Harnessing Visual Neuroplasticity Through Auditory Biofeedback-Functional and Electrophysiological Gains Across Retinal, Optic-Nerve, and Cortical Visual Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marco Zeppieri, Roberta Amato, Daniela Catania, Mutali Musa, Alessandro Avitabile, Fabiana D'Esposito, Caterina Gagliano, Matteo Capobianco, Simonetta Gaia Nicolosi
{"title":"Harnessing Visual Neuroplasticity Through Auditory Biofeedback-Functional and Electrophysiological Gains Across Retinal, Optic-Nerve, and Cortical Visual Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study.","authors":"Marco Zeppieri, Roberta Amato, Daniela Catania, Mutali Musa, Alessandro Avitabile, Fabiana D'Esposito, Caterina Gagliano, Matteo Capobianco, Simonetta Gaia Nicolosi","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15090170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This prospective pilot study included four participants with chronic visual impairment and assessed functional and electrophysiological recovery following visual evoked potential (VEP)-guided auditory biofeedback across diverse etiologies. Low vision affects more than two billion people worldwide and imposes a sustained personal and socioeconomic burden. Conventional rehabilitation emphasizes optical aids and environmental modification without directly stimulating the visual pathway. Emerging evidence indicates that auditory biofeedback based on real-time cortical activity can leverage adult neuroplasticity. <b>Methods:</b> Four men (mean age 58 ± 12 years) with chronic visual impairment attributable to occipital stroke, stage IV macular hole, end-stage open-angle glaucoma, or diabetic maculopathy completed ten 10-min monocular sessions with the Retimax Vision Trainer over three weeks (15 Hz pattern reversal, 90% contrast). Primary end points were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters) and P100 amplitude/latency. Fixation stability was recorded with MAIA microperimetry when feasible. A focused PubMed review (2010-2025) mapped current evidence and research gaps. <b>Results:</b> Median BCVA improved by seven letters (IQR 0-15); three of eight eyes gained ≥ 10 letters and none lost vision. Mean P100 amplitude increased from 1.0 ± 1.2 µV to 3.0 ± 1.1 µV, while latency shortened by 3.9 ms. Electrophysiological improvement paralleled behavioural gain irrespective of lesion site. No adverse events occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> A concise course of VEP-guided auditory biofeedback produced concordant functional and neurophysiological gains across retinal, optic nerve, and cortical pathologies. These pilot data support integration of closed-loop biofeedback into routine low vision care and justify larger sham-controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15090170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective pilot study included four participants with chronic visual impairment and assessed functional and electrophysiological recovery following visual evoked potential (VEP)-guided auditory biofeedback across diverse etiologies. Low vision affects more than two billion people worldwide and imposes a sustained personal and socioeconomic burden. Conventional rehabilitation emphasizes optical aids and environmental modification without directly stimulating the visual pathway. Emerging evidence indicates that auditory biofeedback based on real-time cortical activity can leverage adult neuroplasticity. Methods: Four men (mean age 58 ± 12 years) with chronic visual impairment attributable to occipital stroke, stage IV macular hole, end-stage open-angle glaucoma, or diabetic maculopathy completed ten 10-min monocular sessions with the Retimax Vision Trainer over three weeks (15 Hz pattern reversal, 90% contrast). Primary end points were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters) and P100 amplitude/latency. Fixation stability was recorded with MAIA microperimetry when feasible. A focused PubMed review (2010-2025) mapped current evidence and research gaps. Results: Median BCVA improved by seven letters (IQR 0-15); three of eight eyes gained ≥ 10 letters and none lost vision. Mean P100 amplitude increased from 1.0 ± 1.2 µV to 3.0 ± 1.1 µV, while latency shortened by 3.9 ms. Electrophysiological improvement paralleled behavioural gain irrespective of lesion site. No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: A concise course of VEP-guided auditory biofeedback produced concordant functional and neurophysiological gains across retinal, optic nerve, and cortical pathologies. These pilot data support integration of closed-loop biofeedback into routine low vision care and justify larger sham-controlled trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过听觉生物反馈利用视觉神经可塑性——视网膜、视神经和皮质视觉损伤的功能和电生理增益:一项前瞻性先导研究。
背景:这项前瞻性先导研究纳入了四名慢性视力障碍患者,并评估了视觉诱发电位(VEP)引导的听觉生物反馈在不同病因下的功能和电生理恢复情况。低视力影响全世界20多亿人,并造成持续的个人和社会经济负担。传统的康复强调光学辅助和环境改造,而不直接刺激视觉通路。越来越多的证据表明,基于实时皮层活动的听觉生物反馈可以利用成人的神经可塑性。方法:4名男性(平均年龄58±12岁),因枕部中风、IV期黄斑孔、终末期开角型青光眼或糖尿病性黄斑病变引起的慢性视力损害,在三周内使用Retimax视力训练器完成10次10分钟的单眼治疗(15 Hz模式反转,90%对比)。主要终点为最佳矫正视力(BCVA, ETDRS字母)和P100振幅/潜伏期。可行时用MAIA显微镜观察固定稳定性。PubMed的一篇重点综述(2010-2025)描绘了当前的证据和研究差距。结果:中位BCVA提高了7个字母(IQR 0-15);8只眼睛中有3只增加了≥10个字母,没有失明。P100平均振幅由1.0±1.2µV增加到3.0±1.1µV,潜伏期缩短3.9 ms。与损伤部位无关,电生理改善与行为增加平行。无不良事件发生。结论:vep引导的简明听觉生物反馈过程在视网膜、视神经和皮层病理中产生了一致的功能和神经生理增益。这些试点数据支持将闭环生物反馈整合到常规低视力护理中,并证明更大规模的假对照试验是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信