Brian Tilston Smith,Agusto Luzuriaga-Neira,David Alvarez-Ponce,Kaiya L Provost,Gregory Thom,Leo Joseph
{"title":"Introgressed variants obscure phylogenetic relationships but are not subject to positive selection in Australasian long-tailed parrots.","authors":"Brian Tilston Smith,Agusto Luzuriaga-Neira,David Alvarez-Ponce,Kaiya L Provost,Gregory Thom,Leo Joseph","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gene flow often obscures phylogenetic relationships but the evolutionary significance of introgressed variants is unclear. Here we examine the Australasian long-tailed parrots (Psittaculinae: Polytelini) in which an unexpected sister relationship between Polytelis alexandrae and the genus Aprosmictus, and not the other Polytelis species, has been observed. We tested whether this relationship was due to ancient introgression in whole genomes. We found that the majority of gene trees had Ap. erythropterus and P. alexandrae as sister taxa, whereas network analysis indicated monophyly of Polytelis, 48% of gene trees being in phylogenetic conflict due to introgression from Ap. erythropterus into P. alexandrae. Further analyses confidently confirmed that 4-8% of the genome of P. alexandrae was introgressed from Ap. erythropterus with signals of gene flow occurring throughout the genome. These findings indicate that topologies with P. alexandrae and the genus Ap. erythropterus as sister taxa were biased by gene flow and affirm that Polytelis is monophyletic. Next, we assessed the evolutionary outcomes for introgressed variants and found that, among introgressed protein-coding genes, only two (0.8%) were under positive selection, in comparison to 99 (1.7%) of non-introgressed genes. Our results indicate that, despite the ubiquity of detectable introgression in phylogenies, many genetic variants flowing between species may play a minor role in molecular adaptations.","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gene flow often obscures phylogenetic relationships but the evolutionary significance of introgressed variants is unclear. Here we examine the Australasian long-tailed parrots (Psittaculinae: Polytelini) in which an unexpected sister relationship between Polytelis alexandrae and the genus Aprosmictus, and not the other Polytelis species, has been observed. We tested whether this relationship was due to ancient introgression in whole genomes. We found that the majority of gene trees had Ap. erythropterus and P. alexandrae as sister taxa, whereas network analysis indicated monophyly of Polytelis, 48% of gene trees being in phylogenetic conflict due to introgression from Ap. erythropterus into P. alexandrae. Further analyses confidently confirmed that 4-8% of the genome of P. alexandrae was introgressed from Ap. erythropterus with signals of gene flow occurring throughout the genome. These findings indicate that topologies with P. alexandrae and the genus Ap. erythropterus as sister taxa were biased by gene flow and affirm that Polytelis is monophyletic. Next, we assessed the evolutionary outcomes for introgressed variants and found that, among introgressed protein-coding genes, only two (0.8%) were under positive selection, in comparison to 99 (1.7%) of non-introgressed genes. Our results indicate that, despite the ubiquity of detectable introgression in phylogenies, many genetic variants flowing between species may play a minor role in molecular adaptations.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.