Estimating the Value of Adding 30 Days to the 180-Day Market Exclusivity of the First-to-File Generic Drug Manufacturer.

IF 2.1 Q2 ECONOMICS
Aylin Sertkaya, Zeid El-Kilani, Sean Klein, Andreas Lord, Ruben Jacobo-Rubio, Sonal Parasrampuria
{"title":"Estimating the Value of Adding 30 Days to the 180-Day Market Exclusivity of the First-to-File Generic Drug Manufacturer.","authors":"Aylin Sertkaya, Zeid El-Kilani, Sean Klein, Andreas Lord, Ruben Jacobo-Rubio, Sonal Parasrampuria","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00607-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As an additional incentive to bringing more generic drugs to more markets sooner, our aim was to estimate the value of adding 30 days to the 180 days of market exclusivity currently granted to a qualifying first-to-file (FTF) generic drug entrant after its manufacturer successfully challenges a brand drug's patents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using IQVIA's monthly data on drug sales in the U.S. from January 2014 through June 2021, we identified 37 generic drug markets in which one or more generic companies successfully challenged the relevant brand drug patents and began commercial marketing within 75 days of receiving final approval of their Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). We compared each generic drug's sales during the last month of its 180-day exclusive market access (Month 6) with its sales during the first month after their exclusivity expired (Month 7). Our calculation of this change in sales accounted for confounding factors such as the presence of an authorized generic in the market during the exclusivity period and the number of new generic entrants in Month 7. This calculated change represents the value to the FTF manufacturer of extending the 180-day market exclusivity to 210 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis shows that an FTF generic experiences a 13.0% reduction in sales from Month 6 to Month 7, on average. Extending the 180-day exclusivity by 30 days could lower the magnitude of this reduction to 3.1%, resulting in a 9.8% gain in sales by the FTF generic. This gain represents about $870,000 in additional sales during Month 7, on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The value of an additional month of exclusivity to a generic firm is sizable and could entice more generic companies on the margin to take on the risk of patent challenges, especially in large markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00607-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: As an additional incentive to bringing more generic drugs to more markets sooner, our aim was to estimate the value of adding 30 days to the 180 days of market exclusivity currently granted to a qualifying first-to-file (FTF) generic drug entrant after its manufacturer successfully challenges a brand drug's patents.

Methods: Using IQVIA's monthly data on drug sales in the U.S. from January 2014 through June 2021, we identified 37 generic drug markets in which one or more generic companies successfully challenged the relevant brand drug patents and began commercial marketing within 75 days of receiving final approval of their Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). We compared each generic drug's sales during the last month of its 180-day exclusive market access (Month 6) with its sales during the first month after their exclusivity expired (Month 7). Our calculation of this change in sales accounted for confounding factors such as the presence of an authorized generic in the market during the exclusivity period and the number of new generic entrants in Month 7. This calculated change represents the value to the FTF manufacturer of extending the 180-day market exclusivity to 210 days.

Results: Our analysis shows that an FTF generic experiences a 13.0% reduction in sales from Month 6 to Month 7, on average. Extending the 180-day exclusivity by 30 days could lower the magnitude of this reduction to 3.1%, resulting in a 9.8% gain in sales by the FTF generic. This gain represents about $870,000 in additional sales during Month 7, on average.

Conclusions: The value of an additional month of exclusivity to a generic firm is sizable and could entice more generic companies on the margin to take on the risk of patent challenges, especially in large markets.

预估首次申请仿制药制造商180天市场独占期增加30天的价值
目标:作为将更多仿制药更快推向更多市场的额外激励措施,我们的目标是估计在制造商成功挑战品牌药专利后,目前授予合格的首次申请(FTF)仿制药进入者的180天市场独占权增加30天的价值。方法:利用IQVIA 2014年1月至2021年6月在美国的月度药品销售数据,我们确定了37个仿制药市场,其中一家或多家仿制药公司成功挑战相关品牌药专利,并在获得简略新药申请(ANDA)最终批准后的75天内开始商业营销。我们比较了每种仿制药在其180天独占市场准入的最后一个月(第6个月)和其独占期到期后第一个月(第7个月)的销售情况。我们对这一销售变化的计算考虑了混淆因素,如专有权期间市场上授权仿制药的存在以及第7个月新进入仿制药的数量。这一计算变化代表了FTF制造商将180天的市场排他性延长至210天的价值。结果:我们的分析显示,从第6个月到第7个月,FTF仿制药的销量平均下降了13.0%。将180天的排他性延长30天可以将这一降幅降至3.1%,从而使FTF仿制药的销售额增加9.8%。这意味着第7个月的平均销售额增加了87万美元。结论:对仿制药公司来说,额外一个月的排他性的价值是相当大的,并且可以吸引更多的仿制药公司在边际上承担专利挑战的风险,特别是在大型市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信