Generating realistic pruning solutions for automated grape vine pruning using graph neural networks

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Jaco Fourie , Jeffrey Hsiao , Oliver Batchelor , Kevin Langbroek , Henry Williams , Richard Green , Armin Werner
{"title":"Generating realistic pruning solutions for automated grape vine pruning using graph neural networks","authors":"Jaco Fourie ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Hsiao ,&nbsp;Oliver Batchelor ,&nbsp;Kevin Langbroek ,&nbsp;Henry Williams ,&nbsp;Richard Green ,&nbsp;Armin Werner","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In our prior work we showed that graph neural networks (GNNs) can be trained to generate pruning solutions that could direct robotic pruning robots to perform automated cane pruning of wine grape vines. That study introduced the feasibility of the technology but also showed that there were many open questions and issues with the research results that needed to be addressed. In this study we address some of these questions. For example, we answer the question of how would a model like this perform on real vine architectures compared with pruning solutions from real experienced pruners. Our most notable contributions include moving away from a per-cane classification model that attempts to define a single <em>perfect</em> pruning solution, to a model that ranks multiple good solutions and picks the best one. We addressed a key limitation of the previous training data by moving away from synthetic vine architectures to realistic ones recorded from real vines and using pruning solutions collected by expert pruners as our ground-truth. Our primary goal was to show that learning by example using a GNN-based model was a viable approach to automated pruning, even when compared with experienced pruners. We showed robust performance from our model by training on a dataset of 90 pruning solutions generated by expert pruners in the 2022 season, and testing our performance on 117 pruning solutions from an independent set of pruners from the 2021 season. The model was able to correctly score all the pruning solutions from the 2021 dataset as <em>good</em> to <em>very good</em> and none of the expert solutions were classified as <em>poor</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"298 ","pages":"Article 129778"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425033937","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our prior work we showed that graph neural networks (GNNs) can be trained to generate pruning solutions that could direct robotic pruning robots to perform automated cane pruning of wine grape vines. That study introduced the feasibility of the technology but also showed that there were many open questions and issues with the research results that needed to be addressed. In this study we address some of these questions. For example, we answer the question of how would a model like this perform on real vine architectures compared with pruning solutions from real experienced pruners. Our most notable contributions include moving away from a per-cane classification model that attempts to define a single perfect pruning solution, to a model that ranks multiple good solutions and picks the best one. We addressed a key limitation of the previous training data by moving away from synthetic vine architectures to realistic ones recorded from real vines and using pruning solutions collected by expert pruners as our ground-truth. Our primary goal was to show that learning by example using a GNN-based model was a viable approach to automated pruning, even when compared with experienced pruners. We showed robust performance from our model by training on a dataset of 90 pruning solutions generated by expert pruners in the 2022 season, and testing our performance on 117 pruning solutions from an independent set of pruners from the 2021 season. The model was able to correctly score all the pruning solutions from the 2021 dataset as good to very good and none of the expert solutions were classified as poor.
使用图神经网络为自动葡萄藤修剪生成现实的修剪解决方案
在我们之前的工作中,我们展示了可以训练图神经网络(gnn)来生成修剪解决方案,这些解决方案可以指导机器人修剪机器人对葡萄酒葡萄藤进行自动的甘蔗修剪。该研究介绍了该技术的可行性,但也表明,研究结果有许多悬而未决的问题和问题需要解决。在这项研究中,我们解决了其中的一些问题。例如,我们回答了这样一个问题,即与真正有经验的修剪师的修剪解决方案相比,这样的模型在真实的葡萄树架构上的表现如何。我们最值得注意的贡献包括从试图定义单个完美修剪解决方案的每棵树分类模型转变为对多个好的解决方案进行排名并选择最佳解决方案的模型。我们解决了以前的训练数据的一个关键限制,从合成的藤结构转移到从真实的藤记录的现实的,并使用修剪专家收集的修剪解决方案作为我们的基础事实。我们的主要目标是表明,使用基于gnn的模型进行示例学习是一种可行的自动修剪方法,即使与有经验的修剪器相比也是如此。我们通过在2022年修剪专家生成的90个修剪解决方案的数据集上进行训练,并在2021年修剪专家生成的117个修剪解决方案上测试了我们的模型的稳健性能。该模型能够正确地将2021年数据集中的所有修剪解决方案评分为好到非常好,并且没有一个专家解决方案被归类为差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信