Seismic response prediction of irregular buildings using machine learning: a comparative analysis of parametric and non-parametric models

Q2 Engineering
Anurag Wahane, Pradeep Kumar Ghosh, Sri Ram Krishna Mishra
{"title":"Seismic response prediction of irregular buildings using machine learning: a comparative analysis of parametric and non-parametric models","authors":"Anurag Wahane,&nbsp;Pradeep Kumar Ghosh,&nbsp;Sri Ram Krishna Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01388-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increasing demand for aesthetic designs, coupled with limited land availability, has resulted in irregular building configurations that compromise seismic performance. These irregularities can lead to stress concentrations caused by torsional effects and variations in stiffness. This study aims to predict key seismic responses such as natural time period, displacement, and storey drift for geometrically irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. A total of 630 building models were developed and analyzed using ETABS, incorporating input parameters like the structural coefficient (r), building height (H), and irregularity index (β). We applied various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including parametric models such as Multiple Linear Regression, Ridge, and Bayesian Ridge, as well as non-parametric models like Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and Gaussian Regressor. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as R<sup>2</sup>, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and K-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness. Among the models assessed, Gaussian Boosting demonstrated superior performance with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.99347, while Ridge Regression exhibited the lowest accuracy. This study highlights the effectiveness of machine learning techniques, particularly Gaussian and multi-linear models, as accurate, fast, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods of predicting seismic response. In addition, we introduced a graphical user interface (GUI) as a user-friendly tool designed to assist researchers in estimating the seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings. This GUI aims to minimize computational demands and reduce the complexity of analytical procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 9","pages":"3627 - 3655"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01388-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing demand for aesthetic designs, coupled with limited land availability, has resulted in irregular building configurations that compromise seismic performance. These irregularities can lead to stress concentrations caused by torsional effects and variations in stiffness. This study aims to predict key seismic responses such as natural time period, displacement, and storey drift for geometrically irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. A total of 630 building models were developed and analyzed using ETABS, incorporating input parameters like the structural coefficient (r), building height (H), and irregularity index (β). We applied various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including parametric models such as Multiple Linear Regression, Ridge, and Bayesian Ridge, as well as non-parametric models like Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and Gaussian Regressor. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and K-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness. Among the models assessed, Gaussian Boosting demonstrated superior performance with an R2 value of 0.99347, while Ridge Regression exhibited the lowest accuracy. This study highlights the effectiveness of machine learning techniques, particularly Gaussian and multi-linear models, as accurate, fast, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods of predicting seismic response. In addition, we introduced a graphical user interface (GUI) as a user-friendly tool designed to assist researchers in estimating the seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings. This GUI aims to minimize computational demands and reduce the complexity of analytical procedures.

Abstract Image

使用机器学习的不规则建筑物地震反应预测:参数模型和非参数模型的比较分析
对美学设计的需求不断增加,加上土地供应有限,导致不规则的建筑结构影响了抗震性能。这些不规则会导致由扭转效应和刚度变化引起的应力集中。本研究旨在预测几何不规则钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的关键地震反应,如自然时间周期、位移和楼层漂移。利用ETABS软件,采用结构系数(r)、建筑高度(H)和不规则度指数(β)等输入参数,共建立和分析了630个建筑模型。我们应用了各种机器学习(ML)算法,包括参数模型,如多元线性回归、Ridge和贝叶斯Ridge,以及非参数模型,如决策树、随机森林、AdaBoost、XGBoost和高斯回归。使用R2、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方误差(MSE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和K-fold交叉验证等指标评估模型性能,以确保稳健性。在评估的模型中,高斯增强模型的R2值为0.99347,而岭回归模型的准确率最低。这项研究强调了机器学习技术的有效性,特别是高斯和多线性模型,作为预测地震反应的传统方法的准确、快速和经济的替代方法。此外,我们引入了一个图形用户界面(GUI)作为一个用户友好的工具,旨在帮助研究人员估计钢筋混凝土建筑物的抗震能力。该GUI旨在最小化计算需求并降低分析过程的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信