Dual regulatory mechanisms and boundary conditions of digital transformation on open innovation: A supply chain dynamic characteristics perspective

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Qinwei Cao , Yu Qian , LinFeng Zhong , Qiaoyu Meng
{"title":"Dual regulatory mechanisms and boundary conditions of digital transformation on open innovation: A supply chain dynamic characteristics perspective","authors":"Qinwei Cao ,&nbsp;Yu Qian ,&nbsp;LinFeng Zhong ,&nbsp;Qiaoyu Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital transformation is widely recognized as a catalyst for corporate innovation. Existing research exhibits significant theoretical gaps in elucidating the synergistic mechanisms and contextual dependencies between digital transformation and open innovation, particularly in accounting for supply chain dynamics. Moving beyond unilateral effect analyses, this study integrates transaction cost economics and resource dependence theory to develop a novel <em>digital transformation–supply chain characteristics–open innovation</em> framework. Leveraging panel data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies, this paper empirically investigates how digital transformation impacts open innovation and uncovers the dual regulatory roles of supply chain concentration and efficiency. Key findings reveal: (1) Digital transformation significantly enhances open innovation levels through the synergistic reduction of transaction costs and resource dependence constraints, (2) Supply chain concentration weakens the positive impact due to transaction lock-in effects and innovation path dependence, (3) High supply chain efficiency paradoxically suppresses digital innovation dividends by reinforcing resource dependence and organizational inertia. This research contributes a pioneering <em>d</em><em>igital-</em><em>s</em><em>upply chain</em> collaborative innovation paradigm, offering a dynamic characteristics-based explanatory framework for resolving the digital innovation paradox. Our findings provide critical theoretical and practical insights for building resilient innovation ecosystems in the digital economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103085"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002751","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital transformation is widely recognized as a catalyst for corporate innovation. Existing research exhibits significant theoretical gaps in elucidating the synergistic mechanisms and contextual dependencies between digital transformation and open innovation, particularly in accounting for supply chain dynamics. Moving beyond unilateral effect analyses, this study integrates transaction cost economics and resource dependence theory to develop a novel digital transformation–supply chain characteristics–open innovation framework. Leveraging panel data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies, this paper empirically investigates how digital transformation impacts open innovation and uncovers the dual regulatory roles of supply chain concentration and efficiency. Key findings reveal: (1) Digital transformation significantly enhances open innovation levels through the synergistic reduction of transaction costs and resource dependence constraints, (2) Supply chain concentration weakens the positive impact due to transaction lock-in effects and innovation path dependence, (3) High supply chain efficiency paradoxically suppresses digital innovation dividends by reinforcing resource dependence and organizational inertia. This research contributes a pioneering digital-supply chain collaborative innovation paradigm, offering a dynamic characteristics-based explanatory framework for resolving the digital innovation paradox. Our findings provide critical theoretical and practical insights for building resilient innovation ecosystems in the digital economy.
开放式创新数字化转型的双重监管机制与边界条件:供应链动态特征视角
数字化转型被广泛认为是企业创新的催化剂。现有研究在阐明数字化转型与开放式创新之间的协同机制和上下文依赖关系方面存在显著的理论空白,特别是在供应链动态核算方面。本文超越单边效应分析,将交易成本经济学和资源依赖理论相结合,构建了一个新的数字化转型-供应链特征-开放式创新框架。本文利用沪深两市a股上市公司面板数据,实证研究了数字化转型对开放式创新的影响,揭示了供应链集中度和效率的双重调控作用。主要研究结果表明:(1)数字化转型通过协同降低交易成本和资源依赖约束显著提高开放式创新水平;(2)供应链集中度由于交易锁定效应和创新路径依赖而削弱了开放式创新的正向影响;(3)供应链高效率通过强化资源依赖和组织惯性而矛盾地抑制了数字创新红利。本研究提供了一个开创性的数字供应链协同创新范式,为解决数字创新悖论提供了一个基于动态特征的解释框架。我们的研究结果为在数字经济中建立有弹性的创新生态系统提供了重要的理论和实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信