{"title":"Comparative analysis of deep learning models for early detection of osteoarthritis using knee radiographs: A retrospective study","authors":"Ajay Sharma , Jujhar Singh , Appan Kumar , Vedant Bajaj , Shubham Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease leading to pain and disability worldwide. Early detection is critical to initiating treatment strategies that can delay disease progression. While deep learning models have shown promise in automating Osteoarthritis detection from radiographs, comparative studies assessing their efficacy for early-stage detection remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning architectures for early detection of knee osteoarthritis using radiographic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study analysing 1200 knee radiographs (1000 training, 200 validation) collected from 2022 to 2024. Three deep learning models (custom CNN, ResNet-50, and VGG-16) were implemented and trained using PyTorch. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC metrics. Ground truth was established through independent assessment by three experienced orthopaedic surgeons using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-50 demonstrated superior performance with accuracy 0.912 ± 0.018, sensitivity 0.908 ± 0.021, specificity 0.916 ± 0.017, and AUC 0.934 ± 0.013. VGG-16 followed with accuracy 0.887 ± 0.020, while the custom CNN achieved 0.853 ± 0.025. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between models (p < 0.01). Inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.83 ± 0.02) indicated strong concordance between AI predictions and expert assessments. Model performance remained consistent across demographic subgroups, with only minimal variations based on age and BMI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ResNet-50 architecture demonstrated optimal performance for early osteoarthritis detection, combining high accuracy with clinically viable processing speeds. The model's consistency across demographic subgroups and strong inter-observer agreement suggests potential for reliable clinical implementation in automated screening workflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 103212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225003108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease leading to pain and disability worldwide. Early detection is critical to initiating treatment strategies that can delay disease progression. While deep learning models have shown promise in automating Osteoarthritis detection from radiographs, comparative studies assessing their efficacy for early-stage detection remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning architectures for early detection of knee osteoarthritis using radiographic imaging.
Materials and methods
A retrospective study analysing 1200 knee radiographs (1000 training, 200 validation) collected from 2022 to 2024. Three deep learning models (custom CNN, ResNet-50, and VGG-16) were implemented and trained using PyTorch. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC metrics. Ground truth was established through independent assessment by three experienced orthopaedic surgeons using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system.
Results
ResNet-50 demonstrated superior performance with accuracy 0.912 ± 0.018, sensitivity 0.908 ± 0.021, specificity 0.916 ± 0.017, and AUC 0.934 ± 0.013. VGG-16 followed with accuracy 0.887 ± 0.020, while the custom CNN achieved 0.853 ± 0.025. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between models (p < 0.01). Inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.83 ± 0.02) indicated strong concordance between AI predictions and expert assessments. Model performance remained consistent across demographic subgroups, with only minimal variations based on age and BMI.
Conclusion
ResNet-50 architecture demonstrated optimal performance for early osteoarthritis detection, combining high accuracy with clinically viable processing speeds. The model's consistency across demographic subgroups and strong inter-observer agreement suggests potential for reliable clinical implementation in automated screening workflows.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.