Tamilwai J. Kolowa , Matthias Weigand , Ines Standfuß , Sebastian Klüsener , Nik Lomax , Hannes Taubenböck
{"title":"Is Germany experiencing urban or suburban growth? Contrasting long-standing and novel urban gradient classifications","authors":"Tamilwai J. Kolowa , Matthias Weigand , Ines Standfuß , Sebastian Klüsener , Nik Lomax , Hannes Taubenböck","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding population shifts along urban-rural gradients is crucial for informed decision-making in sustainable spatial planning. Empirical accounts of urbanization and suburbanization rely on classification choices, typically derived from administrative units. Recently, novel classification approaches based on remote sensing and high-resolution population data have gained relevance. This trend, driven by methodological advancements, raises the question of whether these new approaches yield similar or different results in comparative analyses along urban-rural gradients. Our paper explores how classification choices affect assessments of population trends along the urban-rural gradient at both the national and subnational regional scales. We contrast three urban gradient classifications to analyze population change in 50 German metropolitan regions from 2011 to 2022. Results indicate that, at the national scale, observed trends in urban, suburban, and peri-urban areas are consistent across all classifications. For Germany, we find that urban areas have registered higher growth rates than suburban and peri-urban areas across all classifications. However, at the regional scale, observed trends partially depend on classification choices, suggesting that regional findings are particularly sensitive to the chosen classification scheme. The methodological framework presented here can also be applied to other geographical contexts for which similar data are available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 103779"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding population shifts along urban-rural gradients is crucial for informed decision-making in sustainable spatial planning. Empirical accounts of urbanization and suburbanization rely on classification choices, typically derived from administrative units. Recently, novel classification approaches based on remote sensing and high-resolution population data have gained relevance. This trend, driven by methodological advancements, raises the question of whether these new approaches yield similar or different results in comparative analyses along urban-rural gradients. Our paper explores how classification choices affect assessments of population trends along the urban-rural gradient at both the national and subnational regional scales. We contrast three urban gradient classifications to analyze population change in 50 German metropolitan regions from 2011 to 2022. Results indicate that, at the national scale, observed trends in urban, suburban, and peri-urban areas are consistent across all classifications. For Germany, we find that urban areas have registered higher growth rates than suburban and peri-urban areas across all classifications. However, at the regional scale, observed trends partially depend on classification choices, suggesting that regional findings are particularly sensitive to the chosen classification scheme. The methodological framework presented here can also be applied to other geographical contexts for which similar data are available.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.