Implementing ethical principles in AI: an initial discussion

Mykhailo Danilevskyi, Fernando Perez-Tellez, Davide Buscaldi
{"title":"Implementing ethical principles in AI: an initial discussion","authors":"Mykhailo Danilevskyi,&nbsp;Fernando Perez-Tellez,&nbsp;Davide Buscaldi","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00710-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, there has been a lot of discussion around ethics in IT and AI. Many researchers and organisations have proposed guidelines to address privacy, fairness, and explainability challenges for creating trustworthy AI. In this paper, we discuss ethical principles in the context of AI and their significance in developing trustworthy AI solutions. We consider the problem of the categorisation of ethical principles in IT. We concentrate our discussion on privacy, fairness, and explainability. These principles, we believe, meaningfully contribute to the trust of AI systems. We overview the available privacy regulations in the EU and US. We also look at how to achieve compliance with them, including private data detection, data anonymisation techniques and toolkits. From a practical perspective, we analyse fairness and bias problems. We discuss the issue of fairness assessment and metrics. To improve the fairness of AI solutions, an enormous number of techniques have been developed. We also focus on fairness improvement techniques and a few popular toolkits in which these techniques are implemented. Explainability is another ethical principle discussed. It is one of many socially important properties, as it ensures understanding of AI system decision-making and transparency in inspection. Ensuring explainability is important for high-risk applications in healthcare, finance and criminal justice. Finally, we outline approaches that help in the level of explainability. With this review and analysis, we contribute to the knowledge of available techniques and toolkits that can be used by AI practitioners as an initial step in implementing ethical principles into AI solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 4","pages":"3549 - 3555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00710-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00710-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a lot of discussion around ethics in IT and AI. Many researchers and organisations have proposed guidelines to address privacy, fairness, and explainability challenges for creating trustworthy AI. In this paper, we discuss ethical principles in the context of AI and their significance in developing trustworthy AI solutions. We consider the problem of the categorisation of ethical principles in IT. We concentrate our discussion on privacy, fairness, and explainability. These principles, we believe, meaningfully contribute to the trust of AI systems. We overview the available privacy regulations in the EU and US. We also look at how to achieve compliance with them, including private data detection, data anonymisation techniques and toolkits. From a practical perspective, we analyse fairness and bias problems. We discuss the issue of fairness assessment and metrics. To improve the fairness of AI solutions, an enormous number of techniques have been developed. We also focus on fairness improvement techniques and a few popular toolkits in which these techniques are implemented. Explainability is another ethical principle discussed. It is one of many socially important properties, as it ensures understanding of AI system decision-making and transparency in inspection. Ensuring explainability is important for high-risk applications in healthcare, finance and criminal justice. Finally, we outline approaches that help in the level of explainability. With this review and analysis, we contribute to the knowledge of available techniques and toolkits that can be used by AI practitioners as an initial step in implementing ethical principles into AI solutions.

在人工智能中执行伦理原则:初步讨论
近年来,关于IT和人工智能的道德问题有很多讨论。许多研究人员和组织已经提出了指导方针,以解决隐私、公平和可解释性方面的挑战,以创造值得信赖的人工智能。在本文中,我们讨论了人工智能背景下的伦理原则及其在开发可信赖的人工智能解决方案中的意义。我们考虑资讯科技伦理原则的分类问题。我们集中讨论隐私、公平和可解释性。我们认为,这些原则对人工智能系统的信任有意义。我们概述了欧盟和美国可用的隐私法规。我们还研究了如何实现对它们的遵从性,包括私有数据检测、数据匿名技术和工具包。从实践的角度分析了公平和偏见问题。我们讨论了公平评估和度量的问题。为了提高人工智能解决方案的公平性,已经开发了大量的技术。我们还关注公平性改进技术和一些实现这些技术的流行工具包。可解释性是讨论的另一个伦理原则。它是许多重要的社会属性之一,因为它确保了对人工智能系统决策的理解和检查的透明度。确保可解释性对于医疗保健、金融和刑事司法中的高风险应用非常重要。最后,我们概述了有助于可解释性水平的方法。通过这一回顾和分析,我们为人工智能从业者提供了可用技术和工具包的知识,这些技术和工具包可以作为在人工智能解决方案中实施道德原则的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信