Zoé Bollen , Annika M. Wyss , Emmanuel Guizar Rosales , Zarah Le Houcq Corbi , Daria Knoch
{"title":"The role of attitudes and attention in pro-environmental decision-making: An eye-tracking study","authors":"Zoé Bollen , Annika M. Wyss , Emmanuel Guizar Rosales , Zarah Le Houcq Corbi , Daria Knoch","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Encouraging environmentally sustainable lifestyles demands a deeper understanding of the processes underlying pro-environmental decision-making. This study investigates the role of environmental attitudes and attentional processes using eye-tracking technology during a decision-making task that involves real trade-offs between personal financial rewards and environmental consequences. We found partial evidence that stronger environmental attitudes – derived from the Campbell paradigm, but not from biospheric values – predicted an attentional prioritization of environmental information (i.e., carbon emissions). Specifically, stronger Campbellian attitudes were associated with a higher proportion of fixation time on this information, and an increasing likelihood of fixating this information first once participants became familiar with the task. However, the former effect may partly reflect gender-related differences in ecological considerations. The attention-behavior link appears context-dependent, influenced by factors such as the magnitude of financial incentives and environmental stakes. Our findings suggest that, while attentional processes may play a significant role in less financially rewarding pro-environmental decisions, they do not predict those with high financial stakes. These insights underscore the importance of considering both attentional dynamics and decision context in developing strategies to promote pro-environmental choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102776"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Encouraging environmentally sustainable lifestyles demands a deeper understanding of the processes underlying pro-environmental decision-making. This study investigates the role of environmental attitudes and attentional processes using eye-tracking technology during a decision-making task that involves real trade-offs between personal financial rewards and environmental consequences. We found partial evidence that stronger environmental attitudes – derived from the Campbell paradigm, but not from biospheric values – predicted an attentional prioritization of environmental information (i.e., carbon emissions). Specifically, stronger Campbellian attitudes were associated with a higher proportion of fixation time on this information, and an increasing likelihood of fixating this information first once participants became familiar with the task. However, the former effect may partly reflect gender-related differences in ecological considerations. The attention-behavior link appears context-dependent, influenced by factors such as the magnitude of financial incentives and environmental stakes. Our findings suggest that, while attentional processes may play a significant role in less financially rewarding pro-environmental decisions, they do not predict those with high financial stakes. These insights underscore the importance of considering both attentional dynamics and decision context in developing strategies to promote pro-environmental choices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space