All-Oral Shorter Treatment Regimens for Multidrug- and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: Evaluating Their Effectiveness, Safety, and Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients in Lao PDR.
IF 2.3 4区 医学Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vibol Iem, Sakhone Suthepmany, Vongkham Inthavong, Anousone Sisouvanh, Khamloun Choumlivong, Kyung Hyun Oh, Philipp du Cros, Fatimata Bintou Sall, Corinne S Merle, Jacques Sebert, Donekham Inthavong
{"title":"All-Oral Shorter Treatment Regimens for Multidrug- and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: Evaluating Their Effectiveness, Safety, and Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients in Lao PDR.","authors":"Vibol Iem, Sakhone Suthepmany, Vongkham Inthavong, Anousone Sisouvanh, Khamloun Choumlivong, Kyung Hyun Oh, Philipp du Cros, Fatimata Bintou Sall, Corinne S Merle, Jacques Sebert, Donekham Inthavong","doi":"10.1111/tmi.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major public health challenge in Lao PDR, with low second-line treatment uptake and suboptimal outcomes. To improve effectiveness, safety, and tolerability, a shorter all-oral regimen for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) was introduced under the TDR Short, all-Oral Regimens for Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis (ShORRT) initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective and prospective comparative cohort study was conducted across five drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment centres from January 2020 to December 2023. Two programmatic cohorts were analysed during partially overlapping calendar periods: a standard injectable-containing regimen cohort and an all-oral regimen cohort. Outcomes were assessed at the end of treatment and 12 months post-treatment. Safety was evaluated through adverse events, including serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 126 participants, 65 received the all-oral regimen and 61 the standard regimen. Treatment success was higher in the all-oral group (90.8% vs. 80.3%), with lower mortality (7.5% vs. 16.4%) and fewer serious adverse events (12.3% vs. 19.7%). Anaemia was more common in the all-oral group (46.2%), while hepatotoxicity and QTcF prolongation were more frequent in the standard group. Both groups showed improvements in health-related quality of life, but greater recovery in mobility, daily activities, and anxiety reduction was observed in the all-oral group. Between group differences did not reach statistical significance. No cases of tuberculosis recurrence were reported at 12-month follow-up in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this programmatic setting, the all-oral, bedaquiline and linezolid-based regimen demonstrated high effectiveness and acceptable safety. Non-significant trends favoured the all-oral regimen for treatment success, mortality, and quality of life, consistent with but not definitive for improved outcomes. These findings support the transition to all-oral regimens as the preferred approach for drug-resistant tuberculosis care, while acknowledging the observational design and limited power.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major public health challenge in Lao PDR, with low second-line treatment uptake and suboptimal outcomes. To improve effectiveness, safety, and tolerability, a shorter all-oral regimen for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) was introduced under the TDR Short, all-Oral Regimens for Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis (ShORRT) initiative.
Methods: A retrospective and prospective comparative cohort study was conducted across five drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment centres from January 2020 to December 2023. Two programmatic cohorts were analysed during partially overlapping calendar periods: a standard injectable-containing regimen cohort and an all-oral regimen cohort. Outcomes were assessed at the end of treatment and 12 months post-treatment. Safety was evaluated through adverse events, including serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS tools.
Results: Among 126 participants, 65 received the all-oral regimen and 61 the standard regimen. Treatment success was higher in the all-oral group (90.8% vs. 80.3%), with lower mortality (7.5% vs. 16.4%) and fewer serious adverse events (12.3% vs. 19.7%). Anaemia was more common in the all-oral group (46.2%), while hepatotoxicity and QTcF prolongation were more frequent in the standard group. Both groups showed improvements in health-related quality of life, but greater recovery in mobility, daily activities, and anxiety reduction was observed in the all-oral group. Between group differences did not reach statistical significance. No cases of tuberculosis recurrence were reported at 12-month follow-up in either group.
Conclusion: In this programmatic setting, the all-oral, bedaquiline and linezolid-based regimen demonstrated high effectiveness and acceptable safety. Non-significant trends favoured the all-oral regimen for treatment success, mortality, and quality of life, consistent with but not definitive for improved outcomes. These findings support the transition to all-oral regimens as the preferred approach for drug-resistant tuberculosis care, while acknowledging the observational design and limited power.
期刊介绍:
Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).