AI policy in healthcare: a checklist-based methodology for structured implementation.

IF 3.1
Elena Bignami, Luigino Jalale Darhour, Gabriele Franco, Matteo Guarnieri, Valentina Bellini
{"title":"AI policy in healthcare: a checklist-based methodology for structured implementation.","authors":"Elena Bignami, Luigino Jalale Darhour, Gabriele Franco, Matteo Guarnieri, Valentina Bellini","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00278-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming anaesthesia and intensive care medicine, enhancing diagnostic precision, workflow efficiency, and patient safety. However, deploying AI in high-acuity environments involves regulatory, ethical, and operational challenges. The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), effective 2025, imposes binding obligations on healthcare organizations, creating an urgent need for structured, governance-focused AI policies. This work presents a checklist-based methodology for responsible, safe, ethical, and regulation-aligned AI adoption in clinical units.</p><p><strong>The need for a methodology to develop an ai policy: </strong>Effective AI policies must ensure transparency, safety, fairness, and regulatory compliance while remaining adaptable to rapid technological and legislative changes. The proposed methodology employs a domain-specific checklist to generate critical evaluative questions, enabling healthcare professionals to systematically assess AI systems' appropriateness, reliability, and legal implications without relying on rigid, quickly outdated prescriptive rules.</p><p><strong>The ai act and its relevance: </strong>Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 establishes the first comprehensive AI legal framework, introducing risk-based classification, imposing stringent requirements for high-risk AI, often including medical devices. Compliance obligations extend to both AI-system providers and deployers, making operational compliance instruments and AI literacy programmes essential for lawful implementation.</p><p><strong>Ai literacy: </strong>OBLIGATION AND PLANNING: From February 2025, the AI Act mandates AI literacy for all personnel interacting with AI-systems. Training should cover baseline competencies for all staff, advanced modules for specialists, continuous professional development, and integration of ethical, legal, and governance principles. Competency acquisition and updates must be systematically documented to meet institutional and EU compliance standards.</p><p><strong>Operational checklist for the adoption of ai policy: </strong>The checklist has two integrated domains: clinical and technical validation, including evidence-based performance assessment, real-world validation, MDR compliance, GDPR adherence, and post-deployment monitoring; and governance and compliance, covering AI Act conformity, organizational accountability, decision traceability, human oversight, AI literacy, and structured audit and update mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Future perspectives: </strong>The checklist methodology offers a scalable, adaptable, regulation-ready framework for AI policy development. By embedding legal compliance, clinical safety, governance, and continuous staff training, it supports sustainable AI integration. Future updates will incorporate regulatory changes, real-world feedback, and impact metrics, enhancing AI's contribution to quality, safety, and equity in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00278-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming anaesthesia and intensive care medicine, enhancing diagnostic precision, workflow efficiency, and patient safety. However, deploying AI in high-acuity environments involves regulatory, ethical, and operational challenges. The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), effective 2025, imposes binding obligations on healthcare organizations, creating an urgent need for structured, governance-focused AI policies. This work presents a checklist-based methodology for responsible, safe, ethical, and regulation-aligned AI adoption in clinical units.

The need for a methodology to develop an ai policy: Effective AI policies must ensure transparency, safety, fairness, and regulatory compliance while remaining adaptable to rapid technological and legislative changes. The proposed methodology employs a domain-specific checklist to generate critical evaluative questions, enabling healthcare professionals to systematically assess AI systems' appropriateness, reliability, and legal implications without relying on rigid, quickly outdated prescriptive rules.

The ai act and its relevance: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 establishes the first comprehensive AI legal framework, introducing risk-based classification, imposing stringent requirements for high-risk AI, often including medical devices. Compliance obligations extend to both AI-system providers and deployers, making operational compliance instruments and AI literacy programmes essential for lawful implementation.

Ai literacy: OBLIGATION AND PLANNING: From February 2025, the AI Act mandates AI literacy for all personnel interacting with AI-systems. Training should cover baseline competencies for all staff, advanced modules for specialists, continuous professional development, and integration of ethical, legal, and governance principles. Competency acquisition and updates must be systematically documented to meet institutional and EU compliance standards.

Operational checklist for the adoption of ai policy: The checklist has two integrated domains: clinical and technical validation, including evidence-based performance assessment, real-world validation, MDR compliance, GDPR adherence, and post-deployment monitoring; and governance and compliance, covering AI Act conformity, organizational accountability, decision traceability, human oversight, AI literacy, and structured audit and update mechanisms.

Future perspectives: The checklist methodology offers a scalable, adaptable, regulation-ready framework for AI policy development. By embedding legal compliance, clinical safety, governance, and continuous staff training, it supports sustainable AI integration. Future updates will incorporate regulatory changes, real-world feedback, and impact metrics, enhancing AI's contribution to quality, safety, and equity in patient care.

医疗保健中的人工智能政策:用于结构化实施的基于检查清单的方法。
人工智能(AI)正在改变麻醉和重症监护医学,提高诊断精度、工作流程效率和患者安全。然而,在高度敏感的环境中部署人工智能涉及监管、道德和运营方面的挑战。2025年生效的《欧盟人工智能法案》(AI法案)对医疗机构施加了具有约束力的义务,迫切需要制定以治理为重点的结构化人工智能政策。这项工作提出了一种基于清单的方法,用于临床单位中负责任、安全、道德和符合法规的人工智能采用。制定人工智能政策的方法需求:有效的人工智能政策必须确保透明度、安全性、公平性和法规遵从性,同时保持对快速技术和立法变化的适应性。拟议的方法采用特定领域的检查表来生成关键的评估问题,使医疗保健专业人员能够系统地评估人工智能系统的适当性、可靠性和法律含义,而不依赖于僵化的、迅速过时的规范性规则。人工智能法案及其相关性:法规(EU) 2024/1689建立了第一个全面的人工智能法律框架,引入了基于风险的分类,对高风险人工智能(通常包括医疗设备)提出了严格的要求。合规义务延伸到人工智能系统提供商和部署者,使业务合规工具和人工智能扫盲计划对合法实施至关重要。人工智能素养:义务和规划:从2025年2月起,《人工智能法案》要求所有与人工智能系统交互的人员具备人工智能素养。培训应包括所有工作人员的基本能力、专家的高级模块、持续的专业发展以及道德、法律和治理原则的整合。能力获取和更新必须系统地记录,以满足机构和欧盟合规标准。采用人工智能政策的操作清单:该清单有两个综合领域:临床和技术验证,包括循证绩效评估、现实验证、MDR合规性、GDPR遵守性和部署后监测;以及治理和遵从性,包括人工智能法案的一致性、组织责任、决策可追溯性、人类监督、人工智能素养以及结构化的审计和更新机制。未来展望:清单方法为人工智能政策制定提供了一个可扩展、可适应、可监管的框架。通过嵌入法律合规性、临床安全、治理和持续的员工培训,它支持可持续的人工智能集成。未来的更新将纳入监管变化、现实世界的反馈和影响指标,增强人工智能对患者护理质量、安全性和公平性的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信