Definitive Field Care: The Modern Application of a Historical Strategy.

Q3 Medicine
Jason M Hiles, Luke J Hofmann, April A Grant, R David Hardin
{"title":"Definitive Field Care: The Modern Application of a Historical Strategy.","authors":"Jason M Hiles, Luke J Hofmann, April A Grant, R David Hardin","doi":"10.55460/NPPC-CLHM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Definitive Field Care (DFC) is a medical strategy required when evacuation is impossible due to tactical, environmental, or political constraints. Unlike Prolonged Field Care (PFC) or Prolonged Casualty Care (PCC), which assume eventual evacuation, DFC places full responsibility for definitive treatment on the initial provider. Historical examples, such as the Yugoslavian Partisans in World War II and Afghan resistance fighters during the Soviet invasion, highlight the necessity of DFC in austere, high-risk environments. Key considerations include operational constraints, risk tolerance, and provider mindset. Without evacuation, medical priorities shift, requiring difficult decisions. Providers must adapt to scarce resources, hostile conditions, and the absence of Geneva Convention protections. The mindset required demands resilience, adaptability, and acceptance of non-Western medical standards. As irregular warfare becomes more prevalent, formally recognizing, studying, and integrating DFC into military and humanitarian medical planning is essential. Training personnel for DFC will enhance operational effectiveness and improve survival rates in extreme conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"115-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/NPPC-CLHM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Definitive Field Care (DFC) is a medical strategy required when evacuation is impossible due to tactical, environmental, or political constraints. Unlike Prolonged Field Care (PFC) or Prolonged Casualty Care (PCC), which assume eventual evacuation, DFC places full responsibility for definitive treatment on the initial provider. Historical examples, such as the Yugoslavian Partisans in World War II and Afghan resistance fighters during the Soviet invasion, highlight the necessity of DFC in austere, high-risk environments. Key considerations include operational constraints, risk tolerance, and provider mindset. Without evacuation, medical priorities shift, requiring difficult decisions. Providers must adapt to scarce resources, hostile conditions, and the absence of Geneva Convention protections. The mindset required demands resilience, adaptability, and acceptance of non-Western medical standards. As irregular warfare becomes more prevalent, formally recognizing, studying, and integrating DFC into military and humanitarian medical planning is essential. Training personnel for DFC will enhance operational effectiveness and improve survival rates in extreme conditions.

明确的田野关怀:历史战略的现代应用。
明确的现场护理(DFC)是由于战术、环境或政治限制而无法撤离时所需的医疗策略。与承担最终撤离的长期战地护理(PFC)或长期伤亡护理(PCC)不同,DFC将最终治疗的全部责任交给最初的提供者。历史上的例子,如第二次世界大战中的南斯拉夫游击队和苏联入侵期间的阿富汗抵抗战士,都突出了在严峻、高风险的环境中进行DFC的必要性。关键的考虑因素包括操作约束、风险容忍度和提供者心态。没有撤离,医疗重点就会改变,需要做出艰难的决定。提供者必须适应稀缺的资源、恶劣的环境和缺乏《日内瓦公约》的保护。所需的心态要求韧性、适应性和对非西方医疗标准的接受。随着非正规战争变得越来越普遍,正式承认、研究和将DFC纳入军事和人道主义医疗规划是至关重要的。培训DFC人员将提高作战效率,提高极端条件下的存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信