Prediction of ANN, MLR, and NLR models for Compressive strength performance in fly ash based self compacting concrete

Q2 Engineering
Monali Wagh, Sujin George, Sameer Algburi, Charuta Waghmare, Tripti Gupta, Amruta Yadav, Salah J. Mohammed, Ali Majdi
{"title":"Prediction of ANN, MLR, and NLR models for Compressive strength performance in fly ash based self compacting concrete","authors":"Monali Wagh,&nbsp;Sujin George,&nbsp;Sameer Algburi,&nbsp;Charuta Waghmare,&nbsp;Tripti Gupta,&nbsp;Amruta Yadav,&nbsp;Salah J. Mohammed,&nbsp;Ali Majdi","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01385-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Self-compacting concrete (SCC) blended with fly ash (FA) presents a promising low-carbon alternative to traditional concrete, enhancing both workability and long-term durability. Yet, the prediction of its compressive strength (CS) remains challenging due to complex mix interactions. This study presents a comparative modeling framework using Multi-Linear Regression (MLR), Nonlinear Regression (NLR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to estimate the CS of FA-modified SCC based on key input variables: cement (C), water-to-binder ratio (w/b), fly ash content (FA), sand (S), coarse aggregate (CA), and superplasticizer (SPA dataset of 270 mixes was statistically analyzed, divided into 70% training and 30% testing subsets, and validated using R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE. The results revealed that the ANN model outperformed both NLR and MLR, achieving superior accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95, RMSE = 3.49 MPa, MAE = 2.45 MPa) and consistent residual behavior within (± 20%) tolerance bands. In contrast, the NLR and MLR models exhibited broader error ranges and lower predictive reliability. The ANN’s adaptability to nonlinear, multivariate Furthermore, residual error analysis and model robustness across low, medium, and high-strength ranges were evaluated. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of data driven advanced models to resolve the complexities in the modern cementitious materials and thus serve as scientific basis for the improvement of the design of SCC with high performance and high eco-efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 8","pages":"3519 - 3532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01385-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) blended with fly ash (FA) presents a promising low-carbon alternative to traditional concrete, enhancing both workability and long-term durability. Yet, the prediction of its compressive strength (CS) remains challenging due to complex mix interactions. This study presents a comparative modeling framework using Multi-Linear Regression (MLR), Nonlinear Regression (NLR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to estimate the CS of FA-modified SCC based on key input variables: cement (C), water-to-binder ratio (w/b), fly ash content (FA), sand (S), coarse aggregate (CA), and superplasticizer (SPA dataset of 270 mixes was statistically analyzed, divided into 70% training and 30% testing subsets, and validated using R2, RMSE, and MAE. The results revealed that the ANN model outperformed both NLR and MLR, achieving superior accuracy (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 3.49 MPa, MAE = 2.45 MPa) and consistent residual behavior within (± 20%) tolerance bands. In contrast, the NLR and MLR models exhibited broader error ranges and lower predictive reliability. The ANN’s adaptability to nonlinear, multivariate Furthermore, residual error analysis and model robustness across low, medium, and high-strength ranges were evaluated. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of data driven advanced models to resolve the complexities in the modern cementitious materials and thus serve as scientific basis for the improvement of the design of SCC with high performance and high eco-efficiency.

粉煤灰基自密实混凝土抗压强度性能的ANN、MLR和NLR模型预测
自密实混凝土(SCC)与粉煤灰(FA)混合,是传统混凝土的一种有前途的低碳替代品,提高了和易性和长期耐久性。然而,由于复杂的混合相互作用,其抗压强度(CS)的预测仍然具有挑战性。基于水泥(C)、水胶比(w/b)、粉煤灰含量(FA)、砂石(S)、粗骨料(CA)和高效减水剂(SPA)等关键输入变量,对270个混合料的数据集进行统计分析,将其分为70%的训练子集和30%的测试子集,并使用R2、RMSE和MAE进行验证。结果表明,人工神经网络模型优于NLR和MLR,获得了更高的准确率(R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 3.49 MPa, MAE = 2.45 MPa),并且在(±20%)公差范围内保持了一致的残余行为。相比之下,NLR和MLR模型的误差范围更大,预测可靠性更低。此外,对人工神经网络在低、中、高强度范围内的残差分析和模型鲁棒性进行了评估。这些发现证明了数据驱动的先进模型在解决现代胶凝材料复杂性方面的有用性,从而为改进高性能、高生态效率的SCC设计提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信