The dynamic changes and complex relationships of sustainable development goals in Tibet

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Xian Li , Erfu Dai , Jun Yin , Lizhi Jia , Lin Zhao
{"title":"The dynamic changes and complex relationships of sustainable development goals in Tibet","authors":"Xian Li ,&nbsp;Erfu Dai ,&nbsp;Jun Yin ,&nbsp;Lizhi Jia ,&nbsp;Lin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Balancing socioeconomic progress with environmental conservation is a main challenge to sustainable development in less developed regions. To advance regional sustainable development, it is essential to understand the dynamics of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), identify synergies and trade-offs among them, and strive to enhance the former while reducing the latter. In this study, we selected 17 SDG indicators to establish an evaluation framework for measuring SDGs progress at the county level in Tibet from 2015 to 2022. Then Spearman correlation analysis was applied to explore the complex relationships among the SDGs. The results indicated that Tibet's sustainable development level showed a gradual upward trend overall from 2015 to 2022, while the scores were still low, with an average SDG score of 35.48 in 2022. The gap between SDG indicators was large, except SDG 13.2.2 (Carbon dioxide emissions), SDG 6.3.1 (Per capita annual quantity of waste-water discharged), and SDG 11.6.2 (Annual mean concentration of PM<sub>2.5</sub>), the rest of SDG indicators scored low. Counties with lower scores were primarily concentrated in the Qiangtang Plateau. In conjunction with the Moran's <em>I</em>, the spatial correlation among different counties weakened over time. The unevenness existed in sustainable development, and there were obvious differences among counties for the same SDG indicator. The interaction analysis showed that there were 23 synergies and 18 trade-offs among the 67 pairs of SDG indicators. From 2015 to 2022, the number of synergies increased from 14 to 20, and trade-offs from 11 to 18. This study provides a theoretical foundation for ecological civilization construction in Tibet and offers decision-making references for the sustainable development of economically underdeveloped regions with good ecological conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 103797"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002942","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Balancing socioeconomic progress with environmental conservation is a main challenge to sustainable development in less developed regions. To advance regional sustainable development, it is essential to understand the dynamics of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), identify synergies and trade-offs among them, and strive to enhance the former while reducing the latter. In this study, we selected 17 SDG indicators to establish an evaluation framework for measuring SDGs progress at the county level in Tibet from 2015 to 2022. Then Spearman correlation analysis was applied to explore the complex relationships among the SDGs. The results indicated that Tibet's sustainable development level showed a gradual upward trend overall from 2015 to 2022, while the scores were still low, with an average SDG score of 35.48 in 2022. The gap between SDG indicators was large, except SDG 13.2.2 (Carbon dioxide emissions), SDG 6.3.1 (Per capita annual quantity of waste-water discharged), and SDG 11.6.2 (Annual mean concentration of PM2.5), the rest of SDG indicators scored low. Counties with lower scores were primarily concentrated in the Qiangtang Plateau. In conjunction with the Moran's I, the spatial correlation among different counties weakened over time. The unevenness existed in sustainable development, and there were obvious differences among counties for the same SDG indicator. The interaction analysis showed that there were 23 synergies and 18 trade-offs among the 67 pairs of SDG indicators. From 2015 to 2022, the number of synergies increased from 14 to 20, and trade-offs from 11 to 18. This study provides a theoretical foundation for ecological civilization construction in Tibet and offers decision-making references for the sustainable development of economically underdeveloped regions with good ecological conditions.

Abstract Image

平衡社会经济发展与环境保护是欠发达地区可持续发展面临的主要挑战。为推进区域可持续发展,必须了解可持续发展目标的动态,确定其协同作用和权衡,努力增强前者,减少后者。然后运用Spearman相关分析探讨可持续发展目标之间的复杂关系。2022年48岁。SDG各指标之间差距较大,除SDG 13.2.2(二氧化碳排放量)、SDG 6.3.1(人均年污水排放量)和SDG 11.6.2 (PM2.5年平均浓度)外,其余指标得分均较低。得分较低的县主要集中在羌塘高原。与Moran’s I相结合,不同县之间的空间相关性随着时间的推移而减弱。可持续发展存在不均衡现象,同一可持续发展指标国家间存在明显差异。相互作用分析表明,在67对可持续发展目标指标中存在23个协同效应和18个权衡。从2015年到2022年,协同效应从14个增加到20个,权衡从11个增加到18个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信