective by concentrating on the myriad methodologies employed by authors to improve one such algorithm, the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Our comprehensive review dissects the various strategies used to elevate the effectiveness of SCA variants, meticulously scrutinizing their advantages and disadvantages. This in-depth analysis extends beyond the confines of SCA and provides valuable insights into the broader landscape of metaheuristic optimization algorithms. By evaluating the pros and cons of these enhancement methods, our work forms a foundational review that can be applied to other optimization algorithms. Through this broader lens, we offer readers a comprehensive overview of the strategies adopted by researchers in recent years to enhance optimization algorithms, facilitating a deeper understanding of the advancement of this vital field. Our paper thus serves as a guidepost for researchers and practitioners navigating the ever-evolving terrain of metaheuristic optimization, shedding light on the strengths and potential pitfalls of enhancement methodologies. It provides a holistic perspective that empowers the community to make informed choices when selecting or devising strategies to optimize algorithms for diverse problem domains. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 4","pages":"2549 - 2606"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10218-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, the quest for optimizing metaheuristic algorithms has led to a surge in research efforts aimed at enhancing their performance. While existing reviews have diligently summarized these endeavors, they primarily focus on presenting the collective body of work undertaken to augment standard algorithms. In contrast, this paper takes a unique perspective by concentrating on the myriad methodologies employed by authors to improve one such algorithm, the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA). Our comprehensive review dissects the various strategies used to elevate the effectiveness of SCA variants, meticulously scrutinizing their advantages and disadvantages. This in-depth analysis extends beyond the confines of SCA and provides valuable insights into the broader landscape of metaheuristic optimization algorithms. By evaluating the pros and cons of these enhancement methods, our work forms a foundational review that can be applied to other optimization algorithms. Through this broader lens, we offer readers a comprehensive overview of the strategies adopted by researchers in recent years to enhance optimization algorithms, facilitating a deeper understanding of the advancement of this vital field. Our paper thus serves as a guidepost for researchers and practitioners navigating the ever-evolving terrain of metaheuristic optimization, shedding light on the strengths and potential pitfalls of enhancement methodologies. It provides a holistic perspective that empowers the community to make informed choices when selecting or devising strategies to optimize algorithms for diverse problem domains.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
Aim and Scope:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication.
Review Format:
Reviews published in the journal offer:
A survey of current literature
Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity
By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.