Validating a creative teaching inventory: A mixed method approach to construct validity

Q2 Psychology
Todd Kettler, Beatrice Ruiz Buentello, Nilay Ayse Gunel, Madelyn Chance, Laila Y. Sanguras
{"title":"Validating a creative teaching inventory: A mixed method approach to construct validity","authors":"Todd Kettler,&nbsp;Beatrice Ruiz Buentello,&nbsp;Nilay Ayse Gunel,&nbsp;Madelyn Chance,&nbsp;Laila Y. Sanguras","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Creative pedagogies are increasingly important as the demand for a creative workforce grows. However, there are limited measures of creative pedagogy. One such measure is <em>The Inventory of Teaching Practices in Higher Education</em>. Only one study has been published examining its factor structure when used with undergraduate students. The present study aims to further investigate its construct validity using a convergent mixed methods design. We recruited students (<em>n</em> = 268) from a private university in Texas and administered a modified version of the inventory, with items from each factor presented together followed by two open ended items asking for them to first define and then give an example of each factor. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the original four factor structure (CFI = 0.991; TLI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.055; SRMR = 0.070). Thematic analysis of the open-ended responses revealed low alignment for factor one and four between participants conceptualization of the factor and the original factor conceptualization. Our conceptualization, based on participants’ perceptions, offers a broader definition of the factors applying the concept of pedagogical convergence. There was moderate to strong alignment between our conceptualization and the original conceptualization of factors two and three. Integration of the quantitative and qualitative findings reveal evidence for the inclusion of each item on its respective factor as each item was represented by at least one subtheme from the thematic analysis. This study demonstrates that mixed methods designs can strengthen structural and construct validation studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative pedagogies are increasingly important as the demand for a creative workforce grows. However, there are limited measures of creative pedagogy. One such measure is The Inventory of Teaching Practices in Higher Education. Only one study has been published examining its factor structure when used with undergraduate students. The present study aims to further investigate its construct validity using a convergent mixed methods design. We recruited students (n = 268) from a private university in Texas and administered a modified version of the inventory, with items from each factor presented together followed by two open ended items asking for them to first define and then give an example of each factor. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the original four factor structure (CFI = 0.991; TLI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.055; SRMR = 0.070). Thematic analysis of the open-ended responses revealed low alignment for factor one and four between participants conceptualization of the factor and the original factor conceptualization. Our conceptualization, based on participants’ perceptions, offers a broader definition of the factors applying the concept of pedagogical convergence. There was moderate to strong alignment between our conceptualization and the original conceptualization of factors two and three. Integration of the quantitative and qualitative findings reveal evidence for the inclusion of each item on its respective factor as each item was represented by at least one subtheme from the thematic analysis. This study demonstrates that mixed methods designs can strengthen structural and construct validation studies.
创造性教学量表的验证:一种构建效度的混合方法
随着对创造性劳动力需求的增长,创造性教学法变得越来越重要。然而,创造性教学法的措施有限。其中一项措施是高等教育教学实践清单。只有一项研究对其在本科生中使用的因素结构进行了研究。本研究旨在采用收敛混合方法设计进一步考察其结构效度。我们从德克萨斯州的一所私立大学招募了268名学生,并对他们进行了修改后的问卷调查,将每个因素中的项目放在一起,然后是两个开放式的项目,要求他们首先定义每个因素,然后给出每个因素的例子。验证性因子分析支持原来的四因子结构(CFI = 0.991; TLI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.055; SRMR = 0.070)。对开放式回答的专题分析显示,参与者对因素概念化与原始因素概念化之间的因素1和因素4的一致性较低。我们的概念,基于参与者的看法,提供了应用教学趋同概念的因素的更广泛的定义。在我们的概念化和因素二和因素三的原始概念化之间有中等到强烈的一致性。将数量和质量调查结果综合起来,就有证据表明每个项目都按其各自的因素列入,因为每个项目至少由专题分析中的一个分主题代表。该研究表明,混合方法设计可以加强结构和结构验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信