“Now that I'm here, I actually have the stability and the time to really think about stuff like that”: Perspectives on medications for opioid use disorder in low-threshold harm reduction housing

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Avik Chatterjee , Sabrina S. Rapisarda , Joseph Silcox , Sofia Zaragoza , Charlie Summers , Andrew Rolles , Sarah Kosakowski , Traci C. Green
{"title":"“Now that I'm here, I actually have the stability and the time to really think about stuff like that”: Perspectives on medications for opioid use disorder in low-threshold harm reduction housing","authors":"Avik Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Sabrina S. Rapisarda ,&nbsp;Joseph Silcox ,&nbsp;Sofia Zaragoza ,&nbsp;Charlie Summers ,&nbsp;Andrew Rolles ,&nbsp;Sarah Kosakowski ,&nbsp;Traci C. Green","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sweeping of encampments is one policy approach to the growing visibility of homelessness and substance use in U.S. cities but is associated with increased overdose deaths. In 2022, to mitigate the impacts of a sweep, the City of Boston created seven harm reduction housing (HRH) sites to accommodate displaced individuals. HRH sites offered on-site or off-site medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). As part of a broader parent study, we recruited 28 residents from HRH sites previously enrolled in a survey for semi-structured interviews, exploring their experiences with housing, the current HRH site, substance use, service access, overdose, MOUD, and more. We engaged in an inductive thematic analysis of the MOUD interview data. Four themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) HRH sites afforded participants on-site access and linkages that facilitated MOUD initiation and retention; (2) when off-site, location, transportation and accessibility issues limited MOUD access; (3) MOUD prescribing policies at HRH sites were uniquely low-threshold; and (4) HRH-related MOUD engagement shaped health-related outcomes. Participants reported that HRH facilitated ease of access and delivery of MOUD both on and off site, raised considerations about how MOUD is accessed through HRH, and described how MOUD through HRH changed their substance use behaviors, health, and quality of life. Government entities that opt to clear encampments as a policy approach to address homelessness and substance use should also implement HRH interventions that facilitate MOUD access in conjunction. Such an approach would mitigate known harms associated with sweeps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 209810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sweeping of encampments is one policy approach to the growing visibility of homelessness and substance use in U.S. cities but is associated with increased overdose deaths. In 2022, to mitigate the impacts of a sweep, the City of Boston created seven harm reduction housing (HRH) sites to accommodate displaced individuals. HRH sites offered on-site or off-site medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). As part of a broader parent study, we recruited 28 residents from HRH sites previously enrolled in a survey for semi-structured interviews, exploring their experiences with housing, the current HRH site, substance use, service access, overdose, MOUD, and more. We engaged in an inductive thematic analysis of the MOUD interview data. Four themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) HRH sites afforded participants on-site access and linkages that facilitated MOUD initiation and retention; (2) when off-site, location, transportation and accessibility issues limited MOUD access; (3) MOUD prescribing policies at HRH sites were uniquely low-threshold; and (4) HRH-related MOUD engagement shaped health-related outcomes. Participants reported that HRH facilitated ease of access and delivery of MOUD both on and off site, raised considerations about how MOUD is accessed through HRH, and described how MOUD through HRH changed their substance use behaviors, health, and quality of life. Government entities that opt to clear encampments as a policy approach to address homelessness and substance use should also implement HRH interventions that facilitate MOUD access in conjunction. Such an approach would mitigate known harms associated with sweeps.
“现在我在这里,我实际上有了稳定和时间来真正思考这样的事情”:低阈值减害住房中阿片类药物使用障碍药物的观点
清理营地是解决美国城市中无家可归和吸毒问题日益突出的一种政策方法,但与吸毒过量死亡人数的增加有关。2022年,为了减轻清扫的影响,波士顿市创建了7个减少伤害的住房(HRH)点,以容纳流离失所的人。HRH网站提供现场或非现场药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)。作为更广泛的家长研究的一部分,我们招募了28名来自HRH站点的居民进行半结构化访谈,探索他们在住房,当前HRH站点,物质使用,服务获取,过量使用,mod等方面的经历。我们对mod采访数据进行了归纳性专题分析。从专题分析中得出了四个主题:(1)人力资源网站为参与者提供了现场访问和联系,促进了mod的发起和保留;(2)当非现场、地点、交通和可达性问题限制mod访问时;(3)医院处方政策具有独特的低阈值;(4)与健康相关的mod参与塑造了健康相关的结果。参与者报告说,HRH促进了在现场和非现场获取和提供mod的便利性,提出了关于如何通过HRH获取mod的考虑,并描述了通过HRH获得mod如何改变他们的药物使用行为、健康和生活质量。选择将清理营地作为解决无家可归和药物使用问题的政策方法的政府实体也应实施促进mod访问的人力资源干预措施。这种方法将减轻已知的与扫荡有关的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信