Writing Manuscript "Bookends": Strategies to Effectively Frame Science.

Justine S Sefcik, Amy Glasofer, Matthew Lee Smith
{"title":"Writing Manuscript \"Bookends\": Strategies to Effectively Frame Science.","authors":"Justine S Sefcik, Amy Glasofer, Matthew Lee Smith","doi":"10.4148/2572-1836.1258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction and discussion sections play pivotal roles in peer-reviewed manuscripts, yet many authors struggle with these sections. This commentary describes the significance of the introduction and discussion sections for successful publishing, identifies essential components of these sections, and provides recommendations for writing quality introductions and discussions. The introduction defines the problem to be addressed, identifies what is known and unknown about the problem, and states the study purpose. It begins broadly by introducing the area of interest, narrows to identify the specific focus and gap in knowledge, and finally ends with the aim of the present study, seamlessly leading to the methods and results sections. Discussion sections restate the study purpose, interpret the most compelling findings, situate them within the context of existing literature and frameworks, describe study limitations, and provide recommendations for future research and practice. The discussion ends with a brief conclusion paragraph explaining the study's relevance and implications to the field. The introduction and discussion sections are the \"bookends\" of the scientific manuscript. Successful bookends increase the chances of framing science, getting manuscripts published, and contributing to scientific literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":73205,"journal":{"name":"Health behavior research","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health behavior research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction and discussion sections play pivotal roles in peer-reviewed manuscripts, yet many authors struggle with these sections. This commentary describes the significance of the introduction and discussion sections for successful publishing, identifies essential components of these sections, and provides recommendations for writing quality introductions and discussions. The introduction defines the problem to be addressed, identifies what is known and unknown about the problem, and states the study purpose. It begins broadly by introducing the area of interest, narrows to identify the specific focus and gap in knowledge, and finally ends with the aim of the present study, seamlessly leading to the methods and results sections. Discussion sections restate the study purpose, interpret the most compelling findings, situate them within the context of existing literature and frameworks, describe study limitations, and provide recommendations for future research and practice. The discussion ends with a brief conclusion paragraph explaining the study's relevance and implications to the field. The introduction and discussion sections are the "bookends" of the scientific manuscript. Successful bookends increase the chances of framing science, getting manuscripts published, and contributing to scientific literature.

写作手稿“书夹”:有效框架科学的策略。
引言和讨论部分在同行评审的手稿中扮演着关键的角色,然而许多作者都在为这些部分而挣扎。这篇评论描述了引言和讨论部分对成功出版的重要性,确定了这些部分的基本组成部分,并为编写高质量的引言和讨论提供了建议。引言定义了要解决的问题,确定了问题的已知和未知,并陈述了研究目的。它从介绍感兴趣的领域开始,缩小到确定具体的焦点和知识差距,最后以本研究的目的结束,无缝地引导到方法和结果部分。讨论部分重申研究目的,解释最引人注目的发现,将它们置于现有文献和框架的背景下,描述研究的局限性,并为未来的研究和实践提供建议。讨论以简短的结论段结束,解释研究的相关性和对该领域的影响。引言和讨论部分是科学手稿的“书尾”。成功的书夹增加了构建科学、发表手稿和为科学文献做出贡献的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信