Health impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Heidi Lynch , Ian Holdroyd , Martin Birley , Daniel Black , Ben Cave , Margaret Douglas , Rowena Ekermawi , Liz Green , Fiona Haigh , Ben Harris-Roxas , Monica O'Mullane , Joanna Purdy , Anna Stevenson , Salim Vohra , John Ford
{"title":"Health impact assessments should be mandatory for all relevant government policies","authors":"Heidi Lynch ,&nbsp;Ian Holdroyd ,&nbsp;Martin Birley ,&nbsp;Daniel Black ,&nbsp;Ben Cave ,&nbsp;Margaret Douglas ,&nbsp;Rowena Ekermawi ,&nbsp;Liz Green ,&nbsp;Fiona Haigh ,&nbsp;Ben Harris-Roxas ,&nbsp;Monica O'Mullane ,&nbsp;Joanna Purdy ,&nbsp;Anna Stevenson ,&nbsp;Salim Vohra ,&nbsp;John Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consistent and systematic integration of health considerations in upstream political decision making is needed to improve population health and enhance health equity. Previous research supports the effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments (HIA), as a key component of a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach, demonstrating its ability to influence cross-government policies that affect health and health equity. HiAP is an approach to embedding health and health equity in multi-sector decision making. Despite proven potential, HIA has historically been used sporadically and opportunistically rather than as a part of routine policy making. Here we argue that mandatory HIA in national policy, as part of an overall HiAP approach, is needed to achieve effective and sustained cross-government action on health and equity. Implementing mandatory HIAs would ensure that health considerations are routinely evaluated in policy decisions, enabling governments to proactively address health disparities and improve public well-being. Harnessing the benefits of HIA requires political commitment to an evidence-informed approach to population health, with dedicated civil service support, and a mandatory screening and assessment process for significant policies. A systematic and obligatory approach would foster accountability, enhance policy coherence and ultimately promote health and equity. It would also send a clear message that consideration of health is a non-negotiable in every policy decision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consistent and systematic integration of health considerations in upstream political decision making is needed to improve population health and enhance health equity. Previous research supports the effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments (HIA), as a key component of a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach, demonstrating its ability to influence cross-government policies that affect health and health equity. HiAP is an approach to embedding health and health equity in multi-sector decision making. Despite proven potential, HIA has historically been used sporadically and opportunistically rather than as a part of routine policy making. Here we argue that mandatory HIA in national policy, as part of an overall HiAP approach, is needed to achieve effective and sustained cross-government action on health and equity. Implementing mandatory HIAs would ensure that health considerations are routinely evaluated in policy decisions, enabling governments to proactively address health disparities and improve public well-being. Harnessing the benefits of HIA requires political commitment to an evidence-informed approach to population health, with dedicated civil service support, and a mandatory screening and assessment process for significant policies. A systematic and obligatory approach would foster accountability, enhance policy coherence and ultimately promote health and equity. It would also send a clear message that consideration of health is a non-negotiable in every policy decision.
健康影响评估应该是所有相关政府政策的强制性内容
需要在上游政治决策中一贯和系统地纳入卫生方面的考虑,以改善人口健康和加强卫生公平。先前的研究支持健康影响评估(HIA)的有效性,它是“全民健康政策”(HiAP)方法的一个关键组成部分,表明它有能力影响影响健康和卫生公平的跨政府政策。HiAP是将卫生和卫生公平纳入多部门决策的一种方法。尽管证明了HIA的潜力,但从历史上看,HIA只是偶尔和机会主义地使用,而不是作为常规政策制定的一部分。在此,我们认为,必须将强制性HIA纳入国家政策,作为HiAP总体方法的一部分,以实现有效和持续的跨政府卫生和公平行动。实施强制性健康评价将确保在政策决定中定期评估健康方面的考虑,使政府能够主动解决健康差距问题,改善公众福祉。利用HIA的好处需要政治上的承诺,对人口健康采取循证方法,有专门的公务员支持,并对重大政策进行强制性的筛选和评估程序。系统和强制性的做法将促进问责制,加强政策一致性,并最终促进健康和公平。它还将发出一个明确的信息,即在每项政策决定中对健康的考虑都是不容谈判的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信