Spectral Analysis of Humic and Fulvic Acids from Unoxidized and Oxidized Coal

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
K. S. Votolin, S. I. Zherebtsov, K. M. Shpakodraev
{"title":"Spectral Analysis of Humic and Fulvic Acids from Unoxidized and Oxidized Coal","authors":"K. S. Votolin,&nbsp;S. I. Zherebtsov,&nbsp;K. M. Shpakodraev","doi":"10.3103/S1068364X25600332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spectral analysis is employed to compare oxidized and unoxidized coal samples and the humic acids and fulvic acids derived from them. Differences between naturally oxidized and unoxidized coal samples include increased yield of volatiles and humic materials; higher content of analytical moisture, ash. and moisture, and higher total content of oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur (O + N + S); but lower carbon content. The greatest yield of humic materials is observed for oxidized 1B and 2B lignite (70.5%, consisting of 60.9% humic acids and 9.6% fulvic acids). The yield of humic materials is also high for oxidized long-flame D coal (42.4%, consisting of 34.8% humic acids and 7.6% fulvic acids). The yield of humic materials from G coal is minimal: no more than 0.7%. According to Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and CP/MAS <sup>13</sup>C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, the structural group composition of the humic acids is largely determined by the composition of the initial coal. The content of aromatic structure <i>f</i><sub>ar</sub> and the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance <i>f</i><sub>h/h</sub> calculated from the <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectra for the coal samples and humic acids are directly related (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.71 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.81, respectively). The structural group composition of the fulvic acids is largely unaffected by the composition of the initial coal and is more uniform. Overall, <i>f</i><sub>h/h</sub> is higher for oxidized coal than for the corresponding unoxidized coal. The humic acids have a larger content of carbon and aromatic fragments. The fulvic acids have a larger content of oxygen-bearing aliphatic groups. The elemental composition and structural group composition of the humic and fulvic acids from oxidized G and D coal samples are comparable with those for the lignite samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":519,"journal":{"name":"Coke and Chemistry","volume":"68 3","pages":"185 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coke and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1068364X25600332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spectral analysis is employed to compare oxidized and unoxidized coal samples and the humic acids and fulvic acids derived from them. Differences between naturally oxidized and unoxidized coal samples include increased yield of volatiles and humic materials; higher content of analytical moisture, ash. and moisture, and higher total content of oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur (O + N + S); but lower carbon content. The greatest yield of humic materials is observed for oxidized 1B and 2B lignite (70.5%, consisting of 60.9% humic acids and 9.6% fulvic acids). The yield of humic materials is also high for oxidized long-flame D coal (42.4%, consisting of 34.8% humic acids and 7.6% fulvic acids). The yield of humic materials from G coal is minimal: no more than 0.7%. According to Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and CP/MAS 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, the structural group composition of the humic acids is largely determined by the composition of the initial coal. The content of aromatic structure far and the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance fh/h calculated from the 13C NMR spectra for the coal samples and humic acids are directly related (R2 = 0.71 and R2 = 0.81, respectively). The structural group composition of the fulvic acids is largely unaffected by the composition of the initial coal and is more uniform. Overall, fh/h is higher for oxidized coal than for the corresponding unoxidized coal. The humic acids have a larger content of carbon and aromatic fragments. The fulvic acids have a larger content of oxygen-bearing aliphatic groups. The elemental composition and structural group composition of the humic and fulvic acids from oxidized G and D coal samples are comparable with those for the lignite samples.

Abstract Image

未氧化和氧化煤中腐植酸和黄腐酸的光谱分析
光谱分析用于比较氧化和未氧化煤样品及其衍生的腐植酸和黄腐酸。自然氧化和未氧化煤样品之间的差异包括挥发性物质和腐殖质物质的产量增加;分析水分、灰分含量较高。氧、氮、硫(O + N + S)总含量较高;但是碳含量更低。1B和2B氧化褐煤腐植酸产率最高,为70.5%,其中腐植酸为60.9%,黄腐酸为9.6%。长焰D煤的腐殖物收率也较高,达42.4%,其中腐殖酸占34.8%,腐殖酸占7.6%。G煤的腐殖质产率极低,不超过0.7%。傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱和CP/MAS 13C核磁共振(NMR)光谱表明,腐植酸的结构基团组成在很大程度上取决于初始煤的组成。煤样与腐殖酸的13C NMR谱计算出的亲疏水平衡fh/h与芳香族结构far的含量直接相关(R2 = 0.71, R2 = 0.81)。黄腐酸的结构基团组成在很大程度上不受初始煤组成的影响,而且更均匀。总的来说,氧化煤比相应的未氧化煤的fh/h高。腐植酸含有较多的碳和芳香碎片。黄腐酸含有较多的含氧脂肪族。G煤和D煤氧化样品腐殖酸和黄腐酸的元素组成和结构基团组成与褐煤样品相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coke and Chemistry
Coke and Chemistry ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scientific developments and applications in the field of coal beneficiation and preparation for coking, coking processes, design of coking ovens and equipment, by-product recovery, automation of technological processes, ecology and economics. It also presents indispensable information on the scientific events devoted to thermal rectification, use of smokeless coal as an energy source, and manufacture of different liquid and solid chemical products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信