Trends in opioid prescribing by oncologists for Medicare beneficiaries from 2014 to 2022.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shaimaa Elshafie, Lorenzo Villa Zapata
{"title":"Trends in opioid prescribing by oncologists for Medicare beneficiaries from 2014 to 2022.","authors":"Shaimaa Elshafie, Lorenzo Villa Zapata","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overprescribing of opioids has led to hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths and substantial health care costs. In response, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented a revised Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for opioids in 2018.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate trends in opioid prescribing by oncologists for Medicare Part D beneficiaries from 2014 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from the 2014-2022 Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use Files. Opioid claims and prescribing trends were assessed by opioid types, oncologist subspecialty, geographic region, and rurality status. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to assess the changes in oncologists' prescribing patterns before and after the 2018 REMS modifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 25,371 unique oncologists, with the majority being male (66%) and specializing in hematology-oncology (47%). Over the study period, oncologists issued more than 9.4 million opioid prescriptions, with long-acting opioids accounting for 18% of these claims. Hematology-oncology specialists were responsible for the largest share of the prescriptions (67%). Oncologists practicing in the South and rural areas exhibited higher prescribing rates and longer average supply durations than those in other regions. A national sustainable decline in opioid prescribing was observed among oncologists between 2014 and 2022, with a significant immediate decline following 2018 in which the REMS changes were implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2018 FDA REMS update coincided with significant declines in opioid prescribing by oncologists treating Medicare beneficiaries. Although other factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may have also contributed to this decline, the sustained downward trend over time highlights the need for targeted policies and tailored provider education to ensure effective cancer pain management and to address persistent regional and rural-urban disparities in prescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"991-996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Overprescribing of opioids has led to hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths and substantial health care costs. In response, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented a revised Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for opioids in 2018.

Objective: To evaluate trends in opioid prescribing by oncologists for Medicare Part D beneficiaries from 2014 to 2022.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2014-2022 Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use Files. Opioid claims and prescribing trends were assessed by opioid types, oncologist subspecialty, geographic region, and rurality status. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to assess the changes in oncologists' prescribing patterns before and after the 2018 REMS modifications.

Results: The analysis included 25,371 unique oncologists, with the majority being male (66%) and specializing in hematology-oncology (47%). Over the study period, oncologists issued more than 9.4 million opioid prescriptions, with long-acting opioids accounting for 18% of these claims. Hematology-oncology specialists were responsible for the largest share of the prescriptions (67%). Oncologists practicing in the South and rural areas exhibited higher prescribing rates and longer average supply durations than those in other regions. A national sustainable decline in opioid prescribing was observed among oncologists between 2014 and 2022, with a significant immediate decline following 2018 in which the REMS changes were implemented.

Conclusions: The 2018 FDA REMS update coincided with significant declines in opioid prescribing by oncologists treating Medicare beneficiaries. Although other factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may have also contributed to this decline, the sustained downward trend over time highlights the need for targeted policies and tailored provider education to ensure effective cancer pain management and to address persistent regional and rural-urban disparities in prescribing practices.

2014年至2022年,肿瘤学家为医疗保险受益人开具阿片类药物处方的趋势。
背景:阿片类药物的过量处方已导致数十万人因过量使用而死亡,并造成巨额医疗费用。作为回应,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于2018年实施了修订后的阿片类药物风险评估和缓解战略(REMS)。目的:评估2014年至2022年医疗保险D部分受益人肿瘤学家开具阿片类药物处方的趋势。方法:本横断面研究使用2014-2022年医疗保险D部分处方者公共使用文件的数据。阿片类药物索赔和处方趋势由阿片类药物类型、肿瘤学家亚专科、地理区域和农村状况进行评估。进行了中断时间序列分析,以评估肿瘤学家在2018年REMS修改前后处方模式的变化。结果:该分析包括25,371名独特的肿瘤学家,其中大多数是男性(66%),专门从事血液肿瘤学(47%)。在研究期间,肿瘤学家开出了940多万张阿片类药物处方,长效阿片类药物占这些处方的18%。血液肿瘤学专家占处方的最大份额(67%)。在南方和农村地区执业的肿瘤学家比其他地区表现出更高的处方率和更长的平均供应持续时间。2014年至2022年期间,肿瘤学家的阿片类药物处方在全国范围内持续下降,在实施REMS改革的2018年之后,阿片类药物处方立即显著下降。结论:2018年FDA REMS更新恰逢肿瘤学家治疗医疗保险受益人的阿片类药物处方显着下降。尽管COVID-19大流行等其他因素也可能导致这种下降,但随着时间的推移,这种持续下降趋势突出表明,需要制定有针对性的政策和有针对性的提供者教育,以确保有效的癌症疼痛管理,并解决处方做法中持续存在的区域和城乡差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信