Assessing Hospital Surgical Functions in South Korea: A Functional Analysis Using the Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition Essential Surgery List (2013-2022).

IF 2.1
Haibin Bai, Jin-Hwan Kim, Yukyung Park
{"title":"Assessing Hospital Surgical Functions in South Korea: A Functional Analysis Using the Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition Essential Surgery List (2013-2022).","authors":"Haibin Bai, Jin-Hwan Kim, Yukyung Park","doi":"10.3961/jpmph.25.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>South Korea has achieved near-universal health coverage through a predominantly privatized healthcare system. However, this structural fragmentation has created significant ambiguity regarding the roles of different healthcare organizations, particularly in ensuring equitable provision of essential surgical services across geographic and institutional boundaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using the full national health insurance claims database provided by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (2013-2022). Essential surgical procedures from the Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition Essential Surgery List were mapped to insurance claims codes, and their provision was analyzed across healthcare facilities and regions. Functional capacity was defined using minimum annual volume thresholds of 12, 24, 60, and 120 procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Essential surgery more than doubled between 2013 and 2022, increasing from 2.79 million to nearly 6 million cases. Superior general hospitals and general hospitals consistently delivered high volumes of essential surgeries, while hospital-level facilities experienced marked functional decline, particularly in obstetric services. We observed increasing centralization of surgical services in higher-tier and metropolitan facilities, alongside selective decentralization for lower-risk procedures such as cataract surgery. Regional disparities were especially pronounced for obstetric care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Functional capacity for essential surgery remains highly uneven across hospitals and regions, undermining equitable access. Policy efforts should focus on strengthening lower-tier hospitals in underserved areas and implementing minimum functionality standards tailored to local needs. Clarifying institutional roles within South Korea's mixed healthcare system is essential to improving accountability and ensuring equitable distribution of essential surgical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":520687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.25.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: South Korea has achieved near-universal health coverage through a predominantly privatized healthcare system. However, this structural fragmentation has created significant ambiguity regarding the roles of different healthcare organizations, particularly in ensuring equitable provision of essential surgical services across geographic and institutional boundaries.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using the full national health insurance claims database provided by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (2013-2022). Essential surgical procedures from the Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition Essential Surgery List were mapped to insurance claims codes, and their provision was analyzed across healthcare facilities and regions. Functional capacity was defined using minimum annual volume thresholds of 12, 24, 60, and 120 procedures.

Results: Essential surgery more than doubled between 2013 and 2022, increasing from 2.79 million to nearly 6 million cases. Superior general hospitals and general hospitals consistently delivered high volumes of essential surgeries, while hospital-level facilities experienced marked functional decline, particularly in obstetric services. We observed increasing centralization of surgical services in higher-tier and metropolitan facilities, alongside selective decentralization for lower-risk procedures such as cataract surgery. Regional disparities were especially pronounced for obstetric care.

Conclusions: Functional capacity for essential surgery remains highly uneven across hospitals and regions, undermining equitable access. Policy efforts should focus on strengthening lower-tier hospitals in underserved areas and implementing minimum functionality standards tailored to local needs. Clarifying institutional roles within South Korea's mixed healthcare system is essential to improving accountability and ensuring equitable distribution of essential surgical services.

评估韩国医院外科功能:使用疾病控制重点的功能分析,第三版基本手术清单(2013-2022)。
目标:韩国通过主要的私有化医疗保健系统实现了近乎全民健康覆盖。然而,这种结构上的分散造成了不同医疗保健组织作用的严重模糊,特别是在确保跨地域和机构边界公平提供基本外科服务方面。方法:我们使用健康保险审查和评估服务(2013-2022)提供的完整的国家健康保险索赔数据库进行了回顾性研究。将《疾病控制重点,第三版基本手术清单》中的基本外科手术程序映射到保险索赔代码,并在医疗机构和地区分析其提供情况。功能容量使用最小年容量阈值12,24,60和120程序来定义。结果:从2013年到2022年,基本手术增加了一倍多,从279万例增加到近600万例。高级综合医院和综合医院一直提供大量的基本手术,而医院一级的设施功能明显下降,特别是产科服务。我们观察到,在高级别和大城市的医疗机构中,手术服务越来越集中,同时,白内障手术等低风险手术也有选择性地分散。产科护理方面的地区差异尤其明显。结论:各医院和地区基本手术的功能能力仍然极不平衡,破坏了公平获取。政策努力应侧重于加强服务不足地区的低级别医院,并根据当地需求实施最低功能标准。明确韩国混合医疗体系中的机构角色对于提高问责制和确保基本外科服务的公平分配至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信