Oral β-lactam combinations are effective in vitro against Mycobacterium avium, regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Maiko Yoshikawa, Tomoyasu Nishimura, Kana Misawa, Rina Shimamura, Kenta Suzuki, Shoko Kashimura, Yuki Igarashi, Yuki Enoki, Kazuaki Taguchi, Naoki Hasegawa, Ho Namkoong, Kazuaki Matsumoto
{"title":"Oral β-lactam combinations are effective <i>in vitro</i> against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i>, regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility.","authors":"Maiko Yoshikawa, Tomoyasu Nishimura, Kana Misawa, Rina Shimamura, Kenta Suzuki, Shoko Kashimura, Yuki Igarashi, Yuki Enoki, Kazuaki Taguchi, Naoki Hasegawa, Ho Namkoong, Kazuaki Matsumoto","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02012-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global incidence and prevalence of pulmonary disease caused by the <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex (MAC), mainly comprising <i>M. avium</i> and <i>Mycobacterium intracellulare</i>, is increasing. However, treating MAC pulmonary disease is challenging in cases of clarithromycin (CLR)-resistant MAC or where the patients experience adverse effects or drug interactions with the few available antibiotics. Therefore, developing novel and highly effective antibiotics against MAC is crucial. Although the efficacy of dual β-lactams against <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> has been receiving attention, the efficacy of dual β-lactams against MAC remains unclear. Here, we used MAC type strains and clinical isolates to determine whether dual β-lactams were effective against MAC and which combinations synergistically inhibited bacterial growth using a broth microdilution checkerboard assay with 6 oral and 22 intravenous antibiotics. The combination effect and antibacterial activity differed between <i>M. avium</i> and <i>M. intracellulare</i>. Five combinations of oral β-lactams and 78 combinations of intravenous β-lactams showed a synergistic effect against the <i>M. avium</i> type strain. Among the <i>M. avium</i> clinical isolates, faropenem combined with cefuroxime showed the highest synergistic effect, and amoxicillin combined with tebipenem showed the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration. There was no significant difference in the combination effects between the CLR-susceptible and CLR-resistant <i>M. avium</i> clinical isolates in these pairs. In conclusion, regardless of CLR susceptibility, the oral β-lactam combinations were effective against <i>M. avium</i>. Thus, when treating MAC pulmonary disease, it is crucial to determine whether <i>M. avium</i> or <i>M. intracellulare</i> is the cause.IMPORTANCE<i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex causes chronic respiratory infections, but treatment is often limited by drug resistance, intolerance, or interactions. As new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed, we focused on β-lactam antibiotics, which are widely used and well tolerated. Although dual β-lactams are effective against <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i>, their utility against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex has remained largely unexplored. Our <i>in vitro</i> study revealed that several β-lactam combinations are effective against <i>Mycobacterium avium</i>, regardless of drug resistance, indicating potential for clinical use. In contrast, <i>Mycobacterium intracellulare</i> showed lower susceptibility to β-lactams. Given this difference in drug susceptibility, we emphasize the clinical need to distinguish <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> and <i>Mycobacterium intracellulare</i> to optimize treatment of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex pulmonary disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0201225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02012-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global incidence and prevalence of pulmonary disease caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), mainly comprising M. avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare, is increasing. However, treating MAC pulmonary disease is challenging in cases of clarithromycin (CLR)-resistant MAC or where the patients experience adverse effects or drug interactions with the few available antibiotics. Therefore, developing novel and highly effective antibiotics against MAC is crucial. Although the efficacy of dual β-lactams against Mycobacterium abscessus has been receiving attention, the efficacy of dual β-lactams against MAC remains unclear. Here, we used MAC type strains and clinical isolates to determine whether dual β-lactams were effective against MAC and which combinations synergistically inhibited bacterial growth using a broth microdilution checkerboard assay with 6 oral and 22 intravenous antibiotics. The combination effect and antibacterial activity differed between M. avium and M. intracellulare. Five combinations of oral β-lactams and 78 combinations of intravenous β-lactams showed a synergistic effect against the M. avium type strain. Among the M. avium clinical isolates, faropenem combined with cefuroxime showed the highest synergistic effect, and amoxicillin combined with tebipenem showed the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration. There was no significant difference in the combination effects between the CLR-susceptible and CLR-resistant M. avium clinical isolates in these pairs. In conclusion, regardless of CLR susceptibility, the oral β-lactam combinations were effective against M. avium. Thus, when treating MAC pulmonary disease, it is crucial to determine whether M. avium or M. intracellulare is the cause.IMPORTANCEMycobacterium avium complex causes chronic respiratory infections, but treatment is often limited by drug resistance, intolerance, or interactions. As new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed, we focused on β-lactam antibiotics, which are widely used and well tolerated. Although dual β-lactams are effective against Mycobacterium abscessus, their utility against Mycobacterium avium complex has remained largely unexplored. Our in vitro study revealed that several β-lactam combinations are effective against Mycobacterium avium, regardless of drug resistance, indicating potential for clinical use. In contrast, Mycobacterium intracellulare showed lower susceptibility to β-lactams. Given this difference in drug susceptibility, we emphasize the clinical need to distinguish Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare to optimize treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease.

口服β-内酰胺联合用药对体外抗鸟分枝杆菌有效,不考虑克拉霉素敏感性。
主要由鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌组成的鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)引起的肺部疾病的全球发病率和患病率正在增加。然而,在克拉霉素(CLR)耐药的MAC或患者出现不良反应或与少数可用抗生素药物相互作用的情况下,治疗MAC肺部疾病具有挑战性。因此,开发新型高效的抗MAC抗生素至关重要。虽然双β-内酰胺类药物对脓肿分枝杆菌的疗效一直受到关注,但双β-内酰胺类药物对MAC的疗效尚不清楚。本研究采用6种口服抗生素和22种静脉注射抗生素,采用肉汤微量稀释棋盘法测定双β-内酰胺类抗生素是否对MAC有效,以及哪种组合能协同抑制细菌生长。鸟分枝杆菌与胞内分枝杆菌的联合作用及抑菌活性存在差异。5种口服β-内酰胺组合和78种静脉注射β-内酰胺组合对M. avium型菌株有协同作用。在禽分枝杆菌临床分离株中,法罗培南与头孢呋辛联用的协同效应最高,阿莫西林与特比培南联用的最低抑菌浓度最低。这两对clr易感和耐药禽分枝杆菌临床分离株的联合效应无显著差异。综上所述,无论CLR易感性如何,口服β-内酰胺联合用药对鸟分枝杆菌均有效。因此,在治疗MAC肺部疾病时,确定是鸟分枝杆菌还是细胞内分枝杆菌是病因至关重要。禽分枝杆菌复合体引起慢性呼吸道感染,但治疗往往受到耐药性、不耐受或相互作用的限制。由于迫切需要新的治疗策略,我们重点研究了应用广泛且耐受性良好的β-内酰胺类抗生素。虽然双β-内酰胺对脓肿分枝杆菌有效,但其对鸟分枝杆菌复合体的效用仍未得到充分研究。我们的体外研究显示,几种β-内酰胺组合对鸟分枝杆菌有效,无论耐药性如何,表明临床应用的潜力。相比之下,胞内分枝杆菌对β-内酰胺的敏感性较低。鉴于这种药物敏感性的差异,我们强调临床需要区分鸟分枝杆菌和细胞内分枝杆菌,以优化鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺部疾病的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信