Development and preliminary testing of a scenario-based instrument to measure nutrition literacy of pregnant women

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Tzu-Ling Chen , Li-Ling Liao , Mi-Hsiu Wei , Yueh-Yin Fang , Chia-Hsun Wu
{"title":"Development and preliminary testing of a scenario-based instrument to measure nutrition literacy of pregnant women","authors":"Tzu-Ling Chen ,&nbsp;Li-Ling Liao ,&nbsp;Mi-Hsiu Wei ,&nbsp;Yueh-Yin Fang ,&nbsp;Chia-Hsun Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nutrition literacy (NL) during pregnancy is important for both mothers and infants. The present study aimed to develop a scenario-based instrument to measure the NL abilities of pregnant women and test the validity and reliability of this instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The development of the instrument comprised six phases: (1) identification of key domains through literature review; (2) a Delphi survey; (3) development of a scenario-based test; (4) evaluation of content validity; (5) pilot test; and (6) assessment of the instrument’s psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A convenience sample of 489 pregnant Taiwanese women was used to assess NL via a 22-item scenario-based scale across four domains: “understand”, “analyse”, “appraise”, and “apply”. Item Response Theory analysis showed that most items provided the greatest precision for respondents with low to moderate ability levels (θ = −3 to 0). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a second-order, four-factor model. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = 0.78), and item-total correlations ranged from 0.31 to 0.53 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), indicating strong reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The validated Nutrition Literacy Scale is psychometrically sound and suitable for research, clinical use, and future interventions to improve NL and dietary behaviours during pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 104613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825003304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nutrition literacy (NL) during pregnancy is important for both mothers and infants. The present study aimed to develop a scenario-based instrument to measure the NL abilities of pregnant women and test the validity and reliability of this instrument.

Methods

The development of the instrument comprised six phases: (1) identification of key domains through literature review; (2) a Delphi survey; (3) development of a scenario-based test; (4) evaluation of content validity; (5) pilot test; and (6) assessment of the instrument’s psychometric properties.

Results

A convenience sample of 489 pregnant Taiwanese women was used to assess NL via a 22-item scenario-based scale across four domains: “understand”, “analyse”, “appraise”, and “apply”. Item Response Theory analysis showed that most items provided the greatest precision for respondents with low to moderate ability levels (θ = −3 to 0). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a second-order, four-factor model. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = 0.78), and item-total correlations ranged from 0.31 to 0.53 (p < 0.001), indicating strong reliability.

Conclusion

The validated Nutrition Literacy Scale is psychometrically sound and suitable for research, clinical use, and future interventions to improve NL and dietary behaviours during pregnancy.
开发和初步测试基于场景的工具,以衡量孕妇的营养素养
怀孕期间的营养素养(NL)对母亲和婴儿都很重要。本研究旨在开发一种基于情境的测量孕妇NL能力的工具,并对该工具的效度和信度进行检验。方法该仪器的开发分为六个阶段:(1)通过文献综述确定关键域;(2)德尔菲调查;(3)开发基于场景的测试;(4)内容效度评价;(5)先导试验;(6)评估仪器的心理测量特性。结果本研究采用基于情境的22项量表,在“理解”、“分析”、“评价”和“应用”四个领域对489名台湾孕妇进行了NL评估。项目反应理论分析表明,大多数项目对低至中等能力水平(θ =−3 ~ 0)的被调查者提供了最大的精度。验证性因子分析支持二阶四因子模型。内部一致性是可以接受的(Cronbach 's α = 0.78),项目-总相关性在0.31至0.53之间(p < 0.001),表明具有很强的信度。结论经验证的营养素养量表在心理测量学上是合理的,适合于研究、临床使用和未来的干预措施,以改善怀孕期间的营养素养和饮食行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信