Anurag Wahane, Pradeep Kumar Ghosh, Sri Ram Krishna Mishra
{"title":"Seismic response prediction of irregular buildings using machine learning: a comparative analysis of parametric and non-parametric models","authors":"Anurag Wahane, Pradeep Kumar Ghosh, Sri Ram Krishna Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01388-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increasing demand for aesthetic designs, coupled with limited land availability, has resulted in irregular building configurations that compromise seismic performance. These irregularities can lead to stress concentrations caused by torsional effects and variations in stiffness. This study aims to predict key seismic responses such as natural time period, displacement, and storey drift for geometrically irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. A total of 630 building models were developed and analyzed using ETABS, incorporating input parameters like the structural coefficient (r), building height (H), and irregularity index (β). We applied various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including parametric models such as Multiple Linear Regression, Ridge, and Bayesian Ridge, as well as non-parametric models like Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and Gaussian Regressor. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as R<sup>2</sup>, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and K-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness. Among the models assessed, Gaussian Boosting demonstrated superior performance with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.99347, while Ridge Regression exhibited the lowest accuracy. This study highlights the effectiveness of machine learning techniques, particularly Gaussian and multi-linear models, as accurate, fast, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods of predicting seismic response. In addition, we introduced a graphical user interface (GUI) as a user-friendly tool designed to assist researchers in estimating the seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings. This GUI aims to minimize computational demands and reduce the complexity of analytical procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 9","pages":"3627 - 3655"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01388-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The increasing demand for aesthetic designs, coupled with limited land availability, has resulted in irregular building configurations that compromise seismic performance. These irregularities can lead to stress concentrations caused by torsional effects and variations in stiffness. This study aims to predict key seismic responses such as natural time period, displacement, and storey drift for geometrically irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. A total of 630 building models were developed and analyzed using ETABS, incorporating input parameters like the structural coefficient (r), building height (H), and irregularity index (β). We applied various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including parametric models such as Multiple Linear Regression, Ridge, and Bayesian Ridge, as well as non-parametric models like Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and Gaussian Regressor. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and K-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness. Among the models assessed, Gaussian Boosting demonstrated superior performance with an R2 value of 0.99347, while Ridge Regression exhibited the lowest accuracy. This study highlights the effectiveness of machine learning techniques, particularly Gaussian and multi-linear models, as accurate, fast, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods of predicting seismic response. In addition, we introduced a graphical user interface (GUI) as a user-friendly tool designed to assist researchers in estimating the seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings. This GUI aims to minimize computational demands and reduce the complexity of analytical procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.