Exploring the impact of US-China tensions on innovation outputs: The moderating role of the financial sectors in both countries

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Che Fang , Runguo Xu
{"title":"Exploring the impact of US-China tensions on innovation outputs: The moderating role of the financial sectors in both countries","authors":"Che Fang ,&nbsp;Runguo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating geopolitical tensions between the United States and China have sparked considerable debate about their implications for global innovation and economic stability. This study examines the impact of these tensions on innovation performance, specifically focusing on trademark output and exports of information and communication technology products. It further explores how financial sector development moderates this relationship. Using annual data from 1993 to 2023 and applying Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimation techniques, the findings reveal that United States–China tensions positively influence innovation outputs in both countries. Specifically, a one-unit increase in geopolitical tension is associated with a 0.005–0.006 increase in trademark output and a 0.008–0.010 rise in information and communication technology exports. Financial sector development independently contributes positively to innovation; however, its interaction with geopolitical tensions exhibits divergent effects. In the United States, financial development strengthens the positive impact of tensions on innovation. In contrast, for China, the interaction term is significantly negative (−0.331 to −0.427), suggesting that financial sector development may exacerbate the adverse effects of geopolitical uncertainty on innovation. These findings highlight the complex, country-specific dynamics between finance, innovation, and global political relations. The study offers critical insights for policymakers in both countries, urging tailored financial and innovation policies in the face of sustained geopolitical rivalry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103061"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The escalating geopolitical tensions between the United States and China have sparked considerable debate about their implications for global innovation and economic stability. This study examines the impact of these tensions on innovation performance, specifically focusing on trademark output and exports of information and communication technology products. It further explores how financial sector development moderates this relationship. Using annual data from 1993 to 2023 and applying Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimation techniques, the findings reveal that United States–China tensions positively influence innovation outputs in both countries. Specifically, a one-unit increase in geopolitical tension is associated with a 0.005–0.006 increase in trademark output and a 0.008–0.010 rise in information and communication technology exports. Financial sector development independently contributes positively to innovation; however, its interaction with geopolitical tensions exhibits divergent effects. In the United States, financial development strengthens the positive impact of tensions on innovation. In contrast, for China, the interaction term is significantly negative (−0.331 to −0.427), suggesting that financial sector development may exacerbate the adverse effects of geopolitical uncertainty on innovation. These findings highlight the complex, country-specific dynamics between finance, innovation, and global political relations. The study offers critical insights for policymakers in both countries, urging tailored financial and innovation policies in the face of sustained geopolitical rivalry.
探讨中美紧张关系对创新产出的影响:两国金融部门的调节作用
美国和中国之间不断升级的地缘政治紧张局势引发了有关其对全球创新和经济稳定影响的大量辩论。本研究考察了这些紧张关系对创新绩效的影响,特别关注商标产出和信息和通信技术产品的出口。本文进一步探讨了金融部门的发展如何调节这种关系。利用1993年至2023年的年度数据,并应用完全修正普通最小二乘(FMOLS)和动态普通最小二乘(DOLS)估计技术,研究结果表明,中美紧张关系对两国的创新产出都有积极影响。具体而言,地缘政治紧张局势每增加1个单位,商标产出就会增加0.005-0.006,信息和通信技术出口就会增加0.008-0.010。金融自主发展对创新有积极作用;然而,它与地缘政治紧张局势的相互作用表现出不同的效果。在美国,金融发展加强了紧张局势对创新的积极影响。相比之下,对于中国,交互项显著为负(- 0.331至- 0.427),表明金融部门的发展可能加剧地缘政治不确定性对创新的不利影响。这些发现突出了金融、创新和全球政治关系之间复杂的、具体国家的动态关系。这项研究为两国的政策制定者提供了重要的见解,敦促他们在面对持续的地缘政治竞争时制定有针对性的金融和创新政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信