Silvia Mohr, Mishal Antony, Valeska Contardo-Jara, Ulrike Scholz, Stefan Bader, Christian Polleichtner, Gertie Arts
{"title":"Evaluating herbicidal risks of the fungicide tebuconazole: differential sensitivity of dicot and monocot macrophytes in freshwater mesocosms","authors":"Silvia Mohr, Mishal Antony, Valeska Contardo-Jara, Ulrike Scholz, Stefan Bader, Christian Polleichtner, Gertie Arts","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01174-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The triazole fungicide tebuconazole (TBZ) has plant growth regulatory properties and is used as such in, e.g., oilseed rape crop production. To date, very little is known about the phytohormonal effects of TBZ on macrophytes. There are only data for the monocot macrophyte <i>Lemna</i> sp. available in the literature, which indicate a moderate risk for macrophytes. However, dicot macrophyte species are known to generally be more sensitive to growth regulating pesticides, due to the phytohormonal effects of these substances. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate if TBZ may impact monocot and dicot aquatic macrophytes differently and to quantify these effects. Two in situ experiments were conducted as part of a comprehensive study in freshwater mesocosms to evaluate direct and indirect effects of TBZ on five macrophyte species, particularly comparing the dicot species <i>Myriophyllum spicatum</i> with monocot duckweed species and the macrophyte standing stock of the mesocosms. For this, six naturally established freshwater mesocosms were dosed once with six different concentrations of TBZ (5–5000 μg/L), two served as controls.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The dicot <i>M. spicatum</i> was the most sensitive species with the lowest EC<sub>50</sub> (14 d) of 228 µg/L TBZ. In contrast, the monocot broad-leaved pondweed <i>Potamogeton natans</i> and two duckweed species reacted far less sensitive in this study with <i>Spirodela polyrhiza</i> being the most sensitive monocot species (EC<sub>50</sub> (14 d): 1487 µg/L TBZ). Shoots of <i>M. spicatum</i>, which were grown directly as standing stock in the mesocosms, developed strong growth deformities in the form of shorter stems and condensed leaf whorls during the course of the study in the higher TBZ treatments. This effect can be linked to the anti-gibberellic mode of action of TBZ.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study highlight that short-term in situ experiments are a valuable tool that can efficiently be integrated into comprehensive mesocosm studies investigating aquatic communities, in order to gain reliable EC<sub>x</sub> data for several non-standard macrophyte species with different growth forms under near-natural conditions. The results of this research underscore that for regulatory risk assessment of fungicides with a phytohormonal mode of action, dicot aquatic macrophytes need to be included in the first tier of the risk assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01174-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01174-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The triazole fungicide tebuconazole (TBZ) has plant growth regulatory properties and is used as such in, e.g., oilseed rape crop production. To date, very little is known about the phytohormonal effects of TBZ on macrophytes. There are only data for the monocot macrophyte Lemna sp. available in the literature, which indicate a moderate risk for macrophytes. However, dicot macrophyte species are known to generally be more sensitive to growth regulating pesticides, due to the phytohormonal effects of these substances. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate if TBZ may impact monocot and dicot aquatic macrophytes differently and to quantify these effects. Two in situ experiments were conducted as part of a comprehensive study in freshwater mesocosms to evaluate direct and indirect effects of TBZ on five macrophyte species, particularly comparing the dicot species Myriophyllum spicatum with monocot duckweed species and the macrophyte standing stock of the mesocosms. For this, six naturally established freshwater mesocosms were dosed once with six different concentrations of TBZ (5–5000 μg/L), two served as controls.
Results
The dicot M. spicatum was the most sensitive species with the lowest EC50 (14 d) of 228 µg/L TBZ. In contrast, the monocot broad-leaved pondweed Potamogeton natans and two duckweed species reacted far less sensitive in this study with Spirodela polyrhiza being the most sensitive monocot species (EC50 (14 d): 1487 µg/L TBZ). Shoots of M. spicatum, which were grown directly as standing stock in the mesocosms, developed strong growth deformities in the form of shorter stems and condensed leaf whorls during the course of the study in the higher TBZ treatments. This effect can be linked to the anti-gibberellic mode of action of TBZ.
Conclusion
The results of this study highlight that short-term in situ experiments are a valuable tool that can efficiently be integrated into comprehensive mesocosm studies investigating aquatic communities, in order to gain reliable ECx data for several non-standard macrophyte species with different growth forms under near-natural conditions. The results of this research underscore that for regulatory risk assessment of fungicides with a phytohormonal mode of action, dicot aquatic macrophytes need to be included in the first tier of the risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation.
ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation.
ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation.
Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues.
Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.