Prediction and validation of compressive strength of metakaolin-based mortars using machine learning

Q2 Engineering
Eugenia Naranjo, Nestor Ulloa, Kerly Mishell Vaca Vallejo, Rómulo Rivera, Félix García, Miguel Pérez, Byron Gabriel Vaca Vallejo
{"title":"Prediction and validation of compressive strength of metakaolin-based mortars using machine learning","authors":"Eugenia Naranjo,&nbsp;Nestor Ulloa,&nbsp;Kerly Mishell Vaca Vallejo,&nbsp;Rómulo Rivera,&nbsp;Félix García,&nbsp;Miguel Pérez,&nbsp;Byron Gabriel Vaca Vallejo","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01380-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metakaolin (MK)-based cement mortar plays a crucial role in the development of sustainable concrete structures due to its several environmental and performance benefits. It promotes sustainable concrete structures by improving durability, reducing environmental impacts, enhancing material efficiency, and supporting the circular economy in construction.In this research, a comparative study between eight ML classification techniques such as GB, CN2, NB, SVM, SGD, KNN, Tree and RF and one symbolic regression technique such as the RSM has been presented to estimate thecompressive strength of meta-kaolin-based mortarconsidering mixture components contents and its age. A total of 424 records were collected from literature for compressive strength for different mixing ratios of metakaolin-based mortarsat different ages and divided into training set (318 records = 75%) and validation set (106 records = 25%). At the end of the model protocol, SVM andKNN models showed an excellent accuracy of about 92%, while Tree and GB models showed very good accuracies of about 90%. Also, RF and CN2 models showed good accuracy level of about 76–88% and finally NB and SGD produced unacceptable accuracy of less than 60%. Both the correlation matrix and sensitivity analysis results indicated that Age, W/B, and MK/B are the most influential inputs with relative importance of 25% each, then B/S with relative importance of 15%, and SPand Fcem with relative importance of 7% each.Conversely, the RSM model with only two trees and four levels which increased up to four trees and eight levels produced an F value of 32.64, P values less than 0.0500, R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9422 and Adeq Precision of 31.678. This provides a robust framework for optimizing the mix design. The high R<sup>2</sup> indicates that the model explains 94.22% of the variance in the MK-based cement mortar compressive strength, making it highly reliable for predicting concrete performance. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 8","pages":"3423 - 3451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01380-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metakaolin (MK)-based cement mortar plays a crucial role in the development of sustainable concrete structures due to its several environmental and performance benefits. It promotes sustainable concrete structures by improving durability, reducing environmental impacts, enhancing material efficiency, and supporting the circular economy in construction.In this research, a comparative study between eight ML classification techniques such as GB, CN2, NB, SVM, SGD, KNN, Tree and RF and one symbolic regression technique such as the RSM has been presented to estimate thecompressive strength of meta-kaolin-based mortarconsidering mixture components contents and its age. A total of 424 records were collected from literature for compressive strength for different mixing ratios of metakaolin-based mortarsat different ages and divided into training set (318 records = 75%) and validation set (106 records = 25%). At the end of the model protocol, SVM andKNN models showed an excellent accuracy of about 92%, while Tree and GB models showed very good accuracies of about 90%. Also, RF and CN2 models showed good accuracy level of about 76–88% and finally NB and SGD produced unacceptable accuracy of less than 60%. Both the correlation matrix and sensitivity analysis results indicated that Age, W/B, and MK/B are the most influential inputs with relative importance of 25% each, then B/S with relative importance of 15%, and SPand Fcem with relative importance of 7% each.Conversely, the RSM model with only two trees and four levels which increased up to four trees and eight levels produced an F value of 32.64, P values less than 0.0500, R2 of 0.9422 and Adeq Precision of 31.678. This provides a robust framework for optimizing the mix design. The high R2 indicates that the model explains 94.22% of the variance in the MK-based cement mortar compressive strength, making it highly reliable for predicting concrete performance.

Abstract Image

基于机器学习的偏高岭土基砂浆抗压强度预测与验证
偏高岭土(MK)基水泥砂浆由于其多种环保和性能优势,在可持续混凝土结构的发展中起着至关重要的作用。它通过提高耐久性、减少环境影响、提高材料效率和支持建筑中的循环经济来促进可持续混凝土结构。本研究将GB、CN2、NB、SVM、SGD、KNN、Tree和RF等8种ML分类技术与RSM等一种符号回归技术进行了比较研究,以估计考虑混合成分含量和龄期的元高岭土基砂浆的抗压强度。从文献中收集不同掺量比例、不同龄期偏高岭土砂浆的抗压强度记录424条,分为训练集318条= 75%,验证集106条= 25%。在模型协议结束时,SVM和knn模型的准确率达到了92%左右,而Tree和GB模型的准确率达到了90%左右。RF和CN2模型的准确率在76-88%之间,NB和SGD模型的准确率在60%以下。相关矩阵和敏感性分析结果表明,年龄、W/B和MK/B是影响最大的输入,相对重要性各为25%,其次是B/S,相对重要性为15%,SPand Fcem的相对重要性各为7%。相反,仅2棵树4个水平的RSM模型增加到4棵树8个水平,F值为32.64,P值小于0.0500,R2为0.9422,Adeq Precision为31.678。这为优化混合设计提供了一个强大的框架。较高的R2表明,该模型解释了94.22%的mk基水泥砂浆抗压强度方差,对混凝土性能的预测具有很高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信