Nora E Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jeffrey N Doucette
{"title":"Measuring the Impact of High-Performing Nurse Managers on Nurse Outcomes Across Clinical Settings.","authors":"Nora E Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jeffrey N Doucette","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this article was to compare nurse outcomes between high-performing and low-performing nurse managers (NMs) across clinical settings and discuss financial savings associated with high-performing NMs.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>When NMs are provided with an environment that allows them to perform at a high level, their impact can be measured in terms of their nursing unit outcomes. Understanding the differences achieved between high-performing and low-performing NMs may provide insights on the return on investment in redesigning the NM role.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators annual RN survey were used to examine the relationships among variables across care settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-performing NMs across clinical settings achieved significantly higher RN intent to stay, higher quality of care, and lower missed nursing care, compared with low-performing NMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-performing NMs achieved superior nurse outcomes with implications for the quality of nursing care and patient outcomes. Although coaching underperforming NMs is intuitive, mentoring high-performing NMs may yield greater benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this article was to compare nurse outcomes between high-performing and low-performing nurse managers (NMs) across clinical settings and discuss financial savings associated with high-performing NMs.
Background: When NMs are provided with an environment that allows them to perform at a high level, their impact can be measured in terms of their nursing unit outcomes. Understanding the differences achieved between high-performing and low-performing NMs may provide insights on the return on investment in redesigning the NM role.
Methods: Data from the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators annual RN survey were used to examine the relationships among variables across care settings.
Results: High-performing NMs across clinical settings achieved significantly higher RN intent to stay, higher quality of care, and lower missed nursing care, compared with low-performing NMs.
Conclusions: High-performing NMs achieved superior nurse outcomes with implications for the quality of nursing care and patient outcomes. Although coaching underperforming NMs is intuitive, mentoring high-performing NMs may yield greater benefit.
期刊介绍:
JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.