Individualized machine-learning-based clinical assessment recommendation system.

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001022
Devin Setiawan, Yumiko Wiranto, Jeffrey M Girard, Amber Watts, Arian Ashourvan
{"title":"Individualized machine-learning-based clinical assessment recommendation system.","authors":"Devin Setiawan, Yumiko Wiranto, Jeffrey M Girard, Amber Watts, Arian Ashourvan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional clinical assessments often lack individualization, relying on standardized procedures that may not accommodate the diverse needs of patients, especially in early stages where personalized diagnosis could offer significant benefits. We aim to provide a machine-learning framework that addresses the individualized feature addition problem and enhances diagnostic accuracy for clinical assessments.Individualized Clinical Assessment Recommendation System (iCARE) employs locally weighted logistic regression and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) value analysis to tailor feature selection to individual patient characteristics. Evaluations were conducted on synthetic and real-world datasets, including early-stage diabetes risk prediction and heart failure clinical records from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. We compared the performance of iCARE with a Global approach using statistical analysis on accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC) to select the best additional features. The iCARE framework enhances predictive accuracy and AUC metrics when additional features exhibit distinct predictive capabilities, as evidenced by synthetic datasets 1-3 and the early diabetes dataset. Specifically, in synthetic dataset 1, iCARE achieved an accuracy of 0.999 and an AUC of 1.000, outperforming the Global approach with an accuracy of 0.689 and an AUC of 0.639. In the early diabetes and heart disease dataset, iCARE shows improvements of 6-12% in accuracy and AUC across different numbers of initial features over other feature selection methods. Conversely, in synthetic datasets 4-5 and the heart failure dataset, where features lack discernible predictive distinctions, iCARE shows no significant advantage over global approaches on accuracy and AUC metrics. iCARE provides personalized feature recommendations that enhance diagnostic accuracy in scenarios where individualized approaches are critical, improving the precision and effectiveness of medical diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 9","pages":"e0001022"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional clinical assessments often lack individualization, relying on standardized procedures that may not accommodate the diverse needs of patients, especially in early stages where personalized diagnosis could offer significant benefits. We aim to provide a machine-learning framework that addresses the individualized feature addition problem and enhances diagnostic accuracy for clinical assessments.Individualized Clinical Assessment Recommendation System (iCARE) employs locally weighted logistic regression and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) value analysis to tailor feature selection to individual patient characteristics. Evaluations were conducted on synthetic and real-world datasets, including early-stage diabetes risk prediction and heart failure clinical records from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. We compared the performance of iCARE with a Global approach using statistical analysis on accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC) to select the best additional features. The iCARE framework enhances predictive accuracy and AUC metrics when additional features exhibit distinct predictive capabilities, as evidenced by synthetic datasets 1-3 and the early diabetes dataset. Specifically, in synthetic dataset 1, iCARE achieved an accuracy of 0.999 and an AUC of 1.000, outperforming the Global approach with an accuracy of 0.689 and an AUC of 0.639. In the early diabetes and heart disease dataset, iCARE shows improvements of 6-12% in accuracy and AUC across different numbers of initial features over other feature selection methods. Conversely, in synthetic datasets 4-5 and the heart failure dataset, where features lack discernible predictive distinctions, iCARE shows no significant advantage over global approaches on accuracy and AUC metrics. iCARE provides personalized feature recommendations that enhance diagnostic accuracy in scenarios where individualized approaches are critical, improving the precision and effectiveness of medical diagnoses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于个性化机器学习的临床评估推荐系统。
传统的临床评估往往缺乏个性化,依赖于标准化的程序,可能无法适应患者的多样化需求,特别是在个性化诊断可以提供显著益处的早期阶段。我们的目标是提供一个机器学习框架,以解决个性化特征添加问题,并提高临床评估的诊断准确性。个体化临床评估推荐系统(iCARE)采用局部加权逻辑回归和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值分析,根据患者个体特征进行特征选择。对合成和现实世界的数据集进行了评估,包括早期糖尿病风险预测和UCI机器学习存储库中的心力衰竭临床记录。我们比较了iCARE与Global方法的性能,使用准确性和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)的统计分析来选择最佳的附加特征。如合成数据集1-3和早期糖尿病数据集所证明的那样,当附加特征表现出明显的预测能力时,iCARE框架提高了预测准确性和AUC指标。具体而言,在合成数据集1中,iCARE的准确率为0.999,AUC为1.000,优于Global方法的准确率为0.689,AUC为0.639。在早期糖尿病和心脏病数据集中,iCARE在不同数量的初始特征上的准确率和AUC比其他特征选择方法提高了6-12%。相反,在合成数据集4-5和心力衰竭数据集中,其特征缺乏可识别的预测差异,iCARE在准确性和AUC指标上没有比全球方法显着的优势。iCARE提供个性化的功能建议,在个性化方法至关重要的情况下提高诊断的准确性,提高医疗诊断的准确性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信