Health programme spillover effects on childhood vaccination in India: a difference-in-differences analysis of the Zinc and Oral Rehydration Salts Programme using retrospective demographic health surveys data.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001743
Raf Van Gestel, Mujaheed Shaikh, Flore Vermijs, Carlos Riumallo-Herl
{"title":"Health programme spillover effects on childhood vaccination in India: a difference-in-differences analysis of the Zinc and Oral Rehydration Salts Programme using retrospective demographic health surveys data.","authors":"Raf Van Gestel, Mujaheed Shaikh, Flore Vermijs, Carlos Riumallo-Herl","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood immunisation coverage has stagnated globally and even declined in some countries during recent decades. We aimed to evaluate whether a public health programme targeted at diarrhoeal disease also impacted, as a spillover effect from the programme, immunisation coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the 2015/2016 Indian Demographic Health Survey were obtained on 142 921 children, born to mothers in the 5 years leading up to the survey. A difference-in-differences study was performed to compare the completed child vaccination rates before and after the Clinton Health Access Initiative Zinc (CHAI)/Oral Rehydration Salts Programme in 2012, and between covered (Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh) and non-covered states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CHAI programme was associated with an increase in basic child vaccination coverage (one dose of BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guérin) and measles, and three doses of DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and polio vaccines) of 5.27 percentage points (95% CI 3.48 to 7.05). This increase was concentrated among male children, and no differences were found by wealth quintiles, maternal education or sanitation. Different intensities of the CHAI initiative across districts in Uttar Pradesh were not associated with different vaccination coverage rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing studies rarely evaluate spillover effects or unintended consequences of public health campaigns. We find that a public health programme to reduce diarrhoeal diseases <i>was associated with increased</i> vaccination coverage in India. These findings highlight the potential horizontal health effects of disease-specific public campaigns and household behaviour responses to the programme. The evidence shows that actionable approaches to improve immunisation coverage exist that do not exclusively rely on vaccination campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e001743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childhood immunisation coverage has stagnated globally and even declined in some countries during recent decades. We aimed to evaluate whether a public health programme targeted at diarrhoeal disease also impacted, as a spillover effect from the programme, immunisation coverage.

Methods: Retrospective data from the 2015/2016 Indian Demographic Health Survey were obtained on 142 921 children, born to mothers in the 5 years leading up to the survey. A difference-in-differences study was performed to compare the completed child vaccination rates before and after the Clinton Health Access Initiative Zinc (CHAI)/Oral Rehydration Salts Programme in 2012, and between covered (Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh) and non-covered states.

Results: The CHAI programme was associated with an increase in basic child vaccination coverage (one dose of BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guérin) and measles, and three doses of DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and polio vaccines) of 5.27 percentage points (95% CI 3.48 to 7.05). This increase was concentrated among male children, and no differences were found by wealth quintiles, maternal education or sanitation. Different intensities of the CHAI initiative across districts in Uttar Pradesh were not associated with different vaccination coverage rates.

Conclusions: Existing studies rarely evaluate spillover effects or unintended consequences of public health campaigns. We find that a public health programme to reduce diarrhoeal diseases was associated with increased vaccination coverage in India. These findings highlight the potential horizontal health effects of disease-specific public campaigns and household behaviour responses to the programme. The evidence shows that actionable approaches to improve immunisation coverage exist that do not exclusively rely on vaccination campaigns.

保健方案对印度儿童疫苗接种的溢出效应:利用回顾性人口健康调查数据对锌和口服补液盐方案进行差异中差异分析。
背景:近几十年来,全球儿童免疫覆盖率停滞不前,在一些国家甚至有所下降。我们的目的是评估针对腹泻疾病的公共卫生规划是否也会影响免疫接种覆盖率,作为该规划的溢出效应。方法:从2015/2016年印度人口健康调查中获得142 921名儿童的回顾性数据,这些儿童的母亲在调查前5年内出生。进行了一项差异中的差异研究,以比较2012年克林顿健康获取倡议锌/口服补液盐方案前后完成的儿童疫苗接种率,以及覆盖(中央邦和北方邦)和未覆盖邦之间的接种率。结果:CHAI规划与儿童基本疫苗接种覆盖率(一剂卡介苗和麻疹疫苗,三剂百白破(白喉、破伤风和百日咳)和脊髓灰质炎疫苗)增加5.27个百分点(95% CI 3.48至7.05)相关。这一增长主要集中在男孩身上,在财富五分位数、母亲教育或卫生条件方面没有发现差异。北方邦各区CHAI计划的不同强度与不同的疫苗接种率无关。结论:现有研究很少评估公共卫生运动的溢出效应或意外后果。我们发现,一项旨在减少腹泻疾病的公共卫生计划与印度疫苗接种覆盖率的提高有关。这些发现突出了针对特定疾病的公共运动和家庭行为对该方案的反应可能产生的横向健康影响。证据表明,改善免疫接种覆盖率的可行方法并不完全依赖于疫苗接种运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信