Eight strategies for human–wolf coexistence and their application to Swiss governance gaps

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Maximilian Meyer
{"title":"Eight strategies for human–wolf coexistence and their application to Swiss governance gaps","authors":"Maximilian Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing conservation efforts have led to increases in wolf populations in Europe. However, the resulting conservation conflicts erode conservation support when farmers and rural citizens fear for their livelihoods. Fostering human–wolf coexistence can be achieved through a variety of strategies. By using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, I provide a general policy perspective on strategies for human–wolf coexistence. These can be synthesised into eight strategies and include: (1) wolf habitat and population management, (2) scientific research and exchange, (3) education and awareness, (4) farm-level livestock protection (including new technologies), (5) resolution and mediation of conservation conflicts, (6) community-based conservation and (7) financial instruments. These strategies need to be embedded into (8) legal protection frameworks and policies. I then identify missing strategies and emerging opportunities for wolf conservation in Switzerland specifically, which is a relevant case study due to mounting opposition among rural citizens. I suggest that two strategies in Switzerland’s approach to human–wolf coexistence are missing, which can create sustained co-benefits for both humans, especially farmers, and wolves: financial instruments (including benefit sharing and conservation performance payments) and community-based conservation. These findings aim at stimulating scientific debate as well as exploring their applicability in Switzerland through policy for a holistic approach to human–wolf coexistence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article e03870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing conservation efforts have led to increases in wolf populations in Europe. However, the resulting conservation conflicts erode conservation support when farmers and rural citizens fear for their livelihoods. Fostering human–wolf coexistence can be achieved through a variety of strategies. By using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, I provide a general policy perspective on strategies for human–wolf coexistence. These can be synthesised into eight strategies and include: (1) wolf habitat and population management, (2) scientific research and exchange, (3) education and awareness, (4) farm-level livestock protection (including new technologies), (5) resolution and mediation of conservation conflicts, (6) community-based conservation and (7) financial instruments. These strategies need to be embedded into (8) legal protection frameworks and policies. I then identify missing strategies and emerging opportunities for wolf conservation in Switzerland specifically, which is a relevant case study due to mounting opposition among rural citizens. I suggest that two strategies in Switzerland’s approach to human–wolf coexistence are missing, which can create sustained co-benefits for both humans, especially farmers, and wolves: financial instruments (including benefit sharing and conservation performance payments) and community-based conservation. These findings aim at stimulating scientific debate as well as exploring their applicability in Switzerland through policy for a holistic approach to human–wolf coexistence.
人狼共存的八项策略及其在瑞士治理缺口中的应用
越来越多的保护措施导致欧洲狼的数量增加。然而,当农民和农村居民担心他们的生计时,由此产生的保护冲突削弱了对保护的支持。促进人狼共存可以通过多种策略来实现。通过使用制度分析与发展(IAD)框架,我提供了一个关于人狼共存策略的一般政策视角。这些策略可以综合为8个策略,包括:(1)狼的栖息地和种群管理,(2)科学研究和交流,(3)教育和意识,(4)农场一级的牲畜保护(包括新技术),(5)保护冲突的解决和调解,(6)社区保护和(7)金融工具。这些战略需要纳入法律保护框架和政策。然后,我特别指出了瑞士狼群保护的缺失策略和新出现的机会,这是一个相关的案例研究,因为农村居民的反对呼声越来越高。我认为,瑞士在人狼共存的方法中缺少两种策略,这两种策略可以为人类,特别是农民和狼创造持续的共同利益:金融工具(包括利益分享和保护绩效支付)和以社区为基础的保护。这些发现旨在激发科学辩论,并通过对人狼共存的整体方法的政策探索其在瑞士的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信