LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: IMPLICATIONS OF EXPANDING AGE LIMITS IN LOW-DONATION SETTINGS IN LATIN AMERICA

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Maria Fernanda Lynch-Mejía , Francisco Vargas-Navarro , Wagner Ramírez-Quesada , Maria José Soto-Echeverri , Andrés Solera-Vega , Alejandra Ochoa-Palominos , Pablo Coste
{"title":"LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: IMPLICATIONS OF EXPANDING AGE LIMITS IN LOW-DONATION SETTINGS IN LATIN AMERICA","authors":"Maria Fernanda Lynch-Mejía ,&nbsp;Francisco Vargas-Navarro ,&nbsp;Wagner Ramírez-Quesada ,&nbsp;Maria José Soto-Echeverri ,&nbsp;Andrés Solera-Vega ,&nbsp;Alejandra Ochoa-Palominos ,&nbsp;Pablo Coste","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><div>In Costa Rica, liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is legally restricted to patients under 65 years. This limits curative options and may favor patients receiving exception MELD points. The country’s average liver donation rate remains low, at 5.4 donors per million population per year, further limiting access.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We assessed transplant eligibility, bridging therapies, and outcomes in HCC patients at a tertiary center. Eligibility was defined as age &lt;65, meeting UCSF criteria, and having no contraindications. We modeled the impact of raising the age limit to &lt;70 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 260 patients, 52 (20%) met transplant criteria; 86.5% received bridging therapy (TACE 27, ablation 18, resection 2). One additional patient was downstaged to eligibility. Among 53 total candidates, 30.2% progressed or died before listing, 11.3% remained stable on alternative treatments, 45% were transplanted, and 9.4% died or dropped out while on the waitlist. Mean wait time was 148.1 days (SD 93.5). Expanding the age limit to &lt;70 years would increase eligibility by 49%, adding 27 candidates. However, this may disadvantage other patients with high functional MELD scores, as those with HCC receive exception points after three months of evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Raising the age threshold for LT would expand access for older HCC patients but may exacerbate inequities in organ allocation due to low donation rates and MELD exception prioritization. Policy reform must be accompanied by increased organ procurement efforts and ethical safeguards to ensure equitable access in low-donation settings such as Costa Rica.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 102028"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268125002534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

In Costa Rica, liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is legally restricted to patients under 65 years. This limits curative options and may favor patients receiving exception MELD points. The country’s average liver donation rate remains low, at 5.4 donors per million population per year, further limiting access.

Materials and Methods

We assessed transplant eligibility, bridging therapies, and outcomes in HCC patients at a tertiary center. Eligibility was defined as age <65, meeting UCSF criteria, and having no contraindications. We modeled the impact of raising the age limit to <70 years.

Results

Of 260 patients, 52 (20%) met transplant criteria; 86.5% received bridging therapy (TACE 27, ablation 18, resection 2). One additional patient was downstaged to eligibility. Among 53 total candidates, 30.2% progressed or died before listing, 11.3% remained stable on alternative treatments, 45% were transplanted, and 9.4% died or dropped out while on the waitlist. Mean wait time was 148.1 days (SD 93.5). Expanding the age limit to <70 years would increase eligibility by 49%, adding 27 candidates. However, this may disadvantage other patients with high functional MELD scores, as those with HCC receive exception points after three months of evaluation.

Conclusions

Raising the age threshold for LT would expand access for older HCC patients but may exacerbate inequities in organ allocation due to low donation rates and MELD exception prioritization. Policy reform must be accompanied by increased organ procurement efforts and ethical safeguards to ensure equitable access in low-donation settings such as Costa Rica.
肝细胞癌肝移植:在拉丁美洲低捐献环境中扩大年龄限制的意义
在哥斯达黎加,肝细胞癌(HCC)的肝移植(LT)在法律上仅限于65岁以下的患者。这限制了治疗选择,可能有利于接受例外MELD点的患者。该国的平均肝脏捐献率仍然很低,每年每百万人中只有5.4人捐献肝脏,这进一步限制了获取肝脏的机会。材料和方法我们评估了三级中心HCC患者的移植资格、桥接治疗和预后。资格定义为年龄65岁,符合UCSF标准,无禁忌症。我们模拟了将年龄限制提高到70岁的影响。结果260例患者中,52例(20%)符合移植标准;86.5%接受了桥接治疗(TACE 27,消融18,切除2)。另外一名患者被降级为合格。在53名候选人中,30.2%的人在上市前进展或死亡,11.3%的人在替代治疗中保持稳定,45%的人移植,9.4%的人在等待名单中死亡或退出。平均等待时间为148.1天(SD 93.5)。将年龄限制扩大到70岁将使资格增加49%,增加27名候选人。然而,这可能会使其他具有高功能MELD评分的患者处于不利地位,因为HCC患者在三个月评估后获得例外分。提高肝移植的年龄门槛将扩大老年HCC患者获得肝移植的机会,但由于低捐献率和MELD例外优先级,可能加剧器官分配的不公平。政策改革必须伴随着加强器官采购工作和道德保障,以确保在哥斯达黎加等低捐赠环境中公平获得器官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信