REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID AND FIBRATES IN URUGUAYAN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Noel Boldrini Arce , Yamila Montaño , Patricia Etchandy , Daniela Chiodi , Adriana Sánchez , Nelia Hernández
{"title":"REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID AND FIBRATES IN URUGUAYAN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS","authors":"Noel Boldrini Arce ,&nbsp;Yamila Montaño ,&nbsp;Patricia Etchandy ,&nbsp;Daniela Chiodi ,&nbsp;Adriana Sánchez ,&nbsp;Nelia Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><div>A considerable proportion of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) fail to achieve an adequate biochemical response to standard therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which is associated with a poorer prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the biochemical efficacy and tolerability of combining fibrates with UDCA in a cohort of Uruguayan patients with PBC.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective and descriptive cohort study was conducted. Adult patients with PBC who had persistently elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels after one year of UDCA treatment (13–15 mg/kg/day) and were subsequently treated with bezafibrate, fenofibrate, or ciprofibrate between 2018 and 2025 were included. Liver function tests were assessed at one and three months. The primary outcome was the ALP value at three months. Complete response was defined as normalization (ALP ≤ 1 × upper limit of normal [ULN]) and partial response as a reduction from baseline without normalization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty patients (17 women, mean age 51.4 years) met inclusion criteria (see Table). Eleven patients received fenofibrate (160–200 mg/day), seven bezafibrate (200–400 mg/day), and two ciprofibrate (100 mg/day). Three patients discontinued fibrates before three months due to hepatotoxicity (ALTx5 ULN). Among the remaining 17 patients, eight achieved complete response, six showed partial improvement (24–76% improvement from baseline), and three had no biochemical change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>UDCA-fibrate combination therapy was associated with biochemical improvement in the majority of patients. However, the notable rate of hepatotoxicity warrants caution. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 102000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S166526812500225X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

A considerable proportion of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) fail to achieve an adequate biochemical response to standard therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which is associated with a poorer prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the biochemical efficacy and tolerability of combining fibrates with UDCA in a cohort of Uruguayan patients with PBC.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective and descriptive cohort study was conducted. Adult patients with PBC who had persistently elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels after one year of UDCA treatment (13–15 mg/kg/day) and were subsequently treated with bezafibrate, fenofibrate, or ciprofibrate between 2018 and 2025 were included. Liver function tests were assessed at one and three months. The primary outcome was the ALP value at three months. Complete response was defined as normalization (ALP ≤ 1 × upper limit of normal [ULN]) and partial response as a reduction from baseline without normalization.

Results

Twenty patients (17 women, mean age 51.4 years) met inclusion criteria (see Table). Eleven patients received fenofibrate (160–200 mg/day), seven bezafibrate (200–400 mg/day), and two ciprofibrate (100 mg/day). Three patients discontinued fibrates before three months due to hepatotoxicity (ALTx5 ULN). Among the remaining 17 patients, eight achieved complete response, six showed partial improvement (24–76% improvement from baseline), and three had no biochemical change.

Conclusions

UDCA-fibrate combination therapy was associated with biochemical improvement in the majority of patients. However, the notable rate of hepatotoxicity warrants caution. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to validate these findings.
熊去氧胆酸和贝特酸酯治疗乌拉圭原发性胆管炎患者的实际疗效
相当比例的原发性胆管炎(PBC)患者对熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)标准治疗未能达到足够的生化反应,这与较差的预后相关。本研究旨在评估乌拉圭PBC患者贝特类药物联合UDCA的生化疗效和耐受性。材料与方法采用回顾性、描述性队列研究。纳入了在UDCA治疗一年后(13-15 mg/kg/天)碱性磷酸酶(ALP)水平持续升高并随后在2018年至2025年期间接受贝扎贝特、非诺贝特或环丙贝特治疗的成年PBC患者。在1个月和3个月时进行肝功能检查。主要终点是三个月时的ALP值。完全缓解定义为归一化(ALP≤1 × 正常[ULN]上限),部分缓解定义为未经归一化而较基线减少。结果20例患者(女性17例,平均年龄51.4岁)符合纳入标准(见表)。11例患者接受非诺贝特(160-200 mg/天),7例贝扎贝特(200-400 mg/天)和2例环丙贝特(100 mg/天)治疗。3例患者因肝毒性(ALTx5 ULN)在3个月前停用贝特类药物。其余17例患者中,8例完全缓解,6例部分改善(较基线改善24-76%),3例无生化变化。结论sudca -fibrate联合治疗大多数患者的生化指标均有改善。然而,肝毒性的显著率值得谨慎。需要更大规模的随访研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信