Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine: Challenges Across Diagnostic Imaging, Clinical Decision Support, Surgery, Pathology, and Drug Discovery.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eren Ogut
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine: Challenges Across Diagnostic Imaging, Clinical Decision Support, Surgery, Pathology, and Drug Discovery.","authors":"Eren Ogut","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15090169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background:</b> The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical medicine has opened new possibilities for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic decision-making, and biomedical innovation across several domains. This review is aimed to evaluate the clinical applications of AI across five key domains of medicine: diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support systems (CDSS), surgery, pathology, and drug discovery, highlighting achievements, limitations, and future directions. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive PubMed search was performed without language or publication date restrictions, combining Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords for AI with domain-specific terms. The search yielded 2047 records, of which 243 duplicates were removed, leaving 1804 unique studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 1482 records were excluded due to irrelevance, preclinical scope, or lack of patient-level outcomes. Full-text review of 322 articles led to the exclusion of 172 studies (no clinical validation or outcomes, <i>n</i> = 64; methodological studies, <i>n</i> = 43; preclinical and in vitro-only, <i>n</i> = 39; conference abstracts without peer-reviewed full text, <i>n</i> = 26). Ultimately, 150 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively. Data extraction focused on study context, AI technique, dataset characteristics, comparator benchmarks, and reported outcomes, such as diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), efficiency, and clinical improvements. <b>Results:</b> AI demonstrated strong performance in diagnostic imaging, achieving expert-level accuracy in tasks such as cancer detection (AUC up to 0.94). CDSS showed promise in predicting adverse events (sepsis, atrial fibrillation), though real-world outcome evidence was mixed. In surgery, AI enhanced intraoperative guidance and risk stratification. Pathology benefited from AI-assisted diagnosis and molecular inference from histology. AI also accelerated drug discovery through protein structure prediction and virtual screening. However, challenges included limited explainability, data bias, lack of prospective trials, and regulatory hurdles. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI is transforming clinical medicine, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and discovery. Yet, its integration into routine care demands rigorous validation, ethical oversight, and human-AI collaboration. Continued interdisciplinary efforts will be essential to translate these innovations into safe and effective patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15090169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical medicine has opened new possibilities for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic decision-making, and biomedical innovation across several domains. This review is aimed to evaluate the clinical applications of AI across five key domains of medicine: diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support systems (CDSS), surgery, pathology, and drug discovery, highlighting achievements, limitations, and future directions. Methods: A comprehensive PubMed search was performed without language or publication date restrictions, combining Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords for AI with domain-specific terms. The search yielded 2047 records, of which 243 duplicates were removed, leaving 1804 unique studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 1482 records were excluded due to irrelevance, preclinical scope, or lack of patient-level outcomes. Full-text review of 322 articles led to the exclusion of 172 studies (no clinical validation or outcomes, n = 64; methodological studies, n = 43; preclinical and in vitro-only, n = 39; conference abstracts without peer-reviewed full text, n = 26). Ultimately, 150 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively. Data extraction focused on study context, AI technique, dataset characteristics, comparator benchmarks, and reported outcomes, such as diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), efficiency, and clinical improvements. Results: AI demonstrated strong performance in diagnostic imaging, achieving expert-level accuracy in tasks such as cancer detection (AUC up to 0.94). CDSS showed promise in predicting adverse events (sepsis, atrial fibrillation), though real-world outcome evidence was mixed. In surgery, AI enhanced intraoperative guidance and risk stratification. Pathology benefited from AI-assisted diagnosis and molecular inference from histology. AI also accelerated drug discovery through protein structure prediction and virtual screening. However, challenges included limited explainability, data bias, lack of prospective trials, and regulatory hurdles. Conclusions: AI is transforming clinical medicine, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and discovery. Yet, its integration into routine care demands rigorous validation, ethical oversight, and human-AI collaboration. Continued interdisciplinary efforts will be essential to translate these innovations into safe and effective patient-centered care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床医学中的人工智能:跨越诊断成像、临床决策支持、外科、病理学和药物发现的挑战。
目的/背景:人工智能(AI)与临床医学的日益融合,为提高多个领域的诊断准确性、治疗决策和生物医学创新开辟了新的可能性。本综述旨在评估人工智能在医学五个关键领域的临床应用:诊断成像、临床决策支持系统(CDSS)、外科、病理学和药物发现,突出了成就、局限性和未来方向。方法:在没有语言或出版日期限制的情况下进行全面的PubMed搜索,将医学主题词(MeSH)和人工智能的自由文本关键字与领域特定术语结合起来。搜索产生了2047条记录,其中243条重复被删除,留下1804条独特的研究。在筛选标题和摘要后,1482条记录因不相关、临床前范围或缺乏患者水平结果而被排除。对322篇文章的全文审查导致172项研究被排除(没有临床验证或结果,n = 64;方法学研究,n = 43;临床前和体外研究,n = 39;没有同行评议全文的会议摘要,n = 26)。最终,150项研究符合纳入标准,并进行了定性分析。数据提取侧重于研究背景、人工智能技术、数据集特征、比较基准和报告结果,如诊断准确性、曲线下面积(AUC)、效率和临床改善。结果:人工智能在诊断成像方面表现出色,在癌症检测等任务中达到了专家级的准确性(AUC高达0.94)。CDSS在预测不良事件(脓毒症、房颤)方面显示出了希望,尽管实际结果证据不一。在手术中,人工智能增强了术中指导和风险分层。病理学受益于人工智能辅助诊断和组织学的分子推断。人工智能还通过蛋白质结构预测和虚拟筛选加速了药物的发现。然而,挑战包括有限的可解释性、数据偏差、缺乏前瞻性试验和监管障碍。结论:人工智能正在改变临床医学,提高准确性、效率和发现能力。然而,将其整合到常规护理中需要严格的验证、伦理监督和人类与人工智能的合作。要将这些创新转化为安全有效的以患者为中心的护理,持续的跨学科努力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信