Norman Rose, Islam Agrama, Irit Nachtigall, Mathias W. Pletz, Jenny Rosendahl, Ha-Yeun Chung, Christina E. Zielinski, Diana Dudziak, Melissa Spoden, Patrik Dröge, Stefan Hagel, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek
{"title":"Sex differences in sepsis outcomes across the lifespan: a population-based cohort study in Germany","authors":"Norman Rose, Islam Agrama, Irit Nachtigall, Mathias W. Pletz, Jenny Rosendahl, Ha-Yeun Chung, Christina E. Zielinski, Diana Dudziak, Melissa Spoden, Patrik Dröge, Stefan Hagel, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05657-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis is a major global health concern influenced by both biological sex and socially constructed gender roles, which can affect disease susceptibility, progression, treatment and outcomes. Evidence on sex-specific differences in sepsis often lacks age-specific analysis, despite known interactions between sex, age, and immune function. We aimed to investigate age-dependent associations between sex and mortality as well as long-term outcomes among sepsis survivors after hospitalization. This retrospective, population-based cohort study based on nationwide health claims data from 2009 to 2017 of 23.0 million beneficiaries of a large German health insurance provider. Patients aged 15 years and older with incident hospital-treated sepsis identified by ICD-10-GM codes in 2013 to 2014 were included. Female and male sex. Differences in 12-months mortality, medical, psychological and cognitive diagnoses, as well as dependency on nursing care by sex and age were analyzed using generalized additive models including sex*age interaction effects. We report average marginal effects (AME) for sex and age as estimates of the adjusted marginal increase or decrease of the event rate of outcomes. We included 159,684 sepsis patients in 2013/2014, of which 75,809 (47.5%) were female and 83,875 (52.5%) were male. The average marginal hospital and 12-months mortality over the observed age distribution was AME = − 2.8% (95% CI, − 3.2%, − 2.3%, P < .001) and AME = − 5.4% (95% CI, − 5.9%, − 4.9%, P < .001) lower in females, respectively. Significant female survival benefits were predominantly found beyond age 44 (hospital mortality) and age 47 (12-months mortality). Females were also less often affected by cognitive impairments, but more often experienced psychological and physical impairments as well as nursing care dependency with differential associations observable across the lifespan. Sepsis long-term outcomes appear to be influenced by a complex interaction between age and sex. While our study focuses on these factors, it is important to acknowledge that observed associations cannot be attributed to biological sex alone, as numerous additional factors - directly or indirectly related to sex- may also contribute. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating sex-specific considerations into sepsis care and post-acute support strategies to improve long-term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"21 1","pages":"408"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05657-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sepsis is a major global health concern influenced by both biological sex and socially constructed gender roles, which can affect disease susceptibility, progression, treatment and outcomes. Evidence on sex-specific differences in sepsis often lacks age-specific analysis, despite known interactions between sex, age, and immune function. We aimed to investigate age-dependent associations between sex and mortality as well as long-term outcomes among sepsis survivors after hospitalization. This retrospective, population-based cohort study based on nationwide health claims data from 2009 to 2017 of 23.0 million beneficiaries of a large German health insurance provider. Patients aged 15 years and older with incident hospital-treated sepsis identified by ICD-10-GM codes in 2013 to 2014 were included. Female and male sex. Differences in 12-months mortality, medical, psychological and cognitive diagnoses, as well as dependency on nursing care by sex and age were analyzed using generalized additive models including sex*age interaction effects. We report average marginal effects (AME) for sex and age as estimates of the adjusted marginal increase or decrease of the event rate of outcomes. We included 159,684 sepsis patients in 2013/2014, of which 75,809 (47.5%) were female and 83,875 (52.5%) were male. The average marginal hospital and 12-months mortality over the observed age distribution was AME = − 2.8% (95% CI, − 3.2%, − 2.3%, P < .001) and AME = − 5.4% (95% CI, − 5.9%, − 4.9%, P < .001) lower in females, respectively. Significant female survival benefits were predominantly found beyond age 44 (hospital mortality) and age 47 (12-months mortality). Females were also less often affected by cognitive impairments, but more often experienced psychological and physical impairments as well as nursing care dependency with differential associations observable across the lifespan. Sepsis long-term outcomes appear to be influenced by a complex interaction between age and sex. While our study focuses on these factors, it is important to acknowledge that observed associations cannot be attributed to biological sex alone, as numerous additional factors - directly or indirectly related to sex- may also contribute. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating sex-specific considerations into sepsis care and post-acute support strategies to improve long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.