ASSESSMENT OF FIBROSIS AND STEATOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC ASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE USING TWO TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Marlyn Zamora Posada , David Castellanos Alfonso , Martin Garzon Olarte , Mario Rey Tovar
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF FIBROSIS AND STEATOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC ASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE USING TWO TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES","authors":"Marlyn Zamora Posada ,&nbsp;David Castellanos Alfonso ,&nbsp;Martin Garzon Olarte ,&nbsp;Mario Rey Tovar","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><div>Metabolic associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Accurate non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis is critical for cirrhosis progression risk stratification and clinical decision-making. While FibroScan® is a well-validated transient elastography technique, Hepatus® has emerged as a comparable technological alternative. There are few studies directly comparing the two modalities. This study aimed to compare the performance of FibroScan® and Hepatus® in evaluating hepatic fibrosis and fat deposition degree in patients with hepatic steatosis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A prospective, blinded validation study was conducted in 122 adult patients with hepatic steatosis diagnosis. Liver stiffness (kPa) and steatosis (dB/m) were assessed on the same day using both devices by independent expert operators, ensuring optimal examination quality (IQR/M &lt;0.3). Correlation, agreement and differences were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests and post-hoc analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For liver fibrosis, both devices showed strong correlation (r=0.85, p&lt;0.05) and substantial agreement (Kappa=0.77), with greater concordance in advanced stages and no significant differences in mean values. Regarding hepatic steatosis, although Hepatus® reported higher absolute values (p&lt;0.05), it showed an almost perfect positive linear correlation with FibroScan® (r≈1). Agreement for steatosis staging was moderate (Kappa=0.39), with discrepancies mainly observed in extreme categories (S0 vs S3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FibroScan® and Hepatus® show high concordance and strong correlation in assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis quantification. Hepatus® may serve as a viable clinical alternative for non-invasive evaluation of MASLD in diverse healthcare settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 102009"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268125002340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

Metabolic associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Accurate non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis is critical for cirrhosis progression risk stratification and clinical decision-making. While FibroScan® is a well-validated transient elastography technique, Hepatus® has emerged as a comparable technological alternative. There are few studies directly comparing the two modalities. This study aimed to compare the performance of FibroScan® and Hepatus® in evaluating hepatic fibrosis and fat deposition degree in patients with hepatic steatosis.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, blinded validation study was conducted in 122 adult patients with hepatic steatosis diagnosis. Liver stiffness (kPa) and steatosis (dB/m) were assessed on the same day using both devices by independent expert operators, ensuring optimal examination quality (IQR/M <0.3). Correlation, agreement and differences were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests and post-hoc analysis.

Results

For liver fibrosis, both devices showed strong correlation (r=0.85, p<0.05) and substantial agreement (Kappa=0.77), with greater concordance in advanced stages and no significant differences in mean values. Regarding hepatic steatosis, although Hepatus® reported higher absolute values (p<0.05), it showed an almost perfect positive linear correlation with FibroScan® (r≈1). Agreement for steatosis staging was moderate (Kappa=0.39), with discrepancies mainly observed in extreme categories (S0 vs S3).

Conclusions

FibroScan® and Hepatus® show high concordance and strong correlation in assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis quantification. Hepatus® may serve as a viable clinical alternative for non-invasive evaluation of MASLD in diverse healthcare settings.
使用两种瞬时弹性成像技术评估代谢性脂肪变性肝病患者的纤维化和脂肪变性
代谢相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)是世界范围内慢性肝病的主要病因之一。准确的无创评估肝纤维化和脂肪变性对肝硬化进展风险分层和临床决策至关重要。虽然FibroScan®是一种经过验证的瞬变弹性成像技术,但Hepatus®已经成为一种类似的技术替代品。很少有研究直接比较这两种模式。本研究旨在比较FibroScan®和Hepatus®在评估肝脂肪变性患者肝纤维化和脂肪沉积程度方面的性能。材料与方法对122例确诊为肝脂肪变性的成人患者进行了前瞻性、盲法验证研究。肝脏硬度(kPa)和脂肪变性(dB/m)由独立的专家操作人员在同一天使用这两种设备进行评估,以确保最佳的检查质量(IQR/ m <0.3)。使用适当的统计检验和事后分析分析相关性、一致性和差异性。结果对于肝纤维化,两种器械具有强相关性(r=0.85, p<0.05)和一致性(Kappa=0.77),晚期一致性更强,平均值无显著差异。对于肝脂肪变性,虽然Hepatus®报告的绝对值更高(p<0.05),但它与FibroScan®显示出几乎完全的线性正相关(r≈1)。脂肪变性分期的一致性为中等(Kappa=0.39),差异主要见于极端类别(S0 vs S3)。结论fibroscan®和Hepatus®在肝纤维化和脂肪变性定量评估中具有高度一致性和强相关性。在不同的医疗环境中,Hepatus®可作为一种可行的非侵入性评估MASLD的临床替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信