Residual Gaze Behavior During Navigation in Blindness and Low Vision.

ArXiv Pub Date : 2025-09-15
Junchi Feng, Fernanda Garcia-Piña, Mahya Beheshti, Todd E Hudson, William Seiple, John-Ross Rizzo
{"title":"Residual Gaze Behavior During Navigation in Blindness and Low Vision.","authors":"Junchi Feng, Fernanda Garcia-Piña, Mahya Beheshti, Todd E Hudson, William Seiple, John-Ross Rizzo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outdoor navigation poses significant challenges for people with blindness or low vision, yet the role of gaze behavior in supporting mobility remains underexplored. Fully sighted individuals typically adopt consistent scanning strategies, whereas those with visual impairments rely on heterogeneous adaptations shaped by residual vision and experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative eye-tracking study of fully sighted, low vision, blind, and fully blind participants navigating outdoor routes. Using a wearable eye tracker, we quantified fixation counts, fixation rate, fixation area, direction, peak fixation location, and walking speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Walking speed declined systematically with worsening vision. Fixation count increased with greater impairment, reflecting slower travel times and more frequent sampling. Fixation rate rose with worsening vision, though between-group differences were generally not significant between most groups. Fixation spatial coverage decreased along the continuum of vision loss. Fixation patterns were most consistent in the fully sighted group. Peak fixation locations were centered in fully sighted participants but shifted outward and became more variable with impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gaze strategies during navigation form a graded continuum across vision groups, with fully sighted and fully blind participants at opposite poles and low vision and blind groups spanning the middle. Visual acuity alone does not predict functional gaze use, as rehabilitation experience and adaptive strategies strongly shape behavior. These findings highlight the need for personalized rehabilitation and assistive technologies, with residual gaze patterns offering insight into mobility capacity and training opportunities for safer navigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outdoor navigation poses significant challenges for people with blindness or low vision, yet the role of gaze behavior in supporting mobility remains underexplored. Fully sighted individuals typically adopt consistent scanning strategies, whereas those with visual impairments rely on heterogeneous adaptations shaped by residual vision and experience.

Methods: We conducted a comparative eye-tracking study of fully sighted, low vision, blind, and fully blind participants navigating outdoor routes. Using a wearable eye tracker, we quantified fixation counts, fixation rate, fixation area, direction, peak fixation location, and walking speed.

Results: Walking speed declined systematically with worsening vision. Fixation count increased with greater impairment, reflecting slower travel times and more frequent sampling. Fixation rate rose with worsening vision, though between-group differences were generally not significant between most groups. Fixation spatial coverage decreased along the continuum of vision loss. Fixation patterns were most consistent in the fully sighted group. Peak fixation locations were centered in fully sighted participants but shifted outward and became more variable with impairment.

Conclusion: Gaze strategies during navigation form a graded continuum across vision groups, with fully sighted and fully blind participants at opposite poles and low vision and blind groups spanning the middle. Visual acuity alone does not predict functional gaze use, as rehabilitation experience and adaptive strategies strongly shape behavior. These findings highlight the need for personalized rehabilitation and assistive technologies, with residual gaze patterns offering insight into mobility capacity and training opportunities for safer navigation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

盲症和低视力导航时的剩余注视行为。
背景:户外导航对失明或视力低下的人来说是一个巨大的挑战,然而凝视行为在支持移动中的作用仍然没有得到充分的研究。视力完全正常的人通常采用一致的扫描策略,而视力受损的人则依赖于由残余视力和经验形成的异质适应。方法:我们对完全视力、低视力、失明和完全失明的受试者进行了对比眼动追踪研究。使用可穿戴眼动仪,我们量化了注视次数、注视率、注视面积、注视方向、注视峰值位置和行走速度。结果:随着视力的恶化,步行速度有系统地下降。固定计数随着损伤的增加而增加,反映了更慢的旅行时间和更频繁的采样。固视率随视力恶化而升高,但多数组间差异不显著。固定空间覆盖范围随着视力的丧失而下降。注视模式在完全视力组最为一致。在视力完全正常的参与者中,注视的峰值位置居中,但向外移动,并且随着损伤变得更加可变。结论:导航过程中的凝视策略在不同视力组之间形成了一个分级连续体,完全视力组和完全失明组处于相对的两极,低视力组和失明组位于中间。视敏度本身不能预测功能性凝视使用,因为康复经验和适应性策略强烈地塑造了行为。这些发现强调了个性化康复和辅助技术的需求,剩余注视模式提供了对移动能力和更安全导航培训机会的洞察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信