Deep Learning for Standardized Head CT Reformatting: A Quantitative Analysis of Image Quality and Operator Variability.

Peter D Chang, Eleanor Chu, David Floriolli, Jennifer Soun, David Fussell
{"title":"Deep Learning for Standardized Head CT Reformatting: A Quantitative Analysis of Image Quality and Operator Variability.","authors":"Peter D Chang, Eleanor Chu, David Floriolli, Jennifer Soun, David Fussell","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate a deep learning foundation model for automated head computed tomography (CT) reformatting and to quantify the quality, speed, and variability of conventional manual reformats in a real-world dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A foundation artificial intelligence (AI) model was used to create automated reformats for 1,763 consecutive non-contrast head CT examinations. Model accuracy was first validated on a 100-exam subset by assessing landmark detection as well as rotational, centering, and zoom error against expert manual annotations. The validated model was subsequently used as a reference standard to evaluate the quality and speed of the original technician-generated reformats from the full dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model demonstrated high concordance with expert annotations, with a mean landmark localization error of 0.6-0.9 mm. Compared to expert-defined planes, AI-generated reformats exhibited a mean rotational error of 0.7 degrees, a mean centering error of 0.3%, and a mean zoom error of 0.4%. By contrast, technician-generated reformats demonstrated a mean rotational error of 11.2 degrees, a mean centering error of 6.4%, and a mean zoom error of 6.2%. Significant variability in manual reformat quality was observed across different factors including patient age, scanner location, report findings, and individual technician operators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Manual head CT reformatting is subject to substantial variability in both quality and speed. A single-shot deep learning foundation model can generate reformats with high accuracy and consistency. The implementation of such an automated method offers the potential to improve standardization, increase workflow efficiency, and reduce operational costs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a deep learning foundation model for automated head computed tomography (CT) reformatting and to quantify the quality, speed, and variability of conventional manual reformats in a real-world dataset.

Methods: A foundation artificial intelligence (AI) model was used to create automated reformats for 1,763 consecutive non-contrast head CT examinations. Model accuracy was first validated on a 100-exam subset by assessing landmark detection as well as rotational, centering, and zoom error against expert manual annotations. The validated model was subsequently used as a reference standard to evaluate the quality and speed of the original technician-generated reformats from the full dataset.

Results: The AI model demonstrated high concordance with expert annotations, with a mean landmark localization error of 0.6-0.9 mm. Compared to expert-defined planes, AI-generated reformats exhibited a mean rotational error of 0.7 degrees, a mean centering error of 0.3%, and a mean zoom error of 0.4%. By contrast, technician-generated reformats demonstrated a mean rotational error of 11.2 degrees, a mean centering error of 6.4%, and a mean zoom error of 6.2%. Significant variability in manual reformat quality was observed across different factors including patient age, scanner location, report findings, and individual technician operators.

Conclusion: Manual head CT reformatting is subject to substantial variability in both quality and speed. A single-shot deep learning foundation model can generate reformats with high accuracy and consistency. The implementation of such an automated method offers the potential to improve standardization, increase workflow efficiency, and reduce operational costs in clinical practice.

标准化头部CT重格式化的深度学习:图像质量和算子可变性的定量分析。
目的:验证用于自动头部计算机断层扫描(CT)重新格式化的深度学习基础模型,并量化现实世界数据集中传统手动重新格式化的质量、速度和可变性。方法:采用基础人工智能(AI)模型对1763例连续非对比头部CT检查进行自动格式化。首先在100个测试子集上验证模型的准确性,通过评估地标检测以及针对专家手动注释的旋转、定心和缩放误差。经过验证的模型随后被用作参考标准,以评估来自完整数据集的原始技术人员生成的重新格式化的质量和速度。结果:人工智能模型与专家标注具有较高的一致性,平均地标定位误差为0.6-0.9 mm。与专家定义的平面相比,人工智能生成的重新格式化显示出平均旋转误差为0.7度,平均定心误差为0.3%,平均缩放误差为0.4%。相比之下,技术人员生成的重新格式化显示平均旋转误差为11.2度,平均定心误差为6.4%,平均变焦误差为6.2%。人工格式化质量的显著差异在不同的因素中被观察到,包括患者年龄、扫描仪位置、报告结果和单个技术操作员。结论:手动头部CT重新格式化在质量和速度上都存在很大的差异。单次深度学习基础模型可以生成精度高、一致性好的重格式。这种自动化方法的实施提供了在临床实践中提高标准化、提高工作流程效率和降低操作成本的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信