The 20th Anniversary of the Installation of the Small-Aperture Mikhnevo Array for Monitoring Induced Seismicity

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
I. O. Kitov, I. A. Sanina, S. G. Volosov, N. L. Konstantinovskaya
{"title":"The 20th Anniversary of the Installation of the Small-Aperture Mikhnevo Array for Monitoring Induced Seismicity","authors":"I. O. Kitov,&nbsp;I. A. Sanina,&nbsp;S. G. Volosov,&nbsp;N. L. Konstantinovskaya","doi":"10.1134/S1069351325700181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b>—Over the 20 years of continuous operation of the Mikhnevo small-aperture seismic array (SASA), vast experience in recording ultraweak signals generated by regional and global seismicity has been accumulated. High-resolution data processing methods have been developed and applied, including beam-forming and waveform cross correlation. In this review of the results of instrumental observations and processing, two approaches to reducing the detection threshold for seismic events when monitoring induced seismicity are considered: the use of array stations and the waveform cross-correlation method (WCCM). The efficiency of the approaches with respect to the detection, location, and identification of weak seismic sources is illustrated by the aftershock sequence of the earthquake near Mariupol that occurred on August 7, 2016, as well as the aftershocks of the fifth and sixth announced explosions in the DPRK, detected during the period from September 9, 2016, to September 11, 2021. The coordinates of the earthquake were estimated using the data of the Mikhnevo array and the temporary Rostov-on-Don SASA of IDG RAS. The location accuracy is comparable to the accuracy provided by 49 three-component (3-C) stations of FRC GS RAS. In the five days after the earthquake, 12 aftershocks were detected and located with respect to the mainshock using the WCC method. The group stations of the International Monitoring System (IMC) AKASG and BRTR and the 3-C station KBZ also participated in the detection and estimation of the parameters. The network of stations of the FRC GS RAS detected five aftershocks, and the IMC did not detect a single one. The location of explosions in the DPRK using the WCCM made it possible to determine their relative location with an accuracy of 100–200 m. The sixth explosion could not be accurately located with respect to the others due to the finite size of its source, which introduced significant changes in the differential travel time, depending on the direction to the station. The WCCM was also used to detect and identify weak seismic events within the DPRK Punggye-ri test site using template waveforms from explosions and aftershocks of the fifth and sixth tests, recorded at the IMC array stations KSRS and USRK. Over a 5-year observation period, 89 events were detected. Based on estimates of the cross-correlation characteristics of signals at both stations, it was possible to divide the general aftershock sequence into two separate ones associated with processes in the zones of influence of the fifth and sixth explosions.</p>","PeriodicalId":602,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","volume":"61 2","pages":"288 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1069351325700181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract—Over the 20 years of continuous operation of the Mikhnevo small-aperture seismic array (SASA), vast experience in recording ultraweak signals generated by regional and global seismicity has been accumulated. High-resolution data processing methods have been developed and applied, including beam-forming and waveform cross correlation. In this review of the results of instrumental observations and processing, two approaches to reducing the detection threshold for seismic events when monitoring induced seismicity are considered: the use of array stations and the waveform cross-correlation method (WCCM). The efficiency of the approaches with respect to the detection, location, and identification of weak seismic sources is illustrated by the aftershock sequence of the earthquake near Mariupol that occurred on August 7, 2016, as well as the aftershocks of the fifth and sixth announced explosions in the DPRK, detected during the period from September 9, 2016, to September 11, 2021. The coordinates of the earthquake were estimated using the data of the Mikhnevo array and the temporary Rostov-on-Don SASA of IDG RAS. The location accuracy is comparable to the accuracy provided by 49 three-component (3-C) stations of FRC GS RAS. In the five days after the earthquake, 12 aftershocks were detected and located with respect to the mainshock using the WCC method. The group stations of the International Monitoring System (IMC) AKASG and BRTR and the 3-C station KBZ also participated in the detection and estimation of the parameters. The network of stations of the FRC GS RAS detected five aftershocks, and the IMC did not detect a single one. The location of explosions in the DPRK using the WCCM made it possible to determine their relative location with an accuracy of 100–200 m. The sixth explosion could not be accurately located with respect to the others due to the finite size of its source, which introduced significant changes in the differential travel time, depending on the direction to the station. The WCCM was also used to detect and identify weak seismic events within the DPRK Punggye-ri test site using template waveforms from explosions and aftershocks of the fifth and sixth tests, recorded at the IMC array stations KSRS and USRK. Over a 5-year observation period, 89 events were detected. Based on estimates of the cross-correlation characteristics of signals at both stations, it was possible to divide the general aftershock sequence into two separate ones associated with processes in the zones of influence of the fifth and sixth explosions.

Abstract Image

用于监测诱发地震活动的小孔径米赫涅沃阵列安装20周年
摘要:Mikhnevo小孔径地震台阵(SASA)在连续运行20多年中,积累了大量记录区域和全球地震活动产生的超弱信号的经验。高分辨率数据处理方法得到了发展和应用,包括波束形成和波形互相关。在对仪器观测和处理结果的回顾中,考虑了在监测诱发地震活动性时降低地震事件检测阈值的两种方法:使用阵列台站和波形互相关法(WCCM)。2016年8月7日马里乌波尔附近地震的余震序列,以及2016年9月9日至2021年9月11日期间朝鲜宣布的第五次和第六次爆炸的余震,说明了这些方法在弱震源探测、定位和识别方面的效率。利用米赫涅沃阵列和IDG RAS的临时顿河畔罗斯托夫SASA的数据估计了地震的坐标。定位精度可与FRC GS RAS的49个三分量(3-C)站的定位精度相媲美。在地震发生后的5天内,使用WCC方法检测并定位了12次与主震相关的余震。国际监测系统(IMC)的群站AKASG和BRTR以及3-C站KBZ也参与了参数的探测和估计。FRC GS RAS台站网络检测到5次余震,而IMC没有检测到一次余震。利用WCCM确定朝鲜境内爆炸的位置,可以确定其相对位置的精度为100-200米。由于震源的大小有限,第六次爆炸相对于其他几次爆炸无法精确定位,这使得根据前往空间站的方向,差分传播时间发生了重大变化。WCCM还被用来探测和识别朝鲜丰溪里试验场内的弱地震事件,使用的是由IMC阵列站KSRS和USRK记录的第五次和第六次试验的爆炸和余震的模板波形。在5年的观察期间,共检测到89起事件。根据对两个台站信号相互关联特征的估计,有可能将一般余震序列划分为与第五次和第六次爆炸影响区内的过程相关的两个独立序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
30.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes results of original theoretical and experimental research in relevant areas of the physics of the Earth''s interior and applied geophysics. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信