Tina Skinner, Kristine Brance, Sarah Halligan, Emily Tsang, Heather Girling
{"title":"Coping with Emotionally Challenging Research: Developing a Strategic Approach to Researcher Wellbeing.","authors":"Tina Skinner, Kristine Brance, Sarah Halligan, Emily Tsang, Heather Girling","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09665-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While previous work has highlighted the possible impacts of undertaking emotionally challenging research, it is only recently, particularly within the UK with the 2028 Research Excellence Framework focus on research culture, that this subject is starting to gain senior leadership attention. Funded by the UK Research and Innovation, Researcher England, Enhancing Research Culture fund. We undertook an in-depth study involving researchers across topics and disciplines in the humanities and social science, with the objectives of establishing: the impacts of studying emotionally challenging topics on researchers, what they currently found helpful in preventing and/or coping with these impacts, and what additional support they wanted. In this paper we report on findings related to the latter two objectives to provide insight into how future research projects could be ethically designed to minimize distress, secondary and vicarious trauma in researchers. We then use these findings to formulate an innovative strategic institutional response to researcher wellbeing and emotionally challenging studies that can be implemented in three stages: <i>Bronze</i>, which is focused on awareness raising and the development of policies and guidance that are built into ethical procedures; <i>Silver</i>, involving the establishment of training, clear referral pathways, and (funded) Researcher Wellbeing Plans - including regular academic supervision, team working, and extra time in workloads to undertake wellbeing interventions - built into the design of projects; and <i>Gold</i>, a wholistic institutional response where, in addition to the above, policies, processes, practices and culture are proactively attentive to the prevention of and provision for distress relating to emotionally challenging research.</p>","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":"23 4","pages":"2559-2583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09665-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While previous work has highlighted the possible impacts of undertaking emotionally challenging research, it is only recently, particularly within the UK with the 2028 Research Excellence Framework focus on research culture, that this subject is starting to gain senior leadership attention. Funded by the UK Research and Innovation, Researcher England, Enhancing Research Culture fund. We undertook an in-depth study involving researchers across topics and disciplines in the humanities and social science, with the objectives of establishing: the impacts of studying emotionally challenging topics on researchers, what they currently found helpful in preventing and/or coping with these impacts, and what additional support they wanted. In this paper we report on findings related to the latter two objectives to provide insight into how future research projects could be ethically designed to minimize distress, secondary and vicarious trauma in researchers. We then use these findings to formulate an innovative strategic institutional response to researcher wellbeing and emotionally challenging studies that can be implemented in three stages: Bronze, which is focused on awareness raising and the development of policies and guidance that are built into ethical procedures; Silver, involving the establishment of training, clear referral pathways, and (funded) Researcher Wellbeing Plans - including regular academic supervision, team working, and extra time in workloads to undertake wellbeing interventions - built into the design of projects; and Gold, a wholistic institutional response where, in addition to the above, policies, processes, practices and culture are proactively attentive to the prevention of and provision for distress relating to emotionally challenging research.
虽然之前的工作强调了进行具有情感挑战性的研究可能产生的影响,但直到最近,特别是在英国,随着2028年研究卓越框架(2028 research Excellence Framework)关注研究文化,这一主题才开始获得高层领导的关注。由英国研究与创新,英国研究员,加强研究文化基金资助。我们进行了一项深入的研究,涉及人文和社会科学领域的不同主题和学科的研究人员,目的是确定:研究具有情感挑战性的主题对研究人员的影响,他们目前发现哪些有助于预防和/或应对这些影响,以及他们需要哪些额外的支持。在本文中,我们报告了与后两个目标相关的研究结果,以深入了解如何在伦理上设计未来的研究项目,以尽量减少研究人员的痛苦,继发性和间接创伤。然后,我们利用这些发现制定了一个创新的战略机构响应研究人员的福祉和情感挑战研究,可以分三个阶段实施:青铜阶段,重点是提高认识,制定政策和指导,这些政策和指导是建立在道德程序中;Silver,包括建立培训、明确的转诊途径和(资助的)研究人员福利计划——包括定期的学术监督、团队合作和额外的工作量来进行福利干预——纳入项目设计;和Gold,这是一个整体的机构反应,除了上述,政策,流程,实践和文化都积极关注与情感挑战性研究相关的痛苦的预防和提供。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Academic Ethics is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary, peer reviewed journal which examines all ethical issues which arise within the scope of university purposes. The journal publishes original research in the ethics of research production and publication; teaching and student relations; leadership; management and governance. The journal offers sustained inquiry into such topics as the ethics of university strategic directions; ethical investments; sustainability practices; the responsible conduct of research and teaching; collegiality and faculty relations; and the appropriate models of ethical and accountable governance for universities in the 21st century.