Long-term Survival Analysis From PERLA, A Phase II Randomized Trial of Dostarlimab With Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab With Chemotherapy in Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC

IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sun Min Lim MD, PhD , Ana Laura Ortega Granados MD , Gustavo dix Junqueira Pinto MD, MSc , Christian Sebastián Fuentes MD , Giuseppe Lo Russo MD , Michael Schenker MD , Jin Seok Ahn MD, PhD , Filippo de Marinis MD , Kenneth Locke Jr. PhD , Zsolt Szijgyarto PhD , Elena Buss MSc , Neda Stjepanovic MD, PhD , Ivan Diaz-Padilla MD, PhD , Solange Peters MD, PhD
{"title":"Long-term Survival Analysis From PERLA, A Phase II Randomized Trial of Dostarlimab With Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab With Chemotherapy in Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC","authors":"Sun Min Lim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ana Laura Ortega Granados MD ,&nbsp;Gustavo dix Junqueira Pinto MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Christian Sebastián Fuentes MD ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Lo Russo MD ,&nbsp;Michael Schenker MD ,&nbsp;Jin Seok Ahn MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Filippo de Marinis MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth Locke Jr. PhD ,&nbsp;Zsolt Szijgyarto PhD ,&nbsp;Elena Buss MSc ,&nbsp;Neda Stjepanovic MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ivan Diaz-Padilla MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Solange Peters MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>PERLA is a global, double-blind, phase II trial comparing anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies, dostarlimab, and pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (D+CT and P+CT, respectively) in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without actionable genomic aberrations in the first-line setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive not more than 35 cycles of 500 mg dostarlimab or 200 mg pembrolizumab, with less than or equal to 35 cycles of 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> pemetrexed and less than or equal to 4 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) or carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/mL/min) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the overall response rate by blinded independent central review. The secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) on the basis of investigator assessment, overall survival (OS), and safety. Here, we reported on the long-term OS, PFS, and safety analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the end of the study (September 10, 2024), the median follow-up time (mo) for PFS was 30.4 for D+CT and 30.4 for P+CT. The median PFS (mo [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was 8.8 (6.9–11.0) for D+CT and 6.8 (4.9–7.1) for P+CT (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI: 0.58–1.03] at 79% maturity). The median follow-up time (mo) for OS was 35.5 for D+CT and 35.2 for P+CT. The median OS (mo [95% CI]) was 20.2 (14.5–27.3) and 15.9 (11.6–19.3), respectively (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI: 0.55–1.02] at 70% maturity). Safety profiles were similar between arms and consistent with previous analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This long-term analysis reaffirms previous observations that D+CT exhibited similar efficacy to P+CT and exhibits strong clinical efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT04581824.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 10","pages":"Article 100900"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364325001183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

PERLA is a global, double-blind, phase II trial comparing anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies, dostarlimab, and pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (D+CT and P+CT, respectively) in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without actionable genomic aberrations in the first-line setting.

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive not more than 35 cycles of 500 mg dostarlimab or 200 mg pembrolizumab, with less than or equal to 35 cycles of 500 mg/m2 pemetrexed and less than or equal to 4 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m2) or carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/mL/min) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the overall response rate by blinded independent central review. The secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) on the basis of investigator assessment, overall survival (OS), and safety. Here, we reported on the long-term OS, PFS, and safety analyses.

Results

At the end of the study (September 10, 2024), the median follow-up time (mo) for PFS was 30.4 for D+CT and 30.4 for P+CT. The median PFS (mo [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was 8.8 (6.9–11.0) for D+CT and 6.8 (4.9–7.1) for P+CT (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI: 0.58–1.03] at 79% maturity). The median follow-up time (mo) for OS was 35.5 for D+CT and 35.2 for P+CT. The median OS (mo [95% CI]) was 20.2 (14.5–27.3) and 15.9 (11.6–19.3), respectively (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI: 0.55–1.02] at 70% maturity). Safety profiles were similar between arms and consistent with previous analyses.

Conclusions

This long-term analysis reaffirms previous observations that D+CT exhibited similar efficacy to P+CT and exhibits strong clinical efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC.

Clinical trial registration

NCT04581824.
来自PERLA的长期生存分析,一项多斯塔利单抗联合化疗与派姆单抗联合化疗治疗转移性非鳞状NSCLC的II期随机试验
perla是一项全球性、双盲、II期试验,比较抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抗体、多斯塔利单抗和派姆单抗联合化疗(分别为D+CT和P+CT)在一线环境中无可操作基因组异常的转移性非鳞状NSCLC患者中的疗效。方法患者按1:1随机分组,接受不超过35个周期的500 mg的多司来单抗或200 mg的派姆单抗,培美曲塞≤35个周期的500 mg/m2,顺铂≤4个周期(75 mg/m2)或卡铂(曲线下面积5mg /mL/min)每3周。主要终点是盲法独立中心评价的总缓解率。次要终点包括基于研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。在这里,我们报告了长期的OS、PFS和安全性分析。结果研究结束时(2024年9月10日),PFS的中位随访时间(mo) D+CT为30.4,P+CT为30.4。D+CT的中位PFS (mo[95%可信区间(CI)]为8.8 (6.9-11.0),P+CT的中位PFS为6.8(4.9-7.1)(79%成熟度时风险比0.77 [95% CI: 0.58-1.03])。D+CT组OS的中位随访时间为35.5,P+CT组为35.2。中位OS (mo [95% CI])分别为20.2(14.5-27.3)和15.9(11.6-19.3)(70%成熟度时风险比为0.75 [95% CI: 0.55-1.02])。两组的安全性相似,与之前的分析一致。这项长期分析证实了先前的观察结果,即D+CT与P+CT具有相似的疗效,并且作为转移性非鳞状NSCLC患者的一线治疗具有很强的临床疗效。临床试验注册号:nct04581824。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信