Robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement using a novel hybrid dilator technique: A clinical series of 565 screws.

IF 1.3 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Abhishek Soni, S Vidyadhara, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, T Balamurugan
{"title":"Robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement using a novel hybrid dilator technique: A clinical series of 565 screws.","authors":"Abhishek Soni, S Vidyadhara, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, T Balamurugan","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_115_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical pedicle screws provide superior biomechanical fixation with pullout strength four times greater than lateral mass screws, but placement is technically demanding with traditional malposition rates of 6.7%-31.6%. Robotic-assisted spine surgery has demonstrated success in thoracolumbar applications, but cervical translation has been hindered by the lack of cervical-specific instrumentation requiring expensive custom instruments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a hybrid technique combining robotic guidance with standard cervical instrumentation using minimally invasive surgery dilators as an interface. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement with 565 screws across C2-C7 levels using MazorX Stealth robotic system with O-arm navigation. Accuracy was assessed using Gertzbein-Robbins and Neo classification systems with 3-6-month follow-up for complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technique achieved 98.76% clinically acceptable accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins Grade A + B) with 1.24% breach rate. Perfect placement (Grade A) occurred in 95.22% of screws. Vertebral artery protection was excellent with 99.65% showing no foramen breach. Major complications occurred in 1.5% of patients (single vertebral artery injury), with 7.7% experiencing transient C5 weakness that resolved completely. No patients required revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This hybrid technique addresses instrument compatibility barriers in robotic cervical spine surgery by eliminating dependence on custom instruments while maintaining robotic accuracy. The technique demonstrates superior outcomes compared to traditional approaches and facilitates broader robotic cervical surgery adoption. Multi-center validation studies are needed to establish the generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 3","pages":"301-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_115_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical pedicle screws provide superior biomechanical fixation with pullout strength four times greater than lateral mass screws, but placement is technically demanding with traditional malposition rates of 6.7%-31.6%. Robotic-assisted spine surgery has demonstrated success in thoracolumbar applications, but cervical translation has been hindered by the lack of cervical-specific instrumentation requiring expensive custom instruments.

Methods: We developed a hybrid technique combining robotic guidance with standard cervical instrumentation using minimally invasive surgery dilators as an interface. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement with 565 screws across C2-C7 levels using MazorX Stealth robotic system with O-arm navigation. Accuracy was assessed using Gertzbein-Robbins and Neo classification systems with 3-6-month follow-up for complications.

Results: The technique achieved 98.76% clinically acceptable accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins Grade A + B) with 1.24% breach rate. Perfect placement (Grade A) occurred in 95.22% of screws. Vertebral artery protection was excellent with 99.65% showing no foramen breach. Major complications occurred in 1.5% of patients (single vertebral artery injury), with 7.7% experiencing transient C5 weakness that resolved completely. No patients required revision surgery.

Conclusions: This hybrid technique addresses instrument compatibility barriers in robotic cervical spine surgery by eliminating dependence on custom instruments while maintaining robotic accuracy. The technique demonstrates superior outcomes compared to traditional approaches and facilitates broader robotic cervical surgery adoption. Multi-center validation studies are needed to establish the generalizability.

采用新型混合扩张器技术的机器人辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入:临床565颗螺钉。
背景:颈椎椎弓根螺钉提供了优越的生物力学固定,其拔出强度是侧块螺钉的4倍,但其放置技术要求较高,传统的错位率为6.7%-31.6%。机器人辅助脊柱手术在胸腰椎的应用已经证明是成功的,但是由于缺乏颈椎专用器械,需要昂贵的定制器械,颈椎移位一直受到阻碍。方法:我们开发了一种结合机器人引导和标准颈椎内固定的混合技术,使用微创手术扩张器作为接口。连续65例患者使用带有o型臂导航的MazorX Stealth机器人系统进行机器人辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入,共565颗螺钉穿过C2-C7节段。采用Gertzbein-Robbins和Neo分类系统进行准确性评估,并发症随访3-6个月。结果:该技术达到98.76%的临床可接受准确率(Gertzbein-Robbins分级A + B),漏检率为1.24%。95.22%的螺钉放置完美(A级)。椎动脉保护良好,99.65%无椎间孔破裂。1.5%的患者出现主要并发症(单椎动脉损伤),7.7%的患者出现短暂的C5无力,但完全消失。没有患者需要翻修手术。结论:这种混合技术消除了对定制器械的依赖,同时保持了机器人的准确性,解决了机器人颈椎手术中器械的兼容性障碍。与传统方法相比,该技术显示出更好的效果,并促进了机器人颈椎手术的广泛采用。需要多中心验证研究来确定其普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信