The changing role of the state: two governance models of China’s low-carbon energy transitions

IF 6.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kejia Yang , Kaidong Feng
{"title":"The changing role of the state: two governance models of China’s low-carbon energy transitions","authors":"Kejia Yang ,&nbsp;Kaidong Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2025.101057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper examines the changing role of the state in sustainability transitions by exploring how governance structures co-evolve with different transition pathways. Using the case of China’s green energy transitions, we compare two distinct governance structures that have emerged in two Chinese provinces. The analysis challenges the dominant narrative that China’s transitions are exclusively state-led, demonstrating that divergent governance structures can emerge at the subnational level. Specifically, we identify two models: one that adheres to a centralised power system, referred to as the developmental state model; the other departs from the existing model by building more distributed energy systems driven by a wide range of actors, referred to as ‘distributed governance structures’. While it remains uncertain whether these two models will complement or compete each other in the future, they represent two divergent transition pathways that could shape China’s future low-carbon development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101057"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422425000966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the changing role of the state in sustainability transitions by exploring how governance structures co-evolve with different transition pathways. Using the case of China’s green energy transitions, we compare two distinct governance structures that have emerged in two Chinese provinces. The analysis challenges the dominant narrative that China’s transitions are exclusively state-led, demonstrating that divergent governance structures can emerge at the subnational level. Specifically, we identify two models: one that adheres to a centralised power system, referred to as the developmental state model; the other departs from the existing model by building more distributed energy systems driven by a wide range of actors, referred to as ‘distributed governance structures’. While it remains uncertain whether these two models will complement or compete each other in the future, they represent two divergent transition pathways that could shape China’s future low-carbon development.
国家角色的转变:中国低碳能源转型的两种治理模式
本文通过探讨治理结构如何与不同的转型路径共同演变,考察了国家在可持续性转型中的角色变化。以中国的绿色能源转型为例,我们比较了中国两个省份出现的两种截然不同的治理结构。该分析挑战了中国转型完全由国家主导的主流说法,表明不同的治理结构可以在地方层面出现。具体来说,我们确定了两种模式:一种是坚持中央集权的电力系统,被称为发展型国家模式;另一种是通过构建由广泛的参与者驱动的更多分布式能源系统来脱离现有的模型,称为“分布式治理结构”。虽然这两种模式在未来是互补还是竞争还不确定,但它们代表了两种不同的转型路径,可能会影响中国未来的低碳发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信