Assessing patient satisfaction in a novel frontier: the model of ambulatory surgery center in rural eastern Uganda.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Brittany Sacks, Angellica Giibwa, Denis Hilary, Anna Kalumana, Michael L Marin, Linda P Zhang
{"title":"Assessing patient satisfaction in a novel frontier: the model of ambulatory surgery center in rural eastern Uganda.","authors":"Brittany Sacks, Angellica Giibwa, Denis Hilary, Anna Kalumana, Michael L Marin, Linda P Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12183-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standalone ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are still an innovative concept in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and patients' satisfaction with this model remains uninvestigated. In the US, patient satisfaction with ASCs is assessed by the validated Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS). This study leveraged the CAHPS to quantify patient satisfaction of ASCs in rural Uganda and assess key patient-related and institutional correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted at Kyabirwa Surgical Center (KSC), the first standalone ASC in rural Eastern Uganda, where patients were interviewed postoperatively regarding their perioperative experiences. A modified version of CAHPS with appropriate internal consistency was used to evaluate satisfaction, and SPSS 26 was used for binomial regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 124 patients, 120 (97%) reported satisfaction across all care stages, scoring ≥ 80% on the modified CAHPS instrument. This level of satisfaction aligns with top-performing U.S. hospitals and resource-limited settings, where satisfaction rates have been as low as 33% and 8%, respectively. The mean age of the sample was 46 (SD = 16.3) and 70% of patients were male. Satisfaction was more prevalent among patients who had visited another healthcare facility within 2 months (p = 0.046); dissatisfaction was more prevalent among patients who felt providers didn't proactively give diagnoses or advice (p = 0.028), suggest exams (p = 0.028), or prepare them for recovery (p = 0.004). Significant barriers to care included 38.7% expressing insufficient income to address basic needs, 69.3% experiencing severe or very severe symptoms before presenting to KSC, and 33.1% having difficulty accessing the facility. Patients suggested improvements in staffing, wait times, a canteen, and beds in waiting areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ASC model can result in high patient satisfaction in rural, resource-limited LMICs, confirming its capability to fulfill patient expectations despite diverse living conditions, travel constraints, and lifestyle circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12183-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Standalone ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are still an innovative concept in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and patients' satisfaction with this model remains uninvestigated. In the US, patient satisfaction with ASCs is assessed by the validated Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS). This study leveraged the CAHPS to quantify patient satisfaction of ASCs in rural Uganda and assess key patient-related and institutional correlates.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at Kyabirwa Surgical Center (KSC), the first standalone ASC in rural Eastern Uganda, where patients were interviewed postoperatively regarding their perioperative experiences. A modified version of CAHPS with appropriate internal consistency was used to evaluate satisfaction, and SPSS 26 was used for binomial regression analyses.

Results: Among 124 patients, 120 (97%) reported satisfaction across all care stages, scoring ≥ 80% on the modified CAHPS instrument. This level of satisfaction aligns with top-performing U.S. hospitals and resource-limited settings, where satisfaction rates have been as low as 33% and 8%, respectively. The mean age of the sample was 46 (SD = 16.3) and 70% of patients were male. Satisfaction was more prevalent among patients who had visited another healthcare facility within 2 months (p = 0.046); dissatisfaction was more prevalent among patients who felt providers didn't proactively give diagnoses or advice (p = 0.028), suggest exams (p = 0.028), or prepare them for recovery (p = 0.004). Significant barriers to care included 38.7% expressing insufficient income to address basic needs, 69.3% experiencing severe or very severe symptoms before presenting to KSC, and 33.1% having difficulty accessing the facility. Patients suggested improvements in staffing, wait times, a canteen, and beds in waiting areas.

Conclusion: The ASC model can result in high patient satisfaction in rural, resource-limited LMICs, confirming its capability to fulfill patient expectations despite diverse living conditions, travel constraints, and lifestyle circumstances.

评估病人满意度在一个新的前沿:门诊手术中心在乌干达东部农村的模式。
背景:在大多数低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),独立门诊手术中心(ASCs)仍然是一个创新概念,患者对这种模式的满意度仍未得到调查。在美国,患者对ASCs的满意度是通过经过验证的医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)来评估的。本研究利用CAHPS来量化乌干达农村ASCs的患者满意度,并评估关键的患者相关和机构相关因素。方法:这项前瞻性研究是在Kyabirwa手术中心(KSC)进行的,这是乌干达东部农村地区第一家独立的ASC,患者在术后接受了关于围手术期经历的访谈。采用内部一致性适当的CAHPS改进版本进行满意度评价,采用SPSS 26进行二项回归分析。结果:124例患者中,120例(97%)在所有护理阶段均表示满意,改良CAHPS评分≥80%。这一满意度水平与美国表现最好的医院和资源有限的环境一致,其中满意度分别低至33%和8%。样本的平均年龄为46岁(SD = 16.3), 70%的患者为男性。满意度在2个月内去过其他医疗机构的患者中更为普遍(p = 0.046);不满情绪在那些认为医生没有主动给出诊断或建议(p = 0.028)、建议检查(p = 0.028)或为康复做好准备(p = 0.004)的患者中更为普遍。获得护理的重大障碍包括:38.7%的人表示收入不足以满足基本需求,69.3%的人在到KSC就诊前出现严重或非常严重的症状,33.1%的人难以进入该设施。患者建议改善人员配备、等候时间、食堂和等候区床位。结论:在农村、资源有限的中低收入国家,ASC模式可以带来较高的患者满意度,证实了其在不同生活条件、旅行限制和生活方式环境下满足患者期望的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信